Open-Label, Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Neoadjuvant Nogapendekin Alfa Inbakicept, Sotevtamab, and Zabadinostat in Combination With Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel for Participants With Borderline Resectable or Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

This is an open-label, phase 1 clinical trial to evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NAI, sotevtamab, and zabadinostat in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel) followed by resection and adjuvant immunotherapy for participants with borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Eligible participants will undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biopsies of the primary pancreatic tumor within 7 days of enrollment and prior to study day 1. EUS-guided biopsies will be used for histopathological examination to give clinical diagnostic information (as SoC) and will be stored in an ethically approved tissue bank.

开始日期2026-09-01

申办/合作机构

ImmunityBio, Inc.

NCT06225843

/ Recruiting临床2期

A Proof-of-Concept Phase II Trial to Evaluate the EMT Inhibitor Sotevtamab Combined With FOLFOX Administered as Neoadjuvant Treatment Prior to Resection of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis

This Phase II study will recruit 17 colorectal cancer patients with liver-dominant metastases. All recruited patients will receive Sotevtamab at a dose of 800 mg once weekly for 6 cycles combined with FOLFOX once every 2 weeks for the first 4 cycles followed by liver metastases resection surgery with or without primary cancer resection. One cycle of treatment will consist of 14 days (2 weeks).

开始日期2024-02-15

申办/合作机构

Alethia Biotherapeutics, Inc.

NCT04364620

/ Completed临床2期

A Phase II Study of AB-16B5 Combined With Docetaxel in Previously Treated Subjects With Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (EGIA-002)

This Phase II study will recruit 40 metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients who failed treatment with a platinum-containing doublet treatment and an anti-PD1 or PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibody, administered simultaneously or sequentially. All recruited patients will receive AB-16B5 at a dose of 12 mg/kg once weekly combined with docetaxel at a dose of 75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks.

开始日期2021-02-23

申办/合作机构

Alethia Biotherapeutics, Inc.

100 项与 Sotevtamab 相关的临床结果

登录后查看更多信息

100 项与 Sotevtamab 相关的转化医学

登录后查看更多信息

100 项与 Sotevtamab 相关的专利（医药）

登录后查看更多信息

项与 Sotevtamab 相关的新闻（医药）

2026-07-23

·SYNAPSE

Sotevtamab Biologics Sequence Review Report 2026: CLU Similarity and Patent-Risk Signals

This Sotevtamab Biologics Sequence Review Report was produced with PatSnap Biology Modality MCP workflows. It connects patent-scale similarity search, sequence retrieval, pairwise alignment and antibody–antigen evidence in a reproducible screen. Explore the PatSnap MCP servers used in this report. Review date: 23 July 2026. This report supports R&D and IP triage; it is not a legal opinion, freedom-to-operate conclusion or validity analysis. A sequence hit does not establish infringement. “Claimed” is a database annotation that still requires family consolidation, live-claim review and jurisdiction-specific claim construction. Executive sequence-risk thesisSotevtamab is an antibody directed to CLU. Public therapeutic sequence data from Thera-SAbDab PL132, Oxford Protein Informatics Group supplied the query material: VH 117 aa, VL 112 aa. PatSnap’s all-patent protein search returned a closest review hit at 100.00% query identity across 117/117; the returned record was marked Yes. The screening conclusion is elevated diligence priority, not “blocked” or “clear.” Similarity is most informative when interpreted by chain, CDR/framework location, construct architecture, target evidence and the language of live claims. Constant-region reuse or a common light chain can produce high percentages without proving asset-level collision, while a small number of substitutions in a CDR or linker junction can be disproportionately important. Sequence scope and MCP workflowThe review began with traceable Thera-SAbDab PL132, Oxford Protein Informatics Group query sequences. Each available VH, VL and secondary arm was submitted with ls_sequence_search_submit against ALLPATENT protein records, using gaps, E-value ≤1×10−5, identity 70–100%, query coverage 80–100% and a 500-record task cap. Results were retrieved with ls_sequence_search_get_results; the closest informative hit was resolved with ls_sequence_fetch and compared using ls_sequence_alignment. ls_patent_sequence_fetch and ls_antibody_antigen_search supplied patent and target context. Similarity search readoutQuerySearch volumeLeading evidenceVH (117 aa)500 returned records100.00% identity; 117/117; claimed: YesVL (112 aa)500 returned records100.00% identity; 112/112; claimed: NoThe largest chain-level result set contained 500 records. These are search records, not unique inventions, enforceable claims or independent families. Publications can repeat the same sequence across jurisdictions, examples, comparators and continuations. Deduplication by earliest priority, applicant, simple family and legal status is required before business conclusions. Module-level reading of the constructThe available query set contains 2 independently searchable chain module(s). For this single-pair format, heavy- and light-variable evidence should still be interpreted together. A highly conserved light chain can be shared across unrelated heavy chains, while a heavy-chain match may include common framework and constant-region sequence outside the specificity-defining CDRs. The chain totals also provide a practical specificity check. A chain that repeatedly reaches the task cap is less discriminating at the raw-sequence level than a chain with a smaller, concentrated result set. Reviewers should therefore prioritize the rarest domain or junction, then use the more widely reused chain as corroboration. This ordering reduces the risk of treating platform-level or germline similarity as evidence of an asset-level collision. Pairwise alignment: what the closest hit meansThe selected VH comparison reported 117/117 identical positions, query coverage 117/117, E-value 3.4838e-85 and 0/117 gaps. The matched subject sequence was resolved as sequence 13850216, 117 aa, annotated “Immunoglobulin, anti-(human clusterin) (human-Mus musculus clone 16B5 heavy chain V-D-J region)”. Percentage identity alone is not a claim chart. The next review should map every mismatch to IMGT/Kabat position, CDR or framework, constant region, linker boundary and any claimed SEQ ID. For multispecific assets, each arm should also be searched independently because a full-construct query can obscure highly conserved binding modules. Antibody–antigen and patent-sequence evidenceThe exact asset-name filter did not return a direct antibody–antigen relation. Because naming and alias coverage varies across patent records, the result should be supplemented with target-level and development-code searches; it must not be read as negative biological or patent evidence. No directly named patent sequence set was resolved from the first antibody–antigen record. That absence is an evidence-coverage limitation, not evidence of patent clearance; family and alias searches remain necessary. Evidence strength and blind spotsThe evidence is strongest for the exact query sequences, the returned alignment coordinates and the patent records directly resolved by the MCP tools. It is weaker where therapeutic aliases are absent, where a publication supplies fragments instead of the administered construct, or where the result set is capped before all lower-ranked families are reviewed. Antibody names can also refer to a parental molecule, biosimilar, anti-drug antibody or comparator; the underlying sequence and target annotation must be read before attributing a record to Sotevtamab. Patent sequence listings are deliberately broad and can contain screening libraries, consensus sequences, controls, antigens, primers and manufacturing elements alongside candidate therapeutics. Conversely, relevant claims may define a molecule through CDR combinations, percentage-identity thresholds, functional binding language or genus formulas without reproducing the exact commercial sequence. This is why the report combines sequence similarity with antibody–antigen evidence and still stops short of a legal conclusion. Patent-risk interpretationDimensionScreening signalRequired next checkSequence proximity100.00% closest reviewed identityConsolidate families and map mismatches by domain.Claim annotationYesRead live independent and dependent claims in relevant jurisdictions.Target evidenceNo exact-name hitSearch aliases, development codes and each target separately.Legal conclusionNot determinedAssess priority, ownership, licensing, prosecution, validity and territorial status with counsel.Diligence actionsConfirm that the reviewed sequence matches the clinical or commercial construct rather than an early lead or analytical reference.Repeat searches for CDR-only queries, junctions and nucleotide sequences, then cluster records by patent family.Annotate each high-identity hit by VH/VL domain, CDR, framework, Fc and linker position.Retrieve the underlying sequence listing and verify the returned sequence number and “claimed” annotation against the filed document.Build jurisdiction-specific claim charts for live families and document licenses or platform rights affecting CLU programs.Rerun the MCP workflow at the transaction or development decision date because sequence and legal-status coverage changes.Bottom lineSotevtamab has a traceable therapeutic sequence. The combination of 100.00% closest-hit identity, Yes claim annotation, an exact-name evidence gap and 0 directly fetched patent sequences supports elevated diligence priority. The defensible outcome is a prioritized, domain-aware family and claim review—not a binary clearance statement. Explore PatSnap Open Platform MCP Servers to produce sequence similarity and patent-risk reports for antibodies, proteins, peptides and nucleic-acid assets. Sources and methodology notesQuery sequences: Thera-SAbDab PL132, Oxford Protein Informatics Group. Core similarity, sequence, alignment, patent-sequence and antibody–antigen evidence was retrieved through PatSnap Biology Modality MCP on 23 July 2026. Database annotations and legal status can change; rerun at the decision date.

2025-03-06

·PRNewswire

TEPMETKO Continues to Strengthens its Position as a Leading METex14 Skipping NSCLC Therapy | DelveInsight

With increasing biomarker-driven cancer treatments, TEPMETKO benefits from growing adoption in precision oncology. Competition from other MET inhibitors like TABRECTA (capmatinib) exists, but TEPMETKO's once-daily dosing and efficacy profile offer differentiation. LAS VEGAS, March 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- DelveInsight's " TEPMETKO Market Size, Forecast, and Market Insight Report" highlights the details around TEPMETKO, a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. The report provides product descriptions, patent details, and competitor products (marketed and emerging therapies) of TEPMETKO. The report also highlights the historical and forecasted sales from 2020 to 2034 segmented into 7MM [the United States, the EU4 (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain), the United Kingdom, and Japan]. EMD Serono's TEPMETKO (tepotinib) Overview TEPMETKO is a kinase inhibitor prescribed for adult patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying MET exon 14 skipping alterations. The active component is Tepotinib (as hydrochloride monohydrate), administered orally. Patients should be cautioned about the heightened risk of severe or fatal interstitial lung disease/pneumonitis, liver toxicity, and potential embryo-fetal toxicity, necessitating effective contraception during and shortly after treatment. Tepotinib specifically targets MET, including variants with exon 14 skipping mutations. It blocks HGF-dependent and independent MET phosphorylation, disrupting MET-driven signaling pathways. Additionally, at clinically relevant concentrations, Tepotinib inhibits melatonin 2 and imidazoline 1 receptors. In vitro studies show that it suppresses tumor cell proliferation, anchorage-independent growth, and migration of MET-dependent cancer cells. In mouse models with MET-driven tumors, including those with MET exon 14 skipping alterations, Tepotinib reduced tumor growth, sustained MET phosphorylation inhibition, and, in one case, decreased metastasis formation. The recommended dose of TEPMETKO is 450 mg taken orally once daily until disease progression or intolerable toxicity occurs. Patients should take it at the same time each day, swallowing tablets whole without chewing, crushing, or splitting them. If a dose is missed and less than eight hours remain until the next scheduled dose, patients should skip it. In cases of vomiting after taking TEPMETKO, the next dose should be taken at the usual time. Learn more about TEPMETKO projected market size for NSCLC @ TEPMETKO Market Potential Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, accounting for 81% of all diagnosed cases. Early detection greatly improves outcomes, but diagnosing NSCLC and other lung cancers is challenging because their symptoms are often mistaken for common illnesses or the long-term effects of smoking. Consequently, 80% of NSCLC cases are already at advanced stages by the time they are identified, making treatment more difficult. Around 80% of EGFR mutations in NSCLC involve either exon 19 deletions or the exon 21 L858R substitution, both of which are classified as sensitizing mutations. Until the last decade, chemotherapy was the primary treatment for advanced and metastatic lung cancer. However, this changed in 2015 with the approval of the first immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), KEYTRUDA (pembrolizumab), as a second-line therapy for advanced cases. This was followed by TECENTRIQ (atezolizumab) in 2016. Both therapies were later approved for first-line treatment, broadening their use to a larger patient population. In 2020, the combination of OPDIVO (nivolumab) and ipilimumab also received approval as a first-line treatment for metastatic NSCLC. According to DelveInsight, the NSCLC market size across the 7MM is projected to grow from USD 30 billion in 2024, with a substantial CAGR through 2034. This growth is largely driven by the introduction of emerging therapies during the forecast period (2025–2034). Discover more about the NSCLC market in detail @ Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Market Report Emerging Competitors of TEPMETKO The NSCLC pipeline is very robust with the promising therapies such as Telisotuzumab vedotin (AbbVie), Patritumab deruxtecan (Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca), Datopotamab deruxtecan (Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca), Eftilagimod alpha (Immutep), BNT311/GEN1046 (acasunlimab) (Genmab), V940 (mRNA-4157) + Pembrolizumab (Moderna Therapeutics/Merck), Plinabulin + Docetaxel (BeyondSpring), Olomorasib (LY3537982) (Eli Lilly and Company), Zipalertinib (Cullinan Oncology/Taiho Pharma), Ceralasertib (AZD6738) (AstraZeneca), TEDOPI (EP-2101; IDM 2101; OSE-2101) (OSE Immuno-therapeutics), Sigvotatug vedotin (PF08046047) (Pfizer), ANKTIVA (N-803) (ImmunityBio), Aumolertinib/Almonertinib/HS-10206 (Jiangsu Hansoh Pharmaceutical), Niraparib (GSK), Savolitinib (AstraZeneca/Hutchison MediPharma), TRODELVY (Gilead Sciences), Pyrotinib (Jiangsu HengRui Medicine), Ociperlimab (BGB-A1217) (BieGene), Volrustomig (AstraZeneca), Gotistobart (BNT316/ONC-392) (OncoC4/BioNTech), Ivonescimab (AK112/SMT112) (Akeso Biopharma/Summit Therapeutics), ZYNYZ (retifanlimab/INCMGA00012) (Incyte/Macrogenics), Divarasib (GDC-6036) (Roche/Genentech), Tiragolumab (RG6058) (Roche), Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Merck and Kelun-Biotech), JEMPERLI (dostarlimab/TSR-042) (GSK and AnaptysBio), Zongertinib (BI-1810631) (Boehringer Ingelheim), BAY 2927088 (Bayer), Serplulimab (HLX10) (Shanghai Henlius Biotech), Rilvegostomig (AZD2936) (AstraZeneca), MK-1084 (Merck, Taiho Pharmaceutical, and Astex), Domvanalimab (Arcus Biosciences and Gilead Sciences), OPDUALAG (nivolumab and relatlimab) (Bristol-Myers Squibb), Belrestotug + JEMPERLI (iTeos Therapeutics and GSK), Firmonertinib (ArriVent BioPharma), Sunvozertinib (DZD9008) (Dizal Pharmaceutical), Cobolimab (GSK), Livmoniplimab (AbbVie), Fianlimab (REGN3767) (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals), BNT327/PM8002 (Biotheus/BioNTech), HS-20117 (Hansoh BioMedical), IO102-IO103 + Pembrolizumab (IO Biotech), Naptumomab estafenatox (NeoTX Therapeutics/Active Biotech), FF-10832 (FUJIFILM Corporation), BNT116 (BioNTechSE/Regeneron Pharmaceuticals), CAN-2409 (Candel Therapeutics), Mecbotamab Vedotin (BA3011/CAB-AXL-ADC) (BioAtla), Bemcentinib (BGB 324/BGB-3234/R-428) (BerGenBio/Rigel Pharmaceuticals), DOVBLERON (taletrectinib/AB-106/IBI-344) (Nuvation Bio/Innovent Biologics/Daiichi Sankyo/Nippon Kayaku), Lifileucel (Iovance Biotherapeutics), IBI363 (Innovent Biologics), Sotevtamab (AB-16B5) (Alethia Biotherapeutics), Avutometinib (VS6766) (Verastem Oncology), Vebreltinib (APL-101) (Apollomics), LP-300 (Lantern Pharma), JNJ-90301900 (Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine), AMG 193 (Amgen), Luveltamab tazevibulin (Sutro Biopharma), PRT3789 (Prelude Therapeutics), Disitamab vedotin (Seagen), PADCEV (enfortumab vedotin) (Astellas Pharma), RP1 (Replimune), TIVDAK (tisotumab vedotin) (Seagen), Zanidatamab (Jazz Pharmaceuticals), Utidelone injectable (UTD1) (Beijing Biostar Pharmaceuticals), REGN5093-M114 (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals), SLC-391 (SignalChem Lifesciences), fulzerasib (GenFleet), Davutamig (REGN5093) (Regeneron Pharmaceuticals), TAS3351 (Taiho Oncology), H002 (RedCloud Bio), JIN-A02 (J INTS BIO), FWD1509 (Forward Pharma), Sabestomig (AZD7789) (AstraZeneca), Sasanlimab (Pfizer), Selvigaltin (GB1211) (Galecto Biotech), Vepafestinib Helsinn (Healthcare/Taiho Pharmaceutical), EP0031 (A400/ KL590586) (Ellipses Pharma/Kelun-Biotech), Pamvatamig (MCLA-129) (Merus), Zidesamtinib (NVL-520) (Nuvalent), NVL-655 (Nuvalent), RMC-4630 (Revolution Medicines), REQORSA (quaratusugene ozeplasmid) (Genprex), PDC*lung01 (PDC*line Pharma), Evalstotug (BA3071) (BioAtla and BeiGene), PT-112 (Promontory Therapeutics), MRT-2359 (Monte Rosa Therapeutics), GAIA-102 (GAIA BioMedicine), Rigosertib (Traws Pharma), HMBD-001 (Hummingbird Bioscience), PLB1004 (Avistone Biotechnology), ANS03 (Avistone Biotechnology), MYTX-011 (Mythic Therapeutics), A166 (Sichuan Kelun-Biotech Bio-pharmaceutical), Atamparib (BN-2397) (Ribon Therapeutics), DELTACEL (KB-GDT-01) (Kiromic BioPharma), Carotuximab (ENV-105) (Kairos Pharma), YL202 (MediLink Therapeutics), and others. To know more about the number of competing drugs in development, visit @ TEPMETKO Market Positioning Compared to Other Drugs Key Milestones of TEPMETKO In February 2024, the FDA granted traditional approval to TEPMETKO for adult patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. In February 2022, the EC approved TEPMETKO as monotherapy for the treatment of adult patients with advanced NSCLC harboring alterations leading to METex14 skipping who require systemic therapy following prior treatment with immunotherapy and/or platinum-based chemotherapy. In February 2021, Merck announced that the US FDA has approved TEPMETKO following priority review for the treatment of adult patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring MET exon 14 skipping alterations. This indication was approved under accelerated approval based on ORR and DOR. In October 2020, TEPMETKO received ODD for treating NSCLC with MET genomic tumor aberrations In March 2020, EMD Serono (the biopharmaceutical business of Merck KGaA), announced that the MHLW approved TEPMETKO for the treatment of patients with unresectable, advanced, or recurrent NSCLC with METex14 skipping alterations. In September 2019, the US FDA granted BTD for tepotinib in patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring METex14 skipping alterations who progressed following platinum-based cancer therapy Discover how TEPMETKO is shaping the NSCLC treatment landscape @ TEPMETKO NSCLC TEPMETKO Market Dynamics TEPMETKO competes in a growing but highly specialized market where MET-targeted therapies are gaining traction due to their efficacy in addressing MET-altered tumors. The market for MET inhibitors is expanding as precision oncology advances and molecular diagnostics become more widely available, enabling better identification of patients who would benefit from targeted treatments like TEPMETKO. A key factor shaping TEPMETKO's market dynamics is competition. It directly competes with Novartis' TABRECTA (capmatinib), another MET inhibitor approved for the same indication. While TEPMETKO offers the advantage of once-daily dosing compared to TABRECTA's twice-daily regimen, both drugs have similar efficacy profiles, making physician and patient preference an important differentiator. Additionally, broader competition from next-generation MET inhibitors and combination therapies in clinical trials could impact TEPMETKO's long-term market position. Regulatory approvals and market access play a crucial role in TEPMETKO's adoption. The drug has been approved in multiple regions, including the U.S., Europe, and Japan, but reimbursement and pricing strategies vary by market. Payer policies, along with the cost-benefit analysis of MET inhibitors compared to other targeted therapies, influence prescription trends. Furthermore, real-world evidence and post-marketing studies will be critical in demonstrating TEPMETKO's sustained effectiveness and safety, which could support expanded indications and increased market penetration. Looking ahead, the MET inhibitor market is expected to grow with advances in biomarker-driven therapy, further refining patient selection. TEPMETKO's success will depend on continued clinical development, potential label expansions, and strategic partnerships to strengthen its competitive edge. As new entrants emerge, Merck KGaA's ability to differentiate TEPMETKO through combination strategies or enhanced formulations may determine its long-term sustainability in this evolving landscape. Dive deeper to get more insight into TEPMETKO's strengths & weaknesses relative to competitors @ TEPMETKO Market Drug Report Table of Contents Related Reports Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Market Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Market Insights, Epidemiology, and Market Forecast – 2034 report deliver an in-depth understanding of the disease, historical and forecasted epidemiology, as well as the market trends, market drivers, market barriers, and key NSCLC companies including Daiichi Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, BieGene, AbbVie, Roche, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly, BerGenBio, GlaxoSmithKline, Duality biologics, among others. Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Pipeline Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Pipeline Insight – 2025 report provides comprehensive insights about the pipeline landscape, pipeline drug profiles, including clinical and non-clinical stage products, and the key non-small cell lung cancer companies, including BridgeBio Pharma, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, Merck, BridgeBio Pharma, Abbvie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly and Company BioNTech SE, Shenzhen TargetRx, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chong Kun Dang, Bristol Myers Squibb, Innovent Biologics, Xuanzhu Biopharmaceutical, Bayer, GeneScience Pharmaceuticals, InventisBio, Apollomics, Imugene, Ono Pharmaceutical, Pierre Fabre, Jiangsu Hengrui Medicine Co., Bristol-Myers Squibb, Surface Oncology, Inhibrx, Sinocelltech, Mirati Therapeutics, REVOLUTION Medicines, Yong Shun Technology Development, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Galecto Biotech, among others. C-MET Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Market C-MET Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Market Insights, Epidemiology, and Market Forecast – 2034 report deliver an in-depth understanding of the disease, historical and forecasted epidemiology, as well as the market trends, market drivers, market barriers, and key C-MET mNSCLC companies, including Novartis, Merck, EMD Serono, AbbVie, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Mythic Therapeutics, Apollomics, Johnson & Johnson Innovation, Haihe Biopharma, among others. C-MET Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Pipeline C-MET Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Pipeline Insight – 2025 report provides comprehensive insights about the pipeline landscape, pipeline drug profiles, including clinical and non-clinical stage products, and the key C-MET non-small cell lung cancer companies, including AbbVie, Janssen Research & Development, Beijing Pearl Biotechnology Limited Liability Company, Novartis, among others. About DelveInsight DelveInsight is a leading Business Consultant and Market Research firm focused exclusively on life sciences. It supports pharma companies by providing comprehensive end-to-end solutions to improve their performance. Get hassle-free access to all the healthcare and pharma market research reports through our subscription-based platform PharmDelve . Contact Us Shruti Thakur [email protected] +14699457679 Logo: SOURCE DelveInsight Business Research, LLP WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM? 440k+ Newsrooms & Influencers 9k+ Digital Media Outlets 270k+ Journalists Opted In GET STARTED

上市批准免疫疗法优先审批

100 项与 Sotevtamab 相关的药物交易

登录后查看更多信息

研发状态

10 条进展最快的记录,

后查看更多信息

适应症	最高研发状态	国家/地区	公司	日期
结肠癌肝转移	临床2期	加拿大	Alethia Biotherapeutics, Inc.	2024-02-15
转移性结直肠癌	临床2期	加拿大	Alethia Biotherapeutics, Inc.	2024-02-15
转移性非小细胞肺癌	临床2期	美国	Alethia Biotherapeutics, Inc.	2021-02-23
转移性非小细胞肺癌	临床2期	加拿大	Alethia Biotherapeutics, Inc.	2021-02-23
晚期恶性实体瘤	临床1期	加拿大	Alethia Biotherapeutics, Inc.	2015-04-01
肿瘤	药物发现	俄罗斯	International Biotech Center Generium	2013-05-29

登录后查看更多信息

临床结果

适应症

分期

评价

查看全部结果

研究	分期	人群特征	评价人数	分组	结果	评价	发布日期


NCT04364620 (Phase II trial, CTgov)	临床2期	转移性非小细胞肺癌	35	Docetaxel+AB-16B5	獵餘構窪製襯衊壓鹽製 = 餘壓襯構淵積選築淵艱繭鏇餘積衊衊蓋糧衊構 (選積願製艱鹽齋齋鏇積, 壓齋遞衊選鹹鏇餘壓願 ~ 鹽憲淵襯鏇鹹選窪構蓋) 更多	-	2025-04-06
NCT04364620 (ASCO2024) 人工标引	临床2期	转移性非小细胞肺癌	35	Sotevtamab 12 mg/kg + Docetaxel 75 mg/m2	積願齋夢憲顧餘顧醖鹽(鹹鹹襯鬱糧積窪簾壓膚) = 憲積積構製製遞壓構築糧窪鹽遞糧蓋廠選襯鬱 (遞築構夢築簾簾鏇鑰獵 ) 更多	积极	2024-05-24
NCT02412462 (AACR 12017 \| AACR 22017) 人工标引	临床1期	晚期恶性实体瘤	15	Sotevtamab	鹹糧窪餘艱鬱繭範窪選(觸齋製顧蓋願鏇壓廠鹹) = 5 were reported (sepsis, pyrexia, dyspnea, intra-abdominal hemorrhage and main stem bronchus obstruction), none of which were judged related to the study treatment 餘糧遞窪顧憲鏇夢選糧 (築壓範窪夢築積網糧襯 ) 更多	积极	2017-07-01