METHODS:Thirty-five bitches undergoing elective CS were randomly assigned to propofol-isoflurane (PROP, n = 17) or alfaxalone-isoflurane (ALFA, n = 18) induction. Maternal vital signs and isoflurane requirements were monitored intraoperatively. Umbilical cord blood samples were analyzed for gases and electrolytes. Neonatal vitality was assessed using a modified Apgar score at 0, 5, and 20 min.
RESULTS:Both protocols provided generally stable anesthesia, but hypotension episodes were more frequent in ALFA dams after fetal removal (44.4% vs. 17.7%) and at the closure (66.7% vs. 17.7%). Isoflurane requirements were higher in the ALFA group. Neonates from ALFA dams showed higher umbilical cord pH (7.19 ± 0.09 vs. 7.16 ± 0.08) and lower pCO₂ (64.4 ± 16.0 vs. 72.3 ± 16.6 mmHg). At 20 min, Apgar scores were significantly higher in the ALFA group (8.22 ± 0.95 vs. 7.79 ± 0.59). All puppies survived the first week of life.
CONCLUSIONS:Alfaxalone induction was associated with reduced neonatal acidosis and improved vitality compared with propofol, though it increased maternal isoflurane requirements and hypotension risk later in surgery. Alfaxalone-isoflurane may offer neonatal advantages, but close monitoring of maternal blood pressure is essential.