Pilsicainide Hydrochloride Hydrate

To characterize utility of atrioventricular block (AVB) dogs as atrial fibrillation (AF) model, we studied remodeling processes occurring in their atria in acute (<2 weeks) and chronic (>4 weeks) phases. Fifty beagle dogs were used. Holter electrocardiogram demonstrated that paroxysmal AF occurred immediately after the production of AVB, of which duration tended to be prolonged in chronic phase. Electrophysiological analysis showed that inter-atrial conduction time and duration of burst pacing-induced AF increased in the chronic phase compared with those in the acute phase, but that atrial effective refractory period was hardly altered. Echocardiographic study revealed that diameters of left atrium, right pulmonary vein and inferior vena cava increased similarly in the acute and chronic phases. Histological evaluation indicated that hypertrophy and fibrosis in atrial tissue increased in the chronic phase. Electropharmacological characterization showed that i.v. pilsicainide effectively suppressed burst pacing-induced AF with increasing atrial conduction time and refractoriness of AVB dogs in chronic phase, but that i.v. amiodarone did not exert such electrophysiological effects. Taken together, AVB dogs in chronic phase appear to possess such pathophysiology as developed in the atria of early-stage AF patients, and therefore they can be used to evaluate drug candidates against early-stage AF.

Intravenous infusion of sodium-channel blockers (SCB) with either ajmaline, flecainide, procainamide, or pilsicainide to unmask the ECG of Brugada syndrome is the drug challenge most commonly used for diagnostic purposes when investigating cases possibly related to inherited arrhythmia syndromes. For a patient undergoing an SCB challenge, the impact of a positive result goes well beyond its diagnostic implications. It is, therefore, appropriate to question who should undergo a SCB test to diagnose or exclude Brugada syndrome and, perhaps more importantly, who should not. We present a critical review of the benefits and drawbacks of the SCB challenge when performed in cardiac arrest survivors, patients presenting with syncope, family members of probands with confirmed Brugada syndrome, and asymptomatic patients with suspicious ECG.