Sobuzoxane

Introduction: In Japan, etoposide or sobuzoxane, a type of topoisomerase II inhibitor, is orally administered in patients with lymphoma who cannot tolerate conventional combination chemotherapy. However, the related clinical data remain to be fully summarized.Areas covered: We evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of etoposide and sobuzoxane.Expert opinion: Previous studies on etoposide or sobuzoxane monotherapy, including those among patients who could not tolerate conventional chemotherapy, suggested a favorable overall response rate (ORR) with moderate gastrointestinal or liver/renal toxicity. As for adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma, a clinical trial with a limited sample size exhibited an ORR of >70%. Remarkably, the percentage of patients with a poor performance status was high among those receiving etoposide/sobuzoxane. Given a lack of randomized studies, etoposide/sobuzoxane might be a therapeutic option for lymphoma in a palliative setting. In the future, prospective trials with a homologous treatment schedule are warranted, in which the association between clinical efficacy and characteristics of lymphomas, such as specific gene alterations, should be elucidated.

As the aging society advances, the number of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients is increasing. Aged relapsed or refractory (r/r) NHL patients have limited treatment options. Therefore, a safe and effective regimen is urgently needed for these patients. Thus, we originally developed the MTX-HOPE (methotrexate, hydrocortisone, vincristine, sobuzoxane, and etoposide) regimen for r/r NHL and validated the safety and efficacy of this regimen in a clinical setting. We analyzed the data of 42 r/r NHL patients who received MTX-HOPE in this single-center retrospective cohort study. The median age of the patients was 81 years. The overall response rate was 45.3%. The median overall survival (OS) was 7 months, the one-year OS was 43.7%, and the two-year OS was 40.8%. Grade ≥3 neutropenia and renal dysfunction were observed in 47.6% and 11.9% of patients, respectively, and treatment-related death were not observed. Appropriate supportive care enabled these patients to continue the MTX-HOPE regimen. The proportion of patients who needed hospitalization during MTX-HOPE therapy was only 21.4%. Multivariable analyses with the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that both OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were significantly influenced by high Ki-67 expression in pathology, with response to the MTX-HOPE regimen after three to five cycles as a time-dependent covariate. Our results suggest that MTX-HOPE therapy can be an option for non-aggressive r/r NHL patients. To validate MTX-HOPE therapy, further prospective investigation is needed.