Beractant

Objective Premature infants are at the risk of developing respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). Beractants and poractants are two commonly used natural surfactants. This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the incidence of pulmonary complications between beractant and poractant treatment groups. Study Design This study evaluated 29 patients treated with beractant and 49 patients treated with poractant. The primary outcome was the incidence of air leak syndrome (ALS) and pulmonary hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes included mortality and pulmonary outcomes, such as mechanical ventilation duration, oxygen dependence duration, fraction of inspired oxygen, and mean airway pressure (MAP) requirement. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors for significant primary outcomes. Results No significant difference was found in the demographics between the two groups. A significantly higher incidence of pulmonary hemorrhage was observed in the poractant group (14.3 vs. 0.0%, p = 0.038). The difference in the incidence of ALS between the groups was insignificant (p = 0.536). Logistic regression for the incidence of pulmonary hemorrhage identified coagulopathy as the only significant independent risk factor (odds ratio 39.855, 95% confidence interval [2.912–545.537]; p = 0.006). Secondary outcomes in both treatment groups were similar, except that patients in the poractant group had a higher MAP before surfactant therapy (9 vs. 8 cmH2O, p < 0.001). Conclusion This study showed a significantly higher incidence of pulmonary hemorrhage in the poractant group. Coagulopathy was identified as an independent risk factor for pulmonary hemorrhage. Future long-term prospective studies are essential to establish the temporal and causal relationships between coagulopathy and pulmonary hemorrhage in premature infants receiving surfactant therapy for RDS; hence, there is the need for a screening protocol before surfactant administration. Key Points

To identify and analyze the factors leading to extubation failure among very low birth weight infants in a specific tertiary care setting in Al Ain, emphasizing clinical and demographic variables. The study used medical data of Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) infants admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) from 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2019, and evaluated the incidence and risk factors associated with extubation failure.

Data was collected from the hospital's electronic records and tabulated in Excel sheets, with extubation failure defined as reintubation due to deterioration of respiratory condition within seven days post-extubation. The data was collected from the period of 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2019. Inclusion criteria included babies admitted to the NICU with a gestational age of ≤ 32 weeks, or of birth weight ≤1500 grams who were intubated within the first seven days of life. Results were analyzed using SPSS software, version 9.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago) to determine the risk factors for extubation failure and short-term outcomes.

Gestational age, birth weight, antenatal steroids, mode of delivery, number of Survanta® (beractant intratracheal suspension) doses, Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP), Mean Airway Pressure (MAP), Mean Arterial Pressure (Blood Pressure (BP)), and Infectious Diseases (ID) (indicated by a positive blood culture) were found to be the key predictors of extubation failure in very low birth weight infants at a tertiary care hospital in Al Ain. The most common reasons for reintubation were FiO2 > 50% (23.53%), followed by Respiratory Acidosis (20.59%). Other factors, including maternal chorioamnionitis, Apgar scores, indication for intubation, caffeine, and pre-and post-extubation laboratory values, comorbidities, and hemoglobin (Hgb), creatinine and sodium levels were found to have no effect on the success of extubations.

The results of this research indicate that factors such as gestational age, birth weight, prenatal steroid use, delivery method, the quantity of Survanta® doses, PEEP, MAP, MAP (BP), and ID (+ve blood culture) were the primary determinants of unsuccessful extubation in VLBW babies at a tertiary healthcare facility in Al Ain. The predominant cause for needing reintubation was a FiO2 level above 50%, followed by Respiratory Acidosis. Additional ®®investigations are required to validate these findings and pinpoint other potential predictors of extubation failure within this demographic.