Shigella flexneri 2A vaccine(Walter Reed Army Institute of Research)

Shigella sonnei live vaccine candidate, WRSS1, which was previously evaluated in US, Israeli and Thai volunteers, was administered orally to Bangladeshi adults and children to assess its safety, clinical tolerability and immunogenicity. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, dose-escalation, age-descending study, 39 adults (18-39 years) and 64 children (5-9 years) were enrolled. Each adult cohort (n = 13) received one dose of 3x10⁴, or three doses of 3 × 10⁵ or 3 × 10⁶ colony forming unit (CFU) of WRSS1 (n = 10) or placebo (n = 3). Each child cohort (n = 16) received one dose of 3x10³, or three doses of 3x10⁴, 3x10⁵, or 3 × 10⁶ CFU WRSS1 (n = 12) or placebo (n = 4). WRSS1 elicited mostly mild and transient reactogenicity events in adults and children. In the 3 × 10⁶ dose group, 50% of the adults shed the vaccine; no shedding was seen in children. At the highest dose, 100% of adults and 40% of children responded with a ≥ 4-fold increase of S. sonnei LPS-specific IgA antibody in lymphocyte supernatant (ALS). At the same dose, 63% of adults and 70% of children seroconverted with IgA to LPS, while in placebo, 33% of adults and 18% of children seroconverted. Both the vaccinees and placebos responded with fecal IgA to LPS, indicating persistent exposure to Shigella infections. In conclusion, WRSS1 was found safe up to 10⁶ CFU dose and immunogenic in adults and children in Bangladesh. These data indicate that live, oral Shigella vaccine candidates, including WRSS1 can potentially be evaluated in toddlers and infants (<2 years of age), who comprise the target population in an endemic environment.

Shigella causes diarrhea and dysentery through contaminated food and water. Shigella sonnei live vaccine candidates WRSs2 and WRSs3 are attenuated principally by the loss of VirG(IcsA) that prevents bacterial spread within the colonic epithelium. In this respect they are similar to the clinically tested vaccine candidate WRSS1. However, WRSs2 and WRSs3 are further attenuated by loss of senA, senB and WRSs3 also lacks msbB2. As previously shown in cell culture assays and in small animal models, these additional gene deletions reduced the levels of enterotoxicity and endotoxicity of WRSs2 and WRSs3, potentially making them safer than WRSS1. However the behavior of these second-generation VirG(IcsA)-based vaccine candidates in eliciting an immune response in a gastrointestinal model of infection has not been evaluated. In this study, WRSs2 and WRSs3 were nasogastrically administered to rhesus monkeys that were evaluated for colonization, as well as for systemic and mucosal immune responses. Both vaccine candidates were safe in rhesus monkeys and behaved comparably to WRSS1 in bacterial excretion rates that demonstrated robust intestinal colonization. Furthermore, humoral and mucosal immune responses elicited against bacterial antigens appeared similar in all categories across all three strains indicating that the additional gene deletions did not compromise the immunogenicity of these vaccine candidates. Based on data from previous clinical trials with WRSS1, it is likely that, WRSs2 and WRSs3 will not only be safer in human volunteers but will generate comparable levels of systemic and mucosal immune responses that were achieved with WRSS1.