US presidential election winner Donald Trump has promised to let his ally Robert F. Kennedy Jr. “go wild” on drug and food policy. While Kennedy’s exact role in a potential Trump administration is unclear, it could result in unconventional picks to lead key health posts, including the FDA.
One of the emerging names to run the FDA in a Trump administration is Casey Means,
according to the
Washington Post
. Means, 37, trained as a surgeon after graduating from Stanford Medicine. Instead of practicing medicine, however, she became a health tech entrepreneur and founded the company Levels, which offers continuous glucose monitoring to the general public and provides food advice with the goal of improving health outcomes.
In recent months, Means and her brother, Calley — a former drug and food industry lobbyist — have made the rounds on conservative media, appearing on both Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson’s shows. In interviews, in her book “Good Energy” and in her online newsletter, Casey Means has outlined a policy vision that would be a significant break in US drug and vaccine policy, as well as its approach to scientific research.
Endpoints News
reviewed many of Means’ public comments to analyze what they would mean for drug, vaccine and health policy. That includes remarks raising questions about a link between vaccines and autism, the causes of cancer, and whether the use of drugs is linked to a rise in overall disease.
Means didn’t respond to a request for comment. At a recent health technology conference in Las Vegas, she declined to say whether she’d accept a top health agency position if nominated.
“My passion is to help change the tide of the American chronic disease epidemic across the lifespan, and no matter who gets into office, I will be there to help support and educate about this topic to any listening ear,” Means said at the conference.
The Trump campaign and representatives for Kennedy also didn’t respond to requests for comment. In the volatile aftermath of the campaign, it’s far from certain that Kennedy will be as influential as he has seemed in the waning days of the campaign, or whether a more traditional policy leader on health and drug policy might emerge. Trump could also go with another name, like Johns Hopkins professor and author Marty Makary, another name mentioned by the Post. And there are also limits to what any political appointee can do at an agency like the FDA, where many decisions are made by career staff.
But the potential for Means or somebody like her to influence drug policy is already
raising concerns in biotech and pharma circles
— an industry Means has extensively criticized as more interested in selling drugs than keeping patients from getting sick.
Eric Benner, a pediatrician at Duke University and co-founder of Tellus Therapeutics — which is developing neonatal care drugs — said he could envision a scenario where Means or another Kennedy-influenced FDA chief might block a new drug application based on the class of therapy, regardless of how safety studies are conducted.
“It takes an unbiased FDA to be able to look at the data,” Benner said. “We can all point to vaccines as being probably highest on the list of difficult things to get approved through an RFK Jr.-appointed FDA. But that could trickle down into all kinds of different areas.”
Kennedy is a longtime vaccine skeptic and environmental advocate who dropped out of the race to endorse Trump in August. His “Make America Healthy Again” platform — a riff on Trump’s campaign slogan — emerged as a priority from various members of the former president’s camp, including Trump himself.
On CNN late last month, Cantor Fitzgerald CEO and Trump transition chair Howard Lutnick
questioned the effectiveness
of vaccines, saying, “Let’s give him the data. I think it’ll be pretty cool to give him the data. Let’s see what he comes up with.” And speaking to NBC News on Sunday, Trump said
he’d consider Kennedy’s proposal
for banning some childhood vaccines.
“Well, I’m going to talk to [Kennedy] and talk to other people, and I’ll make a decision, but he’s a very talented guy and has strong views,” Trump told NBC.
Vaccination has proven to be one of the biggest medical advances of the last 50 years, according to
a May paper from
The Lancet
. Since 1974, researchers found that routine childhood vaccinations have saved 154 million lives, the vast majority of which (146 million) are children under 5. In 2024, a vaccinated child under 10 years old is also 40% more likely to live to their next birthday than a child with no history of vaccination.
While Means hasn’t outright endorsed Kennedy’s view that vaccines cause autism, she has questioned their safety more broadly. The way placebo-controlled studies are currently designed and run cannot fully capture how safe they are in an environment with so many environmental and food contaminants, Means said on Rogan’s podcast.
“Yeah I bet that one vaccine probably isn’t causing autism, but what about the 20 that they’re getting before 18 months?” she asked Rogan. “We don’t look at it in a synergistic way, and so that’s a big problem.”
There is no evidence to suggest vaccines cause autism. A single academic paper on the topic, published in 1998, has been debunked multiple times and retracted.
There are already early signs in the US that anti-vaccine sentiment has led to the reemergence of some infectious diseases. In 2019, the US saw its biggest measles outbreak since 1992,
according to the CDC
. And earlier this year, the CDC said measles cases in 2024 were seven times higher than the period following that outbreak from 2020 to 2023.
But the type of research on vaccines that Means appears to be calling for would be incredibly difficult to conduct. 4D Molecular Therapeutics CEO David Kirn also questioned the feasibility of a new trial looking at each children’s vaccine’s effect on the body. There would be too many different variables to test in a way that is both financially and scientifically viable, he said.
“It would be almost impossible to study that,” Kirn said. “It would be hundreds of thousands of people that you’d have to follow for 10 to 20 years.”
Means has also weighed in on the amount of medications Americans take, saying that they coincide with an increase in disease.
“The more SSRIs we prescribe, the more depression goes up. The more metformin we prescribe, the more type 2 diabetes there is,” Means told Rogan. “We prescribe 221 million statins a year, but heart disease is still one of the leading killers. It doesn’t make any sense.”
And she’s likewise criticized the booming use of GLP-1 drugs for weight loss, saying that companies are rushing to get the use of the drugs approved in children, and making people dependent on them. “We are being gaslit to think that the pharmaceutical approach is the only legitimate science,” she said on Rogan’s podcast.
Former InCarda CEO Grace Colón, whose company developed drugs for heart disease, told Endpoints that Means’ comments about drug use and the rise of disease were “disappointing” from someone who could potentially lead the FDA. The increase in high blood pressure prescriptions is a sign the pharmaceutical business model is working as intended, Colón said, because they are almost all generics and cost patients relatively little, saving billions of dollars in healthcare costs.
“It’s the classic pitfall of correlation and causation,” Colón said. “Yes, all of these things are increasing. But where has she provided evidence to say that there is a direct result?”
Means is also a major advocate for healthier eating, getting more exercise and optimizing lifestyle choices. It’s a viewpoint connected to the tragic death of her mother from cancer in 2021.
One morning in January of that year, Means said her mother was on her daily hike with her father when she suddenly felt a sharp pain in her stomach. After going to a doctor and running some tests, the results came back the next day with stage 4 pancreatic cancer. Less than two weeks later, she died at 71.
Starting in her 40s, Means’ mother began taking drugs for high blood pressure, and added other medicine for high cholesterol and prediabetes later in life, but she ended up getting cancer anyway. This, Means said in her book, is emblematic of a healthcare system focused on maximizing revenue rather than preventing illness.
She dedicated her book to her mother, describing her pancreatic cancer as a “preventable metabolic condition.”
Means said she saw similar instances of what she describes as confounding illnesses while working in her medical residency. Patients in their 30s with migraines would come in and also have diagnoses for type 2 diabetes, depression and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), among other maladies. She says she began to realize how all the different systems in the body are connected through these experiences and were the reason she launched her Oregon wellness clinic.
A central theme of Means’ book boils down to how the prevention of metabolic syndrome, a constellation of conditions that raise people’s risk of heart disease and diabetes, can provide long-term health benefits beyond what the medical establishment typically tells patients. By keeping one’s metabolic health in check from a younger age, an individual can also drastically lower their chances to get cancer, Alzheimer’s disease, liver disease and respiratory infections.
There is some scientific basis for the idea, said Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association. Most Americans eat high-calorie processed foods that are not healthier than other options.
But Benjamin’s biggest concern with Means, or any other Kennedy-aligned figure, is the tendency to draw conclusions about the links between nutrition and disease that don’t have much evidence backing them up. While there are some cancers where obesity is a risk, there are also many people who get cancer despite sticking to high-protein or vegetarian diets.
“There’s clearly evidence that diet and exercise and what you eat and how much you eat, etc., influences your body weight,” Benjamin said. “Now, having said that, I think that these broad statements about all the things that go wrong in our body are purely due to what you eat, that’s over the top and far too simplistic.”