CLASSYS, Inc.

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is well-documented for skin rejuvenation, lifting, and tightening. However, its synergistic effects with topical agents, enhanced by HIFU-induced vibration and heat, remain underexplored.

To evaluate clinical and photographic outcomes of HIFU combined with a topical agent versus the topical agent alone.

This non-randomized controlled trial involved 20 female volunteers (ages 30-55) divided into two groups. Group A (n = 10) received two HIFU sessions combined with a topical agent containing glutathione and hyaluronic acid. Group B (n = 10) received the topical agent alone. Outcomes were assessed using digital photography, patient satisfaction surveys, and the A-One Smart^™ system for fine wrinkles, hyperpigmentation, and hydration. Skin brightening was evaluated with the Global Esthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS).

Group A showed significant reductions in fine wrinkles (6.25 ± 2.00 mm to 3.10 ± 1.62 mm), improved hyperpigmentation (3.50 ± 0.80 to 2.10 ± 1.05), and increased hydration (28 ± 10 to 55 ± 11) (all p < 0.05). Over two-thirds of Group A reported significant improvements, with no complications. Group B showed minimal, non-significant changes (p > 0.05), with only 30% reporting noticeable improvements.

Combining HIFU with a topical agent significantly enhances skin quality and brightness without adverse effects.

Various treatment methods are used for noninvasive body contouring. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a newly designed cryolipolysis device using a three-dimensional cooling method for abdominal fat reduction. Twenty-five participants with clinically apparent abdominal fat tissue participated in the study. The thickness of fat tissue below the umbilicus level was measured using a caliper at baseline and 12 weeks after the first treatment. The height of abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue on ultrasonography and participant satisfaction were assessed at every visit for 16 weeks. All adverse events (AEs) during the study period were recorded. p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Twenty-four participants completed this study; the mean BMI of participants was 29.34 ± 2.36 kg/m² . The mean thickness of abdominal subcutaneous fat was significantly lower at 12 weeks (40.4 ± 6.8 mm, p < 0.001) than at baseline (49.3 ± 8.5 mm). Differences in the height of abdominal subcutaneous fat compared to that at baseline were 1.02 ± 0.41 cm (12 weeks, p < 0.001) and 1.13 ± 0.44 cm (16 weeks, p < 0.001). Rates of abdominal subcutaneous fat reduction at 12 and 16 weeks compared to that at baseline were 28.45% and 31.13%, respectively. The ratio of abdominal circumference to hip circumference at 12 and 16 weeks was significantly decreased compared to that at baseline. Most participants (95.8%) reported improvement in satisfaction scores at 16 weeks. There were no serious AEs during the entire study period. The study demonstrated the efficacy of a noninvasive cryolipolysis device using a three-dimensional cooling method for reducing abdominal subcutaneous fat.

Treatment options for pseudogynecomastia are limited, and the demand for noninvasive breast fat reduction is increasing.

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a cold-induced lipolysis device for treating pseudogynecomastia.

In this 16-week prospective trial, a total of 15 male patients with pseudogynecomastia were treated twice with cryolipolysis. The primary endpoint was a change in the chest circumference from baseline at posttreatment week 8. Secondary endpoints were changes in body weight, fat thickness assessed using ultrasonography, independent evaluator- and patient-rated improvement, and Simon's gynecomastia class (SGC) grading.

The primary assessment, a reduction of 3.05 cm in the mean chest circumference at 8 weeks post-treatment compared to baseline, was statistically significant. The treatment effect was cumulative, with a steady decrease in chest circumference and fat thickness over the 16-week study period. The mean pain score immediately after the first session of treatment was 2.0±1.36, based on a scale of 0~10, with a score of 10 being the worst pain ever experienced. The pain decreased substantially after the end of the procedure.

Cryolipolysis was demonstrated to be an effective and safe option for reducing breast fat in pseudogynecomastia. Male with mild to moderate breast enlargement without skin excess can be ideal candidates.