TOP1 targeted siRNA(Beijing Jenkem)

Inhibitors of a DNA repair enzyme known as polynucleotide kinase 3'-phosphatase (PNKP) are expected to show synergistic cytotoxicity in combination with topoisomerase I (TOP1) inhibitors in cancer. In this study, the synergistic cytotoxicity of a novel inhibitor of PNKP, i.e., A83B4C63, with a potent TOP1 inhibitor, i.e., SN-38, against colorectal cancer cells was investigated. Polymeric micelles (PMs) for preferred tumor delivery of A83B4C63, developed through physical encapsulation of this compound in methoxy poly(ethylene oxide)-poly(α-benzyl carboxylate-ε-caprolactone) (mPEO-b-PBCL) micelles, were combined with SN-38 in free or PM form. The PM form of SN-38 was prepared through chemical conjugation of SN-38 to the functional end group of mPEO-b-PBCL and further assembly of mPEO-b-PBCL-SN-38 in water. Moreover, mixed micelles composed of mPEO-b-PBCL and mPEO-b-PBCL-SN-38 were used to co-load A83B4C63 and SN-38 in the same nanoformulation. The loading content (% w/w) of the SN-38 and A83B4C63 to mPEO-b-PBCL in the co-loaded formulation was 7.91 ± 0.66 and 16.13 ± 0.11% (w/w), respectively, compared to 15.67 ± 0.34 (% w/w) and 23.06 ± 0.63 (% w/w) for mPEO-b-PBCL micelles loading individual drugs. Notably, the average diameter of PMs co-encapsulating both SN-38 and A83B4C63 was larger than that of PMs encapsulating either of these compounds alone but still lower than 60 nm. The release of A83B4C63 from PMs co-encapsulating both drugs was 76.36 ± 1.41% within 24 h, which was significantly higher than that of A83B4C63-encapsulated micelles (42.70 ± 0.72%). In contrast, the release of SN-38 from PMs co-encapsulating both drugs was 44.15 ± 2.61% at 24 h, which was significantly lower than that of SN-38-conjugated PMs (74.16 ± 3.65%). Cytotoxicity evaluations by the MTS assay as analyzed by the Combenefit software suggested a clear synergy between PM/A83B4C63 (at a concentration range of 10-40 μM) and free SN-38 (at a concentration range of 0.001-1 μM). The synergistic cytotoxic concentration range for SN-38 was narrowed down to 0.1-1 or 0.01-1 μM when combined with PM/A83B4C63 at 10 or 20-40 μM, respectively. In general, PMs co-encapsulating A83B4C63 and SN-38 at drug concentrations within the synergistic range (10 μM for A83B4C63 and 0.05-1 μM for SN-38) showed slightly less enhancement of SN-38 anticancer activity than a combination of individual micelles, i.e., A83B4C63 PMs + SN-38 PMs at the same molar concentrations. This was attributed to the slower release of SN-38 from the SN-38 and A83B4C63 co-encapsulated PMs compared to PMs only encapsulating SN-38. Cotreatment of cells with TOP1 inhibitors and A83B4C63 formulation enhanced the expression level of γ-HA2X, cleaved PARP, caspase-3, and caspase-7 in most cases. This trend was more consistent and notable for PMs co-encapsulating both A83B4C63 and SN-38. The overall result from the study shows a synergy between PMs of SN-38 and A83B4C63 as a mixture of two PMs for individual drugs or PMs co-encapsulating both drugs.

Rationale: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) does not respond to anti-estrogen and anti-HER2 therapies and is commonly treated by chemotherapy. TNBC has a high recurrence rate, particularly within the first 3 years. Thus, there is an urgent clinical need to develop more effective therapies for TNBC. Topoisomerase I (TOP1) inhibitors cause DNA damage, making these drugs desirable for TNBC treatment since DNA repair machinery is defective in this subtype of breast cancer. Among the main molecular subtypes of breast cancer, the TNBC cell lines exhibited the highest TOP1 inhibition sensitivity. However, clinically used TOP1 inhibitors, such as topotecan and irinotecan, have shown limited clinical applications and the reasons remain unclear. Understanding the mechanism of differential responses to TOP1 blockade and identifying the predictive markers for cancer cell sensitivity will help further TOP1-targeted therapy for TNBC treatment and improve the clinical use of TOP1 inhibitors. Methods: Viability assays were used to evaluate breast cancer cell sensitivity to topotecan and other TOP1 inhibitors as well as TOP2 inhibitors. An in vitro-derived topotecan-resistant TNBC cell model and TNBC xenograft models were employed to confirm cancer cell response to TOP1 blockade. RNA-seq was used to identify potential predictive markers for TNBC cell response to TOP1 blockade. Western blotting and qRT-PCR were performed to measure the protein levels and RNA expression. ATAC-seq and luciferase reporter assays were used to examine MYC transcriptional regulations. The effects of MYC and JNK in cancer cell response to TOP1 inhibition were validated via loss-of-function and gain-of-function experiments. Results: We observed two distinct and diverging cancer cell responses - sensitive versus resistant to TOP1 inhibition, which was confirmed by TNBC xenograft mouse models treated by topotecan. TNBC cells exhibited bifurcated temporal patterns of ATR pathway activation upon TOP1 inhibitor treatment. The sensitive TNBC cells showed an "up then down" dynamic pattern of ATR/Chk1 signaling, while the resistant TNBC cells exhibited a "persistently up" profile. On the contrary, opposite temporal patterns of induced expression of MYC, a key regulator and effector of DNA damage, were found in TNBC cells treated by TOP1 inhibitors. Mechanistically, we showed that TOP1-induced JNK signaling upregulated MYC expression. Furthermore, pharmacological inhibition of ATR reversed TNBC cell resistance to topotecan, whereas MYC knockdown and JNK inhibition reduced cancer cell sensitivity. Conclusions: Dynamic temporal profiles of induced ATR/Chk1 and JNK activation as well as MYC expression, may predict cancer cell response to TOP1 inhibitors. JNK activation-mediated constitutive elevation of MYC expression may represent a novel mechanism governing cancer cell sensitivity to TOP1-targeting therapy. Our results may provide implications for identifying TNBC patients who might benefit from the treatment with TOP1 inhibitors.