ObjectiveThis study aimed to compare efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the biosimilar ranibizumab in comparison with the Innovator Ranibizumab in treatment-naive patients with neovascular (wet) age-related macular degeneration (nAMD or wAMD).Materials and MethodsThis comparative, double blind, multicentre, Phase III clinical study randomized eligible patients in a 3:1 ratio to receive either OPTIMAB® (Alkem Laboratories Ltd./ Enzene Biosciences Ltd.) or Innovator Ranibizumab. Intravitreal injections of Innovator Ranibizumab (0.5 mg in 0.05 mL) and OPTIMAB® (0.5 mg in 0.05 mL) were administered every four weeks for 12 weeks (three doses). Primary efficacy endpoints included loss of <15 letters from baseline, gain of ≥15 letters from baseline in visual acuity, mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline, and change in central subfoveal thickness (CSFT) from baseline at week 12. Safety was assessed through monitoring of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) throughout the study.ResultsOverall, of the 152 patients randomized, 141 (92.8%) patients (mean age, 66.6 ± 9.37 years) completed the study. Percentage of patients who lost < 15 letters in BCVA at week 12 from baseline was comparable in both the groups (100.0%, each). On secondary end point analysis, the two groups had comparable mean changes in BCVA (OPTIMAB®, 11.8 ± 9.18; innovator ranibizumab, 12.9 ± 10.29; P = 0.5509); proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters in visual acuity (OPTIMAB®, 32.18%; innovator ranibizumab, 25.74%; P = 0.4785) and mean change in CSFT (OPTIMAB®, -76.6 ± 89.03; Innovator ranibizumab, -73.1 ± 92.23 μm; P = 0.8422) at week 12 as compared to baseline. OPTIMAB® and innovator ranibizumab demonstrated comparable safety over the 12-week treatment period and no patient expressed anti-ranibizumab antibody in either group patient.ConclusionBiosimilar ranibizumab (OPTIMAB®) was non-inferior to innovator ranibizumab in terms of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity in the patients of nAMD.
