Ankara Bilkent City Hospital

This study aims to compare the over-the-top (OTT) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACL-R) technique with the anteromedial ACL-R + lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET). It aims to provide valuable insights into two different surgical approaches aimed at enhancing knee stability. The over-the-top ACL-R technique, which involves routing the graft over the posterior aspect of the lateral femoral condyle, is known for its simplicity and ability to preserve the anatomical footprint of the ACL. Although a non-anatomical reconstruction, the OTT technique has shown comparable clinical results and good return to sports (RTS) ratios when compared to the conventional ACLR alone. It is also favored in revision surgeries or when there is difficulty accessing the femoral tunnel through conventional approaches. However, concerns regarding its ability to fully restore rotational stability persist, especially in high-demand athletes.
In contrast, the anteromedial portal technique for ACL-R, combined with LET, has gained popularity due to its effectiveness in controlling both anterior tibial translation and rotational instability. LET augments the intra-articular reconstruction by providing additional restraint against pivot shifts, which can be critical in patients with high-risk profiles for re-injury, such as those participating in pivoting sports. Comparing these two approaches in terms of clinical outcomes, graft integrity, rotational control, and return-to-sport rates with a prospectively randomized controlled trial will help clarify their roles in contemporary ACL surgery and could guide surgeons in choosing the most appropriate method based on patient-specific factors.

The effect of two different positions on spinal anesthesia in hip fracture surgery

Longitudinal meniscal tears are a type of meniscal injury characterized by a displaced fragment of the meniscus that flips over into the joint, often resembling a buckle or handle. These tears typically occur in the medial meniscus and are often associated with traumatic knee injuries, particularly in athletes.
The displaced meniscal fragment can cause mechanical symptoms such as locking, clicking, or catching of the knee, as well as pain and swelling. If not properly treated, buckle-handle meniscal tears can lead to further complications, including chronic knee instability, increased risk of osteoarthritis, and persistent joint pain.Repairing a longitudinal meniscal tear offers several advantages over partial meniscectomy, particularly in preserving knee function and preventing long-term complications.
Meniscal repair aims to restore the integrity of the meniscus, which plays a crucial role in load distribution, shock absorption, and joint stability.
Utilizing a fibrin clot during the repair of a buckle-handle meniscal tear can enhance the healing process and improve surgical outcomes. Fibrin clots act as a biological scaffold, promoting tissue regeneration by providing a matrix that facilitates cellular migration and proliferation.
The purpose of this study was to compare longitudinal meniscal tear repair reinforced with fibrin clot with routine end-to-end repair in a prospective randomized controlled trial.