作者: Mudge, Elizabeth M. ; Krock, Bernd ; Tillmann, Urban ; Meyer, Stefanie ; Müller, Annegret ; Mudge, Elizabeth M ; Abele, Doris ; Tebben, Jan ; McCarron, Pearse

Azaspiracid-59 (AZA-59) was detected in plankton in coastal waters of the Pacific Northwest USA. Given that bivalves metabolize and transform accumulated phycotoxins, a strain of Azadinium poporum isolated from the coast of Washington State that is a known producer of AZA-59 was used in a controlled feeding experiment with mussels (Mytilus edulis) to assess AZA-59 accumulation rates and transformation into shellfish metabolites. Mussels started feeding immediately after the addition of A. poporum. Mussels were generally healthy during the entire experimental exposure of 18 days with prevailingly high rates of clearance (ca 100 mL per mussel and hour) and ingestion. Mussel were extracted after different exposure times and were analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled with low- and high-resolution mass spectrometry. In the course of the experiment a number of putative AZA-59 metabolites were detected including hydroxyl and carboxy analogs that corresponded with previously reported mussel metabolites of AZA-1. A significant formation of 3-OH fatty acid acyl esters relative to free AZAs was observed through the time course of the study, with numerous fatty acid ester variants of AZA-59 confirmed. These results illustrate the potential for metabolism of AZA59 in shellfish and provide important information for local AZA monitoring and toxicity testing along the Northern Pacific US coast.

2024-09-01·Journal of Hazardous Materials

Coordination regulation of enhanced performance reveals the tolerance mechanism of Chlamys farreri to azaspiracid toxicity

Article

作者: Tan, Zhijun ; Dong, Chenfan ; Zhang, Qianru ; Wu, Haiyan ; Zheng, Guanchao ; Gu, Haifeng

Azaspiracids (AZAs) are lipid biotoxins produced by the marine dinoflagellates Azadinium and Amphidoma spp. that can accumulate in shellfish and cause food poisoning in humans. However, the mechanisms underlying the tolerance of shellfish to high levels of such toxins remain poorly understood. This study investigated the combined effects of detoxification metabolism and stress-related responses in scallops Chlamys farreri exposed to AZA. Scallops accumulated a maximum of 361.81 μg AZA1 eq/kg and 41.6 % AZA residue remained after 21 days of exposure. A range of AZA2 metabolites, including AZA19, AZA11, and AZA23, and trace levels of AZA2-GST, were detected. Total hemocyte counts significantly increased and ROS levels remained consistently high until gradually decreasing. Immune system activation mediated mitochondrial dysfunction and severe energy deficiency. DEGs increased over time, with key genes CYP2J6 and GPX6 contributing to AZA metabolism. These transcriptome and metabolic results identify the regulation of energy metabolism pathways, including inhibition of the TCA cycle and activation of carbohydrates, amino acids, and lipids. AZA also induced autophagy through the MAPK-AMPK signaling pathways, and primary inhibited PI3K/AKT to decrease mTOR pathway expression. Our results provide additional insights into the resistance of C. farreri to AZA, characterized by re-establishing redox homeostasis toward a more oxidative state.

2024-04-02·Rheumatology

Azathioprine vs methotrexate in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: a monocentric retrospective study

Article

作者: Milanesi, Alessandra ; Monti, Sara ; Delvino, Paolo ; Quaglini, Silvana ; Montecucco, Carlomaurizio

AbstractObjectivesTo analyse the effectiveness, safety and steroid-sparing effect of AZA and MTX as induction of remission and maintenance treatment in eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis.MethodsWe retrospectively collected data from 57 patients divided into four groups according to treatment: MTX/AZA as first-line agents (MTX1/AZA1) in non-severe disease or as second-line maintenance therapy (MTX2/AZA2) in severe disease previously treated with CYC/rituximab. During the first 5 years of treatment with AZA/MTX we compared the groups according to: remission rate [defined as R1: BVAS = 0; R2: BVAS = 0 with prednisone ≤5 mg/day; R3 (MIRRA definition): BVAS = 0 with prednisone ≤3.75 mg/day], persistence on therapy, cumulative glucocorticoid (GC) dose, relapse and adverse events (AEs).ResultsThere were no significant differences in remission rates (R1) in each group (63% in MTX1 vs 75% in AZA1, P = 0.53; 91% in MTX2 vs 71% in AZA2, P = 0.23). MTX1 allowed R2 more frequently in the first 6 months compared with AZA1 (54% vs 12%, P = 0.04); no patients receiving AZA1 achieved R3 up to the first 18 months (vs 35% in MTX1, P = 0.07). The cumulative GC dose was lower for MTX2 vs AZA2 (6 g vs 10.7 g at 5 years, P = 0.03). MTX caused more AEs compared with AZA (66% vs 30%, P = 0.004), without affecting the suspension rate. No differences emerged in time-to-first relapse, although fewer patients treated with AZA2 had asthma/ENT relapses (23% vs 64%, P = 0.04).ConclusionA significant proportion of patients achieved remission with both MTX and AZA. MTX1 had an earlier remission on a lower GC dose but MTX2 had a better steroid-sparing effect.

100 项与 AZA-1 相关的药物交易

登录后查看更多信息