BACKGROUNDEvidence on the efficacy of mamushi antivenom serum is limited.OBJECTIVETo investigate the effectiveness of mamushi (Gloydius blomhoffii) antivenom serum.METHODSThe Observational Research Of the Clinical course after mamusHI bite (OROCHI) study was a prospective multicenter study conducted at 24 hospitals in Japan. Patients hospitalized due to mamushi bite were registered. The primary endpoint was the length of hospital stay. Secondary endpoints were adverse effects, pain (numerical rating scale), and grade of swelling. We performed a cohort analysis to compare outcomes between patients treated with mamushi antivenom serum (antivenom group) and those who were not treated with the serum (no-antivenom group).RESULTSOverall, 106 patients were registered across 18 hospitals between April 22, 2020, and October 31, 2022. Of these, 92 were eligible for the analyses, with 53 and 39 in the antivenom and no-antivenom groups. The median (interquartile) length of hospital stay was not significantly different between the antivenom and no-antivenom groups (5 (3-6) days vs. 3 (1-8) days, P = 0.369). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds ratio for a hospital stay of >4 days was 1.331 in patients treated with mamushi antivenom serum (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.744‒2.015, P = 0.574) and 6.154 in patients treated with cepharanthine (95% CI = 1.442-26.258, P = 0.014). Pain and the grade of swelling were worse in the antivenom group than in the no-antivenom group up to 24 h after arrival, but there were no differences in these outcomes after 48 h.CONCLUSIONAlthough the effectiveness of mamushi antivenom serum in reducing the length of hospitalization was not demonstrated, beneficial effects on pain and swelling were observed.