Article
作者: Reed, Sierra ; Bakken, Julie ; Kasal, Darshan N ; Ykema, Matthew R ; Mohamath, Raodoh ; Hanson, Derek ; Botta, Davide ; Akther, Jobaida ; Cross, Noah ; Silva-Sanchez, Aaron ; Cheatwood, Isabella R ; Tipper, Jennifer L ; Lund, Frances E ; Zhou, Fen ; Casper, Corey ; Jennewein, Madeleine F ; Singh, Jasneet ; Kalange, Davies ; Gerhardt, Alana ; Battisti, Peter ; Beaver, Samuel ; Voigt, Emily A ; Schultz, Michael D ; Harrod, Kevin S ; King, R Glenn ; Randall, Troy D ; Foote, Jeremy B
While mRNA vaccines have been effective in combating SARS-CoV-2, the waning of vaccine-induced antibody responses and lack of vaccine-induced respiratory tract immunity contribute to ongoing infection and transmission. In this work, we compare and contrast intranasal (i.n.) and intramuscular (i.m.) administration of a SARS-CoV-2 replicon vaccine delivered by a nanostructured lipid carrier (NLC). Both i.m. and i.n. vaccines induce potent systemic serum neutralizing antibodies, bone marrow-resident immunoglobulin G-secreting cells, and splenic T cell responses. The i.n. vaccine additionally induces robust respiratory mucosal immune responses, including SARS-CoV-2-reactive lung-resident memory T cell populations. As a booster following previous i.m. vaccination, the i.n. vaccine also elicits the development of mucosal virus-specific T cells. Both the i.m.- and i.n.-administered vaccines durably protect hamsters from infection-associated morbidity upon viral challenge, significantly reducing viral loads and preventing challenged hamsters from transmitting virus to naive cagemates. This replicon-NLC vaccine's potent systemic immunogenicity, and additional mucosal immunogenicity when delivered i.n., may be key for combating SARS-CoV-2 and other respiratory pathogens.