January 20, 2015
By
Mark Terry
, BioSpace.com Breaking News Staff
Speculation is growing about what contract research organization (CRO)
Pfizer
will
choose
as a third alliance partner.
Rumors
spun this week that
Quintiles
was the front runner, but other sources suggested a privately-owned CRO was to be chosen.
At the April 2014 Partnerships in Clinical Trials (PCT) conference held in Las Vegas, a
Pfizer
spokeswoman indicated the company was satisfied with their CRO contracts with Icon and
Parexel
, but suggested a third might be chosen. “We are exploring the option of bringing in a third alliance partner but we haven’t made any announcements on this yet.”
At that time,
Ross Muken
, an analyst with
ISI Group
suggested
Quintiles
. “
Parexel
and Icon shouldn’t be that impacted from a volume standpoint.”
A
Quintiles
spokesperson said in a statement, that it “does not comment on specific business development efforts,” adding, “
Pfizer
has been and remains a customer.”
Two privately-owned CROs,
PPD
and
inVentiv
, considered by some to be the lead prospects if, indeed,
Pfizer
opts for a third alliance partner, have been ambiguous in their responses to the media.
“As a general policy,” said
PPD
director of corporate communications and public affairs,
Ned Glascock
, in a statement, “and because of confidentiality agreements with our clients, I hope you will understand that
PPD
neither confirms nor denies involvement in any specific study or work with any specific client.”
“We have a long-standing relationship with
Pfizer
,” said
inVentiv
spokeswoman
Danielle DeForge
in a statement, “and continue to provide them with a wide range of best-in-class CRO services to help them achieve their clinical goals faster and with higher quality results.”
Pfizer
is withholding specifics, merely stating that it is looking a third clinical trial contractor to supplement existing vendors.
On Jan. 7
BioSpace
reported
that Boston, Mass.-based
Parexel International (PRXL)
had announced plans to hire 450
GlaxoSmithKline
employees and create its own dedicated business unit to service
GSK
in the U.S.
Parexel
indicated it expects to continue having plenty of business with big pharma in 2015, regardless of whether they face competition with one of their big clients,
Pfizer
.
“
Pfizer
already utilizes other vendors for specialized services outside Icon (ICLR) and
Parexel
,” said
Evercore ISI
analyst
Ross Muken
in a statement. “We view it is unlikely that it proves to be a negative for either player on an absolute basis. If
Pfizer
adds an additional partner it is likely to be incremental to existing plans.”
It has been suggested that
Parexel
had taken on a disproportionate number of
Pfizer
studies that were in progress, and many of those studies wrapped up in the first half of 2014. “I think it’s just normal ebbs and flows,” said
Parexel
CEO
Josef von Rickenbach
in a statement, “nothing particular to be read into the relationship.”
BioSpace Temperature Poll
What Are Your Predictions for the Price Bidding War?
The market has been buzzing about an escalating price war between large payers like
Express Scripts
and Big Pharma. Multiple deals last week showed
Gilead
forming
exclusive pacts
and smaller companies like
Kite Pharma
starting talks early. What do you think will be the effect on prices? BioSpace wants your opinion!
var _polldaddy = [] || _polldaddy; _polldaddy.push( { type: "iframe", auto: "1", domain: "biospace.polldaddy.com/s/", id: "what-are-your-predictions-for-price-bidding-war", placeholder: "pd_1421711966" } ); (function(d,c,j){if(!document.getElementById(j)){var pd=d.createElement(c),s;pd.id=j;pd.src=(' '==document.location.protocol)?' ':' ';s=document.getElementsByTagName(c)[0];s.parentNode.insertBefore(pd,s);}}(document,'script','pd-embed'));