AbstractBackgroundPaediatric forearm fractures are a common childhood injury that often necessitates flexible intramedullary (IM) nailing; however, the procurement of these nails is typically dictated by hospital contracts, leaving surgeons with minimal influence over choice of implant.ObjectivesTo assess the difference in peri-operative outcomes of paediatric forearm fractures based on flexible nailing implants used from different manufacturers.Study Design and MethodsThis retrospective study reviewed paediatric patients listed for forearm flexible nailing from a single unit between August 2020 and November 2024, with a change in implant provider in June 2023. Data on patient demographics, procedure performed, operative time, intra-operative change of surgical plan, need to open fracture site and number of implants used per case were collected. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS.ResultsA total of 73 patients (average age 9 years) underwent IM fixation or conversion to ORIF; 44 patients were operated using implant A and 29 patients using implant B. Usage of implant B was significantly correlated with an increase in conversion to open, from 31.82% to 58.62% (p=0.031, OR=3.04), intra-operative change of surgical plan, from 36.36% to 65.52% (p=0.018, OR=3.33) and implant wastage, from 6.57% to 23.81% (p=0.011, OR=4.407).ConclusionsOur study confirms that implants from different suppliers, though approved for the same indications, can have substantial differences in peri-operative outcomes, causing increased harm to paediatric patients.Surgeons should involve themselves in proper consultation with hospital procurement when deciding on changing surgical implants contracts to ensure best and safe surgical practice for their patients.