Consorzio Futuro in Ricerca

The SAMCRO is an all comers, prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label study with blinded adjudicated evaluation of outcomes (PROBE). The diagnosis of angina in non obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) will be confirmed with coronary artery angiography and with the invasive assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and coronary vasomotion. At least 120 ANOCA patients with invasively confirmed CMD will be randomized to i) multi-domain lifestyle intervention (experimental arm) vs. ii) standard of care (control arm). All patients will undergo follow-up visits at 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months. The study endpoints will be the improvement of angina status and quality of life as assessed by validated questionnaires at one year. All participants in the multi-domain lifestyle group will receive five different kinds of intervention: i) dietary counselling, ii) strict management of cardiovascular (CV) and metabolic risk factors, iii) tailoring of medical therapy on the basis of the invasive assessment of CMD and coronary vasomotion, iv) exercise training and v) psychological intervention. Patients randomized to the control group will be managed according to current guidelines. The angina status will be assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). Quality of life will be assessed using the EuroQoL (EQ5D-5L). Anxiety and depression will be assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI).

The INROAD is an investigator-driven, prospective, study in which patients undergoing coronary sinus reducer implantation (Reducer) for chronic refractory angina undergo evaluation of the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) at the time of implantation, and at 4 months follow-up

Elderly patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel disease are the highest risk population with the worst prognosis. No trial has ever been designed to optimize their outcome. The actual real-life standard of care is, in the best of the cases, culprit only revascularization. However, real-life registries show that outcome of MI elderly patients treated with this strategy is far from being optimal with at least a 15% rate of cardiac death or myocardial infarction at 1 year. To date, studies on this population have been focused on devices (bare metal stent vs biodegradable drug eluting stent) or on dual antiplatelet regimen (long vs short) and no study was focused on evaluating if complete revascularization is able to improve the prognosis in these patients. The contemporary complete revascularization is represented by a functionally-driven revascularization that recently showed to significantly reduce myocardial infarction rate and outperformed an angio-complete revascularization. Thus, our hypothesis is that a functionally-driven complete revascularization in elderly patients with MI and multivessel disease may improve prognosis compared to the actual standard of care in these patients, namely culprit only revascularization. Being a "strategy" trial, we identified the patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE) as primary outcome of interest (all cause death, any MI, any stroke, any revascularization).
Several pre-specified substudies have been planned. A detailed list of the substudies is available in the website of the trial (http://www.thefiretrial.com)