We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 124I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) dosimetry-guided high-activity 131I-MIBG therapy of advanced pheochromocytoma or neuroblastoma. Methods: Fourteen patients with advanced pheochromocytoma or neuroblastoma, age 9-69 y, underwent 124I-MIBG PET scans and whole-body retention measurements to assess the whole-body dose as a surrogate of bone marrow toxicity and tumor (absorbed) dose per unit of administered activity. Dosimetry results together with individual patient characteristics were combined to guide a single therapeutic activity to achieve a high tumor dose without exceeding toxicity threshold. Toxicity was assessed for hematologic, hepatic, and renal function. Response was evaluated by RECIST, International Society of Pediatric Oncology Europe Neuroblastoma-like score, change in PET uptake, and quantitative PET parameters (SUVmax, SUVpeak, metabolic tumor volume, total lesion glycolysis), as well as visual decrease in number or in visual intensity of lesions on baseline to follow-up 124I-MIBG PET/CT. Results: The average therapeutic activity was 14 GBq. Eleven of 14 patients (79%) received each more than 10 GBq. One male patient was treated with a single activity of 50 GBq. Three patients were treated with lower activities between 3.5 and 7.0 GBq. Median overall survival was 85 mo (95% CI), and median progression-free survival was 25 mo (95% CI). Four (29%) and 5 (36%) patients demonstrated response (complete response or partial response) by RECIST and functional imaging, respectively. One patient exceeded whole-body dose of 2 Gy and demonstrated grade 3 hematologic toxicity, which resolved spontaneously within 12 mo after the therapy without the need for further treatment. Three patients (21%) demonstrated transient grade 1 renal toxicity. Conclusion: 124I-MIBG dosimetry-guided high-activity 131I-MIBG therapy in patients with advanced pheochromocytoma or neuroblastoma resulted in durable responses with a low rate of manageable adverse events. Efficacy of 124I-MIBG-guided activity escalation should further be assessed in a prospective setting.
