Centre Hospitalier De Niort

The main objective is to assess the psycholinguistic and graphomotor characteristics of written production in patients with ASD.
The secondary objectives are:
Identifying links between specific deficits of ASD and difficulties in written production.
Identifying links between the severity of ASD and difficulties in written production.
The primary evaluation criterion is the quantity of written production, namely the number of words produced in 5 minutes on a text copying task (BHK) and in 15 minutes on each of the two written production tasks (descriptive and persuasive).
The secondary evaluation criteria are:
Graphomotor indicators of written production (writing speed, pre-writing time, pause time, writing time, handwriting size, results obtained in BHK (number of words produced, letter height, line parallelism, telescoping, ambiguous letters).
Cognitive and psycholinguistic indicators of written production (presence of titles, presence of paragraphs, number of sentences, number of words per sentence, lexical richness, lexical field, number of action verbs, morphological complexity, number of syntactic markers related to oneself, number of syntactic markers related to others, number of spelling errors, evaluation of the overall quality of the produced text).
Results obtained in tests (writing habits questionnaire, Autism Diagnostic Observation Scale (second edition), Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (fourth edition) - Similarities subtest, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (fourth edition) - Vocabulary subtest, Rey Figure, MASC).

Schizophrenia affects about 1% of the world's population. According to the WHO, it was one of the ten most worrying pathologies of the twenty-first century. The situation of psychic disability that results impacted the entire life course. This disease is characterized by positive symptoms (delirium, hallucination, psychotic agitation) and negative symptoms and disorganization (destructuring of thought, language and behavior). Cognitive disorders are easily measurable in the spectrum of schizophrenia and are quantifiable with some tools to measure the level of performance of the individual in different areas.
In these patients apathy is found in one out of two cases (prevalence of 51%), so it is a widespread negative symptom. Apathy corresponds to a pathology of voluntary action that can exist in different forms, resulting from the alteration of one or more mechanisms. It is a predictor of functional outcomes, regardless of positive symptoms or depression.
Studies of people with head injuries have found a link between frontal cognitive impairment and apathy. The recognition, the identification of the dimensional mechanisms of apathy and the understanding of the links with cognitive disorders are therefore a major issue in the improvement of the functional prognosis. Moreover, these mechanisms are currently little studied in the spectrum of schizophrenia.
There are currently questionnaires to show the presence or absence of apathy, such as the Apathy Evaluation Scale or the Lille Apathy Rating Scale. However most scales offer a global apathy score and the proposed treatments are limited due to the difficulty in identifying the dimensions and understanding of the underlying mechanisms of their own.
The potentiality of apathy to become a source of disability is now widely recognized. It is therefore important to consider the expression of this handicap in terms of the repercussions that this disorder may have on the daily lives of patients. There are questionnaires to measure the functional autonomy of patients with a psychic disorder. Apathy is also an obstacle to supporting patients in psychiatry.
The lack of knowledge and underestimation of apathy and its mechanisms in schizophrenia, in addition to overworking the psychiatric health sector, favor a drift towards the institutionalization of the person, with its medico-economic consequences on the system.