Article
作者: Sturmoski, Mark A ; Fleming, Timothy P ; Mardis, Elaine R ; Gao, Feng ; Mardis, Elaine R. ; Gillanders, William E ; Goedegebuure, S Peter ; Hansen, Ted H ; Foluso, Ademuyiwa ; Hundal, Jasreet ; Kim, Samuel W. ; Chen, Michael Y ; Griffith, Malachi ; Chen, Michael Y. ; Miller, Christopher A ; Ma, Cynthia X ; Zhang, Felicia ; Hagemann, Ian S. ; Griffith, Obi ; Myers, Nancy B. ; Miller, Christopher A. ; Sankpal, Narendra V ; Singhal, Kartik ; Zhang, Xiuli ; Fleming, Timothy P. ; Schreiber, Robert D ; Schreiber, Robert D. ; Vickery, Tammi ; Li, Lijin ; Yu, Yik Yeung ; Hagemann, Ian S ; Chen, Ina ; Hansen, Ted H. ; Gillanders, William E. ; Ma, Cynthia X. ; Suresh, Rama ; McLellan, Michael D. ; Davidson, Jesse T. ; McLellan, Michael D ; Davies, Sherri ; Davidson, Jesse T ; Goedegebuure, S. Peter ; Sankpal, Narendra V. ; Kim, Samuel W ; Mishra, Rashmi ; Sturmoski, Mark A. ; Wang-Gillam, Andrea ; Myers, Nancy B ; Myles, Stephanie
AbstractBackgroundNeoantigen vaccines can induce or enhance highly specific antitumor immune responses with minimal risk of autoimmunity. We have developed a neoantigen DNA vaccine platform capable of efficiently presenting both HLA class I and II epitopes and performed a phase 1 clinical trial in triple-negative breast cancer patients with persistent disease on surgical pathology following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a patient population at high risk of disease recurrence.MethodsExpressed somatic mutations were identified by tumor/normal exome sequencing and tumor RNA sequencing. The pVACtools software suite of neoantigen prediction algorithms was used to identify and prioritize cancer neoantigens and facilitate vaccine design for manufacture in an academic GMP facility. Neoantigen DNA vaccines were administered via electroporation in the adjuvant setting (i.e., following surgical removal of the primary tumor and completion of standard of care therapy). Vaccines were monitored for safety and immune responses via ELISpot, intracellular cytokine production via flow cytometry, and TCR sequencing.ResultsEighteen subjects received three doses of a neoantigen DNA vaccine encoding on average 11 neoantigens per patient (range 4–20). The vaccinations were well tolerated with relatively few adverse events. Neoantigen-specific T cell responses were induced in 14/18 patients as measured by ELISpot and flow cytometry. At a median follow-up of 36 months, recurrence-free survival was 87.5% (95% CI: 72.7–100%) in the cohort of vaccinated patients.ConclusionOur study demonstrates neoantigen DNA vaccines are safe, feasible, and capable of inducing neoantigen-specific immune responses.Clinical trial registration numberNCT02348320.