Dezamizumab

In a Phase I study treatment with the serum amyloid P component (SAP) depleter miridesap followed by monoclonal antibody to SAP (dezamizumab) showed removal of amyloid from liver, spleen and kidney in patients with systemic amyloidosis. We report results from a Phase 2 study and concurrent immuno-positron emission tomography (PET) study assessing efficacy, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, safety and cardiac uptake (of dezamizumab) following the same intervention in patients with cardiac amyloidosis.

Both were uncontrolled open-label studies. After SAP depletion with miridesap, patients received ≤ 6 monthly doses of dezamizumab in the Phase 2 trial (n = 7), ≤ 2 doses of non-radiolabelled dezamizumab plus [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab (total mass dose of 80 mg at session 1 and 500 mg at session 2) in the immuno-PET study (n = 2). Primary endpoints of the Phase 2 study were changed from baseline to follow-up (at 8 weeks) in left ventricular mass (LVM) by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and safety. Primary endpoint of the immuno-PET study was [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab cardiac uptake assessed via PET.

Dezamizumab produced no appreciable or consistent reduction in LVM nor improvement in cardiac function in the Phase 2 study. In the immuno-PET study, measurable cardiac uptake of [89Zr]Zr-dezamizumab, although seen in both patients, was moderate to low. Uptake was notably lower in the patient with higher LVM. Treatment-associated rash with cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis was observed in both studies. Abdominal large-vessel vasculitis after initial dezamizumab dosing (300 mg) occurred in the first patient with immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis enrolled in the Phase 2 study. Symptom resolution was nearly complete within 24 h of intravenous methylprednisolone and dezamizumab discontinuation; abdominal computed tomography imaging showed vasculitis resolution by 8 weeks.

Unlike previous observations of visceral amyloid reduction, there was no appreciable evidence of amyloid removal in patients with cardiac amyloidosis in this Phase 2 trial, potentially related to limited cardiac uptake of dezamizumab as demonstrated in the immuno-PET study. The benefit-risk assessment for dezamizumab in cardiac amyloidosis was considered unfavourable after the incidence of large-vessel vasculitis and development for this indication was terminated.Trial registration NCT03044353 (2 February 2017) and NCT03417830 (25 January 2018).

Lack of simple and robust methods to determine complement activation in human serum induced by antigen-antibody complexes is a major hurdle for monitoring therapeutic antibody drug quality and stability. Dezamizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that binds to serum amyloid P component (SAP) for potential treatment of systemic amyloidosis. The mechanism of action of Dezamizumab includes the binding of SAP, complement activation through classical pathway, and phagocytosis; however, the steps in this process cannot be easily monitored. We developed two novel methods to determine Dezamizumab-SAP complex-induced complement activation. Complement component 3 (C3) depletion was detected by homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF), and C3a desArg fragment, formed after the cleavage of C3 to yield C3a followed by removal of its C-terminal arginine residue, was determined using Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) technology. We found that the presence of both Dezamizumab and SAP was required for complement activation via both methods. The optimal molar ratio of Dezamizumab:SAP was 6:1 in order to obtain maximal complement activation. The relative potency from both methods showed a good correlation to Dezamizumab-SAP-dependent complement component 1q (C1q) binding activity in Dezamizumab thermal-stressed samples. Both SAP and C1q binding, as determined by surface plasmon resonance and the two complement activation potency methods described here, reflect the mechanism of action of Dezamizumab. We conclude that these methods can be used to monitor Dezamizumab quality for drug release and stability testing, and the novel potency methods reported here can be potentially used to evaluate complement activity induced by other antigen-antibody complexes.