Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health concern and shares a high comorbidity with asthma. Recent research suggests that different allergic diseases, such as AR, asthma, allergic conjunctivitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU), are evoked by common pathological mechanisms characterised by the release of histamine and other inflammatory mediators. Although H(1) receptor antagonists are the mainstay of therapy for allergic disease, the unacceptably high incidence of anticholinergic and CNS-related side effects of first-generation H(1) antagonists led to the search for improved second-generation H(1) antagonists. While many of these agents were largely devoid of CNS side effects, their tendency for drug-drug interactions (e.g., terfenadine and astemizole) resulted in an increased incidence of cardiotoxicity. Furthermore, second-generation H(1) antagonists exhibited weak anti-inflammatory properties and had no effect on nasal congestion. These observations emphasised the need for newer anti-allergic agents with a broader spectrum of activity and an improved safety profile. Among the newer H(1) antagonists currently in clinical development, desloratadine and mizolastine are the most widely studied. Both have a rapid onset of action, and desloratadine has demonstrated clinical efficacy in AR, CIU and seasonal asthma. Desloratadine has several advantages over other H(1) antagonists in that it has proven decongestant activity, a sparing effect on the use of bronchodilators (beta(2)-agonists) and a low potential for drug interactions. The broad anti-inflammatory properties of desloratadine and mizolastine, which distinguish these agents from other H(1) antagonists in clinical development (e.g., norastemizole and levocetirizine), suggest they may have a more profound impact on the underlying disease in patients suffering from different forms of allergy. The lack of clinical efficacy and safety data on rupatadine and HSR-609, both novel H(1) antagonists, precludes an accurate assessment of their potential for treating allergic disease. Epinastine and efletirizine are being developed exclusively for topical application and are unlikely to play a significant role in the management of allergic diseases as a whole.

2000-01-01·Pharmacology4区 · 医学

Effect of a Novel Anti-Allergic Agent, HSR-609, on Antigen-Induced Airway Hyperresponsiveness in Mice

4区 · 医学

Article

作者: Inagaki, Naoki ; Musoh, Keiichi ; Nagai, Hiroichi ; Tanaka, Hiroyuki ; Maeda, Yoshizou

The effects of a newly synthesized anti-allergic agent, HSR-609, on allergic airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation have been studied in sensitized mice. The effects were compared with those of two histamine H₁ receptor antagonists, cetirizine and terfenadine, and prednisolone. Three inhalations of antigen caused an increase in leukocytes (including eosinophils) with increases in IL-5 in BALF and airway hyperresponsiveness to acetylcholine in BALB/c mice. All drugs were orally administered once a day for 10 days from the day before the first inhalation of antigen. HSR-609 (10 mg/kg) and prednisolone (5 mg/kg) significantly inhibited the antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness, whereas cetirizine (10 mg/kg) or terfenadine (100 mg/kg) did not affect this airway response. At the same time HSR-609 inhibited the antigen-induced eosinophilia and IL-5 production in BALF. Prednisolone also showed an inhibitory effect on the airway eosinophilia and IL-5 production but not cetirizine and terfenadine in the same experiments. In addition, HSR-609 (p.o.) dose-dependently suppressed the accumulation of eosinophils elicited by antigen-stimulated D10G4.1 cells, a murine Th2 clone, in peritoneal cavity lavage fluid in AKR/J mice. These results suggest that HSR-609 inhibits allergic airway hyperresponsiveness to acetylcholine probably because of the inhibition of Th2-dependent eosinophilia caused by IL-5. In addition, effects of HSR-609 were different from those of cetirizine and terfenadine concerning the inhibition of antigen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness in mice.

2000-01-01·Pharmacology4区 · 医学

Effects of an Amphoteric Antiallergic Agent, HSR-609, on Antigen-Induced Late Phase Nasal Eosinophilia in Brown Norway Rats

4区 · 医学

Article

作者: Musoh, Keiichi ; Nagai, Hiroichi ; Nakamura, Nobuaki

The effect of a newly synthesized compound, HSR-609, on rat experimental rhinitis was investigated. In the first part of the study, a new experimental nasal allergic late phase eosinophilia model in Brown Norway (BN) rats was investigated. The increase in the number of antigen inhalations resulted in the proportional increase in the number of inflammatory cells such as macrophages, eosinophils and neutrophils in the nasal cavity lavage fluid (NCLF) at 5 h after each inhalation. The number of inflammatory cells reached a maximum 8 h after the antigen perfusion. Submaximum response was observed at 5 h after the antigen provocation. In this system, the serum IgG and IgE antibody titers measured by homologous passive cutaneous anaphylaxis were 160 and 640, respectively. In the second part of the study, the effects of prednisolone, cetirizine and a newly synthesized amphoteric antiallergic agent, HSR-609, on this allergic late nasal eosinophilia and neutrophilia in BN rats were investigated. Prednisolone and HSR-609 significantly inhibited the increase in the number of eosinophils in the NCLF but not cetirizine. Furthermore, prednisolone showed the inhibition of the increase in the number of macrophages and neutrophils in NCLF. These results suggest that this late phase eosinophilia model in the nose of BN rats may be useful for investigating the therapeutic drugs for nasal allergy and a newly synthesized amphoteric antiallergic agent, HSR-609, may be useful for the treatment of allergic rhinitis with eosinophilia.

100 项与 FY-609 相关的药物交易

登录后查看更多信息