BACKGROUNDMost people in the United States with asthma use therapies for intermittent/mild-persistent disease; however, exacerbations and death occur in patients with infrequent symptoms or labeled as mild asthma.OBJECTIVETo evaluate relationships between short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) use, exacerbations, and maintenance adherence in intermittent/mild-persistent asthma.METHODSRetrospective cohort study using US Merative MarketScan administrative claims (January 2010 to December 2017) for patients aged 12 years or older treated as intermittent/mild-persistent asthma. Patients were indexed on a random SABA claim, with 12 months continuous enrollment pre- and post-index. Post-index SABA groups were defined as low (index fill only), medium (2-3 fills), and high (≥4 fills). Severe exacerbations were compared within the treatment, SABA fill, and adherence (medication possession ratio) groups through unadjusted comparison of proportions, χ2, and odds ratios (OR [95% CI]); P less than or equal to .05.RESULTSA total of 533,679 patients were included: 68.1% female; mean age (SD) 34.6 (18.3) years; 70.0% intermittent (SABA only) and 30.0% mild-persistent (8.6% low-dose inhaled corticosteroid [ICS]; 21.4% leukotriene modifier [LM]). The proportion of patients with high SABA fills differed among the treatments: SABA only (14.8%), low-dose ICS (37.0%), and LM (25.5%) (P < .001). The proportion experiencing 1 or more exacerbations was higher in SABA only (61.2%) vs low-dose ICS (40.4%) or LM (50.4%): OR (95% CI) 2.32 (2.28-2.37) and 1.55 (1.53-1.57), respectively (both P < .001). The medication possession ratio was less than 50% in 59.3% of patients with mild-persistent asthma; however, adherence was only related to exacerbations in the high SABA group.CONCLUSIONPatients treated as intermittent/mild-persistent asthma rely on SABA and experience exacerbations. Shifting from SABA only to an anti-inflammatory rescue therapy could decrease morbidity.