作者: Marwah, Vikas ; Kumar, Tentu Ajai ; Vasudevan, Shrinath ; Pandey, Indermani ; Adhikari, Sudipt ; Kapoor, Suraj ; Malik, Virender ; Choudhary, Robin ; Pemmaraju, Arpita

Background: Intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) has been used as an effective agent since 1949 for managing complicated pleural effusion and empyema. Several agents, such as streptokinase, urokinase (UK), and recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA), have been found to be effective with variable effectiveness. However, a head-tohead controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the most frequently used agents, i.e., UK and rt-PA (alteplase) for managing complicated pleural effusion has rarely been reported.Methods: A total of 50 patients were randomized in two intervention groups, i.e., UK and rt-PA. The dose of rt-PA was 10 mg, and that of UK was 1.0 lac units. UK was given thrice daily for 2 days, followed by clamping to allow the retainment of drugs in the pleural space for 2 hours. rt-PA was instilled into the pleural space twice daily for 2 days, and intercostal drainage was clamped for 1 hour.Results: A total of 50 patients were enrolled into the study, of which 84% (n=42) were males and 16% (n=8) were females. Among them, 30 (60%) patients received UK, and 20 (40%) patients received alteplase as IPFT agents. The percentage of mean± standard deviation changes in pleural opacity was –33.0%±9.9% in the UK group and –41.0%±14.9% in the alteplase group, respectively (p=0.014). Pain was the most common adverse side effect, occurring in 60% (n=18) of the patients in the UK group and in 40% (n=8) of the patients in the alteplase group (p=0.24), while fever was the second most common side effect. Patients who reported early (within 6 weeks of onset of symptoms) showed a greater response than those who reported late for the intervention.Conclusion: IPFT is a safe and effective option for managing complicated pleural effusion or empyema, and newer agents, such as alteplase, have greater efficacy and a similar adverse effect profile when compared with conventional agents, such as UK.

2024-07-01·Annals of vascular surgery

A Retrospective Study Comparing Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy with Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

Article

作者: Zeng, Xiande ; Ju, ZhiNan ; Chen, Wei ; Zhu, Xianhua ; Zeng, Xiong ; Dai, KangHui ; Min, XiXi ; Zhou, WeiMin ; Qiu, Jiehua

BACKGROUND:

This study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety between pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in the context of acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT).

METHODS:

A retrospective review of our institution's patient database spanning from February 2011 to December 2019 was performed to identify cases of acute LEDVT. The patients were categorized into 2 distinct groups based on the thrombolytic interventions administered: the PMT group, specifically denoting PMT with AngioJet in our investigation, and the CDT group. Comprehensive data sets encompassing patient demographics, risk factors, procedural specifics, thrombolysis grading, and complications were collected. Subsequent follow-up evaluations at the 2-year mark posttreatment included assessments of postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) and the quality of life.

RESULTS:

Among the 348 patients identified (mean age: 50.12 ± 15.87 years; 194 females), 200 underwent CDT during the early stage (2011 to 2017), while 148 received PMT between 2017 and 2019. Baseline data between the 2 groups exhibited no statistically significant differences. Thrombus scores significantly decreased in both cohorts posttherapy (each P < 0.001).Patients subjected to PMT demonstrated higher thrombolysis rates (77.35 ± 9.44% vs. 50.85 ± 6.72%), reduced administration of the thrombolytic agent urokinase [20 (20€20) vs. 350 (263€416), P < 0.001], larger limb circumference differences (above the knee: 6.03 ± 1.76 cm vs. 4.51 ± 1.82 cm, P < 0.001; below the knee: 2.90 ± 1.16 cm vs. 2.51 ± 0.90 cm, P < 0.001), and shorter lengths of stay (7.19 ± 3.11 days vs. 12.33 ± 4.77 days, P < 0.001). However, the PMT group exhibited a higher decline in hemoglobin levels (13.41 ± 10.59 g/L vs. 10.88 ± 11.41 g/L, P = 0.038) and an increase in creatinine levels [9.58 (2.32€15.82) umol/L vs. 4.53 (2.87€6.08) umol/L, P < 0.001] compared to the CDT group. No statistically significant differences were observed in the numbers of balloon angioplasty, stent implantation (each P > 0.050), and minor and major complications between the 2 groups. At the 1-year follow-up, PTS occurred in 13.51% of the PMT group compared to 26% of the CDT group (P = 0.025), with a higher incidence of moderate-severe PTS in the CDT group (8% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.036). At the 2-year follow-up, PTS was observed in 16.2% of the PMT group and 31.5% in the CDT group, P = 0.004. Preoperative and postoperative D-values of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary and SF-36 Mental Component Summary showed no statistically significant between-group differences.

CONCLUSIONS:

In our institutional experience, both PMT and CDT have proven to be effective and safe therapeutic approaches for managing acute LEDVT. PMT, in particular, demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving thrombosis resolution and mitigating the risk of PTS, affirming its role as a favorable intervention in this clinical context.

2024-05-01·ACS applied materials & interfaces

Platelet Membrane-Coated r-SAK Improves Thrombolytic Efficacy by Targeting Thrombus

Article

作者: Wang, Qin ; Lin, Qingxia ; Wu, Tianyu ; Li, Mingxi ; Li, Chen ; Li, Yule ; Li, Chunjian ; Wu, Tian ; Dong, Mengying ; Lin, Zhenyu ; Gong, Xiaoxuan ; Yang, Fang ; Hua, Rui ; Zhang, Wenhao ; Zhou, Xiaoyu ; Tan, Chunyue

Thrombolytic therapy is one of the most effective treatments for thrombus dissolution and recanalization of blocked vessels in thrombotic diseases. However, the application of the thrombolytic strategy has been limited due to unsatisfactory thrombolytic efficacy, relatively higher bleeding complications, and consequently restricted indications. Recombinant staphylokinase (r-SAK) is a third-generation thrombolytic agent produced by genetic engineering technology, which exhibits a better thrombolytic efficacy than urokinase and recombinant streptokinase. Inspired by the natural affinity of platelets in hemostasis and pathological thrombosis, we developed a platelet membrane (PM)-coated r-SAK (PM-r-SAK). Results from animal experiments and human in vitro studies showed that the PM-r-SAK had a thrombolytic efficacy equal to or better than its 4-fold dose of r-SAK. In a totally occluded rabbit femoral artery thrombosis model, the PM-r-SAK significantly shortened the initial recanalization time compared to the same dose and 4-fold dose of r-SAK. Regarding the recanalized vessels, the PM-r-SAK prolonged the time of reperfusion compared to the same dose and 4-fold dose of r-SAK, though the differences were not significant. An in vitro thrombolytic experiment demonstrated that the thrombolytic efficacy of PM-r-SAK could be inhibited by platelet-poor plasma from patients taking aspirin and ticagrelor. PM coating significantly improves the thrombolytic efficacy of r-SAK, which is related to the thrombus-targeting activity of the PM-r-SAK and can be inhibited by aspirin- and ticagrelor-treated plasma.

100 项与尿激酶(Mochida Pharmaceutical) 相关的药物交易

登录后查看更多信息