Sabcomeline Hydrochloride

In functional assay assessments using the five muscarinic receptor subtypes, a second generation of muscarinic M(1)-preferring receptor agonists [AC-42 (1), AC-260584 (2), 77-LH-28-1 (3) and LY-593039 (4)] was shown to have higher selectivity for muscarinic M(1) over M(3) receptor as compared to historical agonists [talsaclidine (8), sabcomeline (10), xanomeline (11), WAY-132983 (12), cevimeline (9) and NGX-267 (6)]. Another striking difference of these more recent compounds is their affinities for the dopamine D(2) and 5-HT(2B) receptors. Taken together, these results suggest that the newer compounds may have a greater clinical safety profile, especially with regard to muscarinic M(3) receptor-mediated events, than the historical agonists, but their affinities for other receptors may still compromise their use to validate the therapeutic potential of muscarinic M(1) receptor agonists.

We have demonstrated that the main metabolite of clozapine, N-desmethylclozapine, has a significant role in the ability of clozapine to improve some aspects of cognition in schizophrenia. Furthermore, there is also evidence to suggest that it is the muscarinic M(1) receptor agonist effect of N-desmethylclozapine that underlies its cognitive effects. In the present study we examined the efficacy of two muscarinic receptor agonists xanomeline and sabcomeline to increase the efflux of acetylcholine and dopamine in rat medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens. Microdialysis in awake, freely moving rats was used to demonstrate that xanomeline at 10, but not 1 or 3 mg/kg (s.c.), significantly increased acetylcholine efflux in both the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens. Sabcomeline, at 1 but not 0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg (s.c.), significantly increased acetylcholine efflux in the medial prefrontal cortex but not the nucleus accumbens. Both xanomeline and sabcomeline dose-dependently increased dopamine efflux in the medial prefrontal cortex but only high dose of xanomeline (10 mg/kg, s.c.) and sabcomeline (1 mg/kg, s.c.) increased that in the nucleus accumbens. The acetylcholine and dopamine efflux induced by xamomeline (10 mg/kg, s.c.) and sabcomeline (1 mg/kg, s.c.) were significantly blocked by the preferential muscarinic M(1) receptor antagonist telenzepine (3 mg/kg, s.c.), but significantly potentiated by the atypical antipsychotic drug risperidone (0.1 mg/kg, s.c.), which does not have much affinity for muscarinic receptor(s). According to the analysis of net-AUC (area under the curve) values of acetylcholine and dopamine levels, the rank order of ability of these drugs to increase acetylcholine or dopamine levels is sabcomeline>xanomeline approximately AC260584>N-desmethylclozapine. The present study suggests that the binding potency of muscarinic M(1) receptors is greatly related to their ability to increase cortical acetylcholine and dopamine efflux, and that this may have some relevance for treatment of the cognitive deficit of schizophrenia.