Article
作者: MARANGI, Stefania ; BOSSA, Fabrizio ; PUZZONO, Marta ; REICHE, Pamela ; SPINA, Luisa ; Costamagna, Guido ; Manes, Gianpiero ; KUVAEV, Roman ; TESTONI, Pier Alberto ; OREKHOV, Aleksei ; RUDLER, Franz ; AMATO, Arnaldo ; DEVANI, Massimo ; MUTIGNANI, Massimiliano ; HERBERG, Philipp ; ARPURT, Jean Pierre ; NEUSTROEV, Vladimir Gennadievich ; SEGATO, Sergio ; BELLON, Serge ; RONDONOTTI, Emanuele ; CIPRANDI, Giorgio ; HARTMANN, Dirk ; SHAPINA, Marina ; Spada, Cristiano ; Prada, Alberto ; VETRONE, Lorenzo Maria ; OVECHKIN, Vyacheslav ; PISANI, Antonio ; Kashin, Sergey ; Jakobs, Ralf ; OCCHIPINTI, Pietro ; CODAZZI, Manuela ; ZIMMERMANN, Tim ; BALZARINI, Marco ; TUKTAGULOV, Nikita ; Ponchon, Thierry ; LOVERA, Mauro ; Valats, Jean Christophe ; Tontini, Gian Eugenio ; JANKE, Daniel ; VIALE, Edi ; ATTARDO, Simona ; BORDIN, Dmitry ; Sferrazza, Sandro ; Vecchi, Maurizio ; CADONI, Sergio ; CANNIZZARO, Renato ; LOMBARDO, Vincenza ; CAVALLARO, Flaminia ; KHITARYAN, Alexandr ; Fedorishina, Olga ; PENAGINI, Roberto ; Elli, Luca ; Orsatti, Anna ; Hinkel, Carsten ; SCHETTINO, Mario ; Uebel, Peter ; VLADIMIROVA, Alexandra Alekseevna ; DICEMBRE, Luca Pio ; NIKOLSKAYA, Karine ; PRETTI, Cinzia ; PIOCHE, Mathieu ; Paolo, Dhanai Di ; Veselov, Victor ; GARANINA, Elena ; VOLLMAR, Johanna ; MAIERO, Stefania ; BUNKOVA, Elena ; MASSELLA, Arianna ; Bocus, Paolo ; TROVATO, Cristina ; GUERRA, Maria ; BONATO, Giulia ; BRAVI, Ivana ; Fiori, Giancarla ; Radaelli, Franco ; ZARA, Federica ; Soru, Pietro ; Carnovali, Marino ; Magnoli, Michela ; BLANC, Pierre ; Melnikova, Ekaterina ; REALDON, Stefano ; BENINI, Marco ; BULANOVA, Natalia ; PAPPARELLA, Luigi Giovanni ; Cesaro, Paola ; GUSEYNOVA, Sabina
BACKGROUNDBowel preparation represents a significant issue to high-quality colonoscopy. Oral mannitol requires a single dose, is of low volume, and has a pleasant taste and rapid action.AIMSThis SATISFACTION study compared single-dose (same day) oral mannitol 100 g/750 mL with standard split-dose PEG-ASC2 L (MoviPrep®).METHODSThe primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with adequate bowel cleansing. Secondary endpoints included efficacy (adenoma detection rate, caecal intubation rate, time of evacuation), safety (intestinal gases concentration, haemato-chemical parameters, adverse events), and patient satisfaction.RESULTSThe study included 703 patients (352 treated with mannitol and 351 with PEG-ASC). Mannitol was not inferior to PEG-ASC for the primary endpoint (91.1 % and 95.5 %, respectively; p-value for the non-inferiority =0.0131). There was no significant difference for secondary efficacy endpoints. The acceptability profile was significantly better in the mannitol group for ease of use, taste, and willingness to reuse (p < 0.0001 for all). The concentration of intestinal gases (H2, CH4) was similar between groups and well below those potentially critical.CONCLUSIONSThe SATISFACTION study indicated that low-volume, single-dose mannitol may satisfy an unmet clinical need since it was more acceptable to the patient and not inferior to the split-dose PEG-ASC for bowel cleansing efficacy.