Kitasato Daiichi Sankyo Vaccine Co., Ltd.

Four neuraminidase (NA) inhibitors and an RNA synthesis inhibitor were recently approved and are currently in clinical use for influenza. Among NA inhibitors, oseltamivir phosphate (OSE, Tamiflu^®) and zanamivir are approved worldwide, whereas peramivir and laninamivir octanoate (LAN, Inavir^®) are regionally approved for human use. Therefore, OSE has been used to treat infections of highly pathogenic influenza viruses, such as H5N1 and H7N9, which caused epidemic in southeast Asia and Egypt, and China, respectively. Generally, OSE is administered twice daily for 5 days by oral administration, and LAN once by inhalation for completing influenza therapy. In this study, we compared the efficacy of OSE and LAN administered according to the regimens in mice infected with highly lethal influenza viruses. The drugs were administered at the early and late stages of infection, which correspond to mild and severe inflammation in the lungs, respectively. Based on the drugs' regimens for human, a single administration of LAN at both stages of inflammation showed superior efficacy to repeated administration of OSE. LAN, as in OSE, could also be efficacious in treating severe influenza in humans.

In contrast to current ether- or detergent-disrupted "split" vaccines (SVs) for influenza, inactivated whole influenza virus particle vaccines (WPVs) retain the original virus structure and components and as such may confer similar immunity to natural infection. In a collaboration between academia and industry, the potential of WPV as a new seasonal influenza vaccine was investigated. Each of the four seasonal influenza vaccine manufacturers in Japan prepared WPVs and SVs from the same batches of purified influenza virus. Both mice and monkeys vaccinated with the WPVs exhibited superior immune responses to those vaccinated with the corresponding SVs. Vaccination with A/California/07/2009 (H1N1) WPV enabled mice to survive a lethal challenge dose of homologous virus whereas those vaccinated with SV succumbed to infection within 6 days. Furthermore, mice vaccinated with WPV induced substantial numbers of multifunctional CD8⁺ T cells, important for control of antigenically drifted influenza virus strains. In addition, cytokines and chemokines were detected at early time points in the sera of mice vaccinated with WPV but not in those animals vaccinated with SV. These results indicate that WPVs induce enhanced innate and adaptive immune responses compared to equivalent doses of SVs. Notably, WPV at one fifth of the dose of SV was able to induce potent immunity with limited production of IL-6, one of the pyrogenic cytokines. We thus propose that WPVs with balanced immunogenicity and safety may set a new global standard for seasonal influenza vaccines.

In an attempt to understand the unique toxicity of adjuvanted vaccines, we studied how toxicity develops over time following vaccine administration. In addition to on- and off-target toxicity typically observed with general pharmaceuticals, we observed toxicity associated with both the generation and the broad action of effectors (antibodies and/or cytotoxic T lymphocytes, CTLs). The impact on effector generation appears to be related to local tolerance specific to the adjuvant. The vaccine immune response by effectors serves to demonstrate species relevance as outlined in the recent WHO guideline on the nonclinical evaluation of adjuvanted vaccines. When regarded as pharmaceuticals that function at sites of local administration, adjuvants have inherent on- and off-target toxicity. On-target toxicity of the adjuvant is typically associated with effector generation, and could vary depending on animal species. Therefore, the use of species with sensitivity to adjuvants described in the WHO guidelines is required to evaluate the toxicity of the vaccine associated with effector generation. Changes in safety pharmacology endpoints would be considered off-target and further studies are conducted only if changes in these endpoints are observed in nonclinical or clinical studies. Thus our decision tree does not recommend the routine conduct of stand-alone safety pharmacology studies.