Monoclonal antibody 8H9 I-124(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)

Radiolabeled antibody treatment with ¹³¹I-omburtamab, administered intraventricularly into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space, can deliver therapeutic absorbed doses to sites of leptomeningeal disease. Assessment of distribution and radiation dosimetry is a key element in optimizing such treatments. Using a theranostic approach, we performed pretreatment ¹³¹I-omburtamab imaging and dosimetric analysis in patients before therapy. Methods: Whole-body planar images were acquired 3 ± 1, 23 ± 2, and 47 ± 2 h after intracranioventricular administration of 75 ± 5 MBq of ¹³¹I-omburtamab via an Ommaya reservoir. Multiple blood samples were also obtained for kinetic analysis. Separate regions of interest (ROIs) were manually drawn to include the lateral ventricles, entire spinal canal CSF space, and over the whole body. Count data in the ROIs were corrected for background and physical decay, converted to activity, and subsequently fitted to an exponential clearance function. The radiation absorbed dose was estimated to the CSF, separately to the spinal column and ventricles, and to the whole body and blood. Biodistribution of the injected radiolabeled antibody was assessed for all patients. Results: Ninety-five patients were included in the analysis. Biodistribution showed prompt localization in the ventricles and spinal CSF space with low systemic distribution, noted primarily as hepatic, renal, and bladder activity after the first day. Using ROI analysis, the effective half-lives were 13 ± 11 h (range, 5-75 h) for CSF in the spinal column, 8 ± 3 h (range, 3-17 h) for ventricles, and 41 ± 11 (range, 23-81 h) for the whole body. Mean absorbed doses were 0.63 ± 0.38 cGy/MBq (range, 0.24-2.25 cGy/MBq) for CSF in the spinal column, 1.03 ± 0.69 cGy/MBq (range, 0.27-5.15 cGy/MBq) for the ventricular CSF, and 0.45 ± 0.32 mGy/MBq (range, 0.05-1.43 mGy/MBq) for the whole body. Conclusion: Pretherapeutic imaging with ¹³¹I-omburtamab allows assessment of biodistribution and dosimetry before the administration of therapeutic activity. Absorbed doses to the CSF compartments and whole body derived from the widely applicable serial ¹³¹I-omburtamab planar images had acceptable agreement with previously reported data determined from serial ¹²⁴I-omburtamab PET scans.

The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry of ¹²⁴I-omburtamab administered intraperitoneally in patients with desmoplastic small round cell tumor. Methods: Eligible patients diagnosed with desmoplastic small round cell tumor with peritoneal involvement were enrolled in a phase I trial of intraperitoneal radioimmunotherapy with ¹³¹I-omburtamab. After thyroid blockade and before radioimmunotherapy, patients received approximately 74 MBq of ¹²⁴I-omburtamab intraperitoneally. Five serial PET/CT scans were obtained up to 144 h after injection. Multiple blood samples were obtained up to 120 h after injection. Organ-absorbed doses were calculated with OLINDA/EXM. Results: Thirty-one patients were studied. Blood pharmacokinetics exhibited a biphasic pattern consisting of an initial rising phase with a median half-time (±SD) of 23 ± 15 h and a subsequent falling phase with a median half-time of 56 ± 34 h. Peritoneal distribution was heterogeneous and diffuse in most patients. Self-dose to the peritoneal cavity was 0.58 ± 0.19 mGy/MBq. Systemic distribution and activity in major organs were low. The median absorbed doses were 0.72 ± 0.23 mGy/MBq for liver, 0.48 ± 0.17 mGy/MBq for spleen, and 0.57 ± 0.12 mGy/MBq for kidneys. The mean effective dose was 0.31 ± 0.10 mSv/MBq. Whole-body and peritoneal cavity biologic half-times were 45 ± 9 and 24 ± 5 h, respectively. Conclusion: PET/CT imaging with intraperitoneally administered ¹²⁴I-omburtamab enables assessment of intraperitoneal distribution and estimation of absorbed dose to peritoneal space and normal organs before therapy.