Anti-CD30 antibody drug conjugate(NBE-Therapeutics)

A man in his 30s with a history of refractory classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma presented with subacute onset asymmetric sensory disturbance, and severe weakness affecting his right more than left hand. Symptom onset was 18 weeks after commencing brentuximab vedotin (BV) treatment, an anti-CD30 antibody drug-conjugate for relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Symptoms progressed to his lower limbs with distal sensory loss, gait imbalance, bilateral foot drop and mild proximal leg weakness. He was globally areflexic. Neurophysiology revealed a mildly asymmetric, non-length dependent, motor >sensory polyradiculoneuropathy, with mixed axonal and demyelinating features. Extensive laboratory work-up, lumbar puncture and MRI of the brachial plexus, brain, spine and chest were unremarkable. Treatment with plasma exchange, followed by intravenous immunoglobulin, resulted in objective clinical improvement 4 weeks after. BV is a potent antimicrotubule agent, thus well known to cause a length-dependent sensory axonal polyneuropathy. Demyelinating polyneuropathy, with more prominent motor involvement, in association with BV is much rarer.

Brentuximab vedotin (BV), a conjugate of anti‐CD30 antibody and monomethyl auristatin E, has emerged as a promising treatment option for refractory CD30+ mycosis fungoides (MF) and primary cutaneous anaplastic large‐cell lymphoma (pcALCL). BV has been shown to be safe and effective in treating Hodgkin's lymphoma and peripheral T‐cell lymphoma. This multicenter, prospective, single‐arm phase I/II study evaluated the efficacy of BV in Japanese patients with CD30+ cutaneous lymphomas, namely CD30+ cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma. Participants were divided into two groups: those with CD30+ MF or pcALCL (cohort 1, n = 13) and those with CD30+ lymphoproliferative disorders other than those in cohort 1 (cohort 2, n = 3). The studied population included the full analysis set (FAS), modified FAS (mFAS), and safety analysis set (SAF). These sets were identified in cohorts 1 and 1 + 2 and labeled FAS1 and FAS2, mFAS1 and mFAS2, and SAF1 and SAF2, respectively. Each treatment cycle lasted 3 weeks, and BV was continued for up to 16 cycles after the third cycle based on treatment response. The primary endpoint was the 4‐month objective response rate (ORR4) determined by the Independent Review Forum (IRF). ORR4 was 69.2% for FAS1 and 62.5% for FAS2 (P < 0.0001). Secondary endpoints of ORR, assessed using the global response score (53.8% in FAS1) and modified severity‐weighted assessment tool (62.5% in FAS1), using the IRF, provided results comparable to the primary findings. The incidence of ≥grade 3 adverse events (≥15%) in SAF1 was peripheral neuropathy in three patients (23%) and fever and eosinophilia in two patients (15%). In conclusion, BV showed favorable efficacy, tolerability, and safety profile in Japanese patients with relapsed or refractory CD30+ primary cutaneous T‐cell lymphoma. The trial was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, Japan (protocol ID: UMIN000034205).