Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death in the western world, with surgical resection the only curative treatment. Screening programmes involving faecal occult blood tests with periodic endoscopic examination of the bowel can achieve a reduction in mortality of 15–33%. However, despite widely published recommendations for such screening programmes, compliance remains poor. Chemoprevention, defined as the prevention of cancer by the use of pharmacological agents that inhibit or reverse the process of carcinogenesis, might provide an alternative approach to reducing mortality from colorectal cancer. Moreover, therapeutic strategies that use a combination of chemopreventative drugs to target multiple alterations that result in tumour initiation or progression are highly attractive.Colorectal neoplasia is frequently associated with alterations in signalling through the epidermal growth factor (EGF)-family of receptors, as well as changes in the cyclooxygenase (Cox) pathway. Colorectal neoplasia results in increased cell proliferation and cell motility and helps stimulate tumour growth by promoting tumour-associated angiogenesis. Interactions between the EGF and Cox pathways are well documented: EGF induces Cox-2 and overexpression of Cox-2 increases EGF-receptor expression in intestinal epithelial cells. The targeting of their respective pathways by inhibitors has been shown to have potent anti-neoplastic effects, although tumour growth is not completely prevented and there is potential toxicity associated with their long-term use.Torrence et al.1xCombinatorial chemoprevention of intestinal neoplasia. Torrence, C.J. et al. Nat. Med. 2000; 6: 1024–1028Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (446)See all References used a combination therapy involving a newly developed inhibitor of the EGF receptor (EGFR) kinase (EKI-785) and a well-known cyclooxygenase inhibitor (sulindac) to prevent tumour development in the Min mouse model of colorectal cancer. These mice harbour an inactivated APC gene and normally develop multiple intestinal polyps. Mice were treated for 60 days with various combinations of drug–food formulations, after which their intestinal tracts were removed and the number of polyps counted. Individually, the compounds provided significant protection from polyp formation (approximately 50% and 70% reduction, respectively); in combination, they provided nearly complete protection (95–97%). Detailed histopathological staining revealed the presence of numerous microscopic adenomas in all treatment groups, suggesting that the main effect of the chemopreventative agents was on tumour progression rather than on initiation.Chemical modification of EKI-785 resulted in the development of EKI-569, which has improved pharmacokinetics, is better at reducing the number of polyps (87%) and can inhibit EGFR kinase activity in vivo at clinically relevant doses. Use of EKI-569 allowed less-toxic doses of sulindac to be used and, in combination, resulted in protection from tumour development in 95% of Min mice, with nearly 50% of mice having no tumours at all. Detailed histological examinations of the entire gastrointestinal tract revealed no evidence of overt toxicity.It is surprising that Torrence et al.1xCombinatorial chemoprevention of intestinal neoplasia. Torrence, C.J. et al. Nat. Med. 2000; 6: 1024–1028Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (446)See all References used sulindac, a nonselective NSAID inhibitor, rather than one of the readily available selective inhibitors. Nevertheless, it will be fascinating to unravel the molecular and biochemical mechanisms involved in growth suppression by the combination therapies. Most importantly, these results have direct practical implications and suggest that it should be possible to bypass the main toxicity associated with long-term, non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drug treatment in patients.