OBJECTIVEThis study evaluates a new decision support tool-a computer/mobile application designed to align with the latest ESGO guidelines, French practices, and molecular biology data-to aid in decision-making for endometrial cancer management.METHODSAn observational, multicenter, retrospective study was conducted. It compared management decisions from multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTBs) with those suggested by the application for patients with histologically confirmed endometrial cancer, irrespective of their FIGO stage. Each center included the last 20 cases discussed in multidisciplinary tumor boards between May to December 2022.RESULTSThirteen centers participated: eight university hospitals (61.5 %), four cancer centers (30.8 %), and one private center (7.7 %). A total of 259 patients were included, with a mean age of 69 years (range 30-96 years). Most patients had endometrioid tumors (77.2 %), low-grade (62.6 %), FIGO stage IA (41.3 %), no lymphovascular invasion (77.9 %), and a non-specific molecular profile (50.6 %). The application's recommendations matched the MTB decisions 76.6 % of the time. Discrepancies arose mainly from the non-administration of brachytherapy (22.8 %), rare presentations or pathological discordance (22.8 %), and patients' deteriorated conditions precluding standard treatments (19.3 %).CONCLUSIONThe SFOG campus application demonstrates a high concordance with multidisciplinary tumor board decisions, indicating its potential as an efficient, and valuable tool for managing endometrial cancer.