更新于：2024-07-15
Lesogaberan
更新于：2024-07-15
概要
基本信息
原研机构 |
在研机构- |
最高研发阶段无进展临床2期 |
首次获批日期- |
最高研发阶段(中国)- |
特殊审评- |
结构
分子式C3H9FNO2P |
InChIKeyLJNUIEQATDYXJH-GSVOUGTGSA-N |
CAS号344413-67-8 |
关联
15
项与 Lesogaberan 相关的临床试验The Role of GABAb receptor mechanisms in cough: Double-blind randomised controlled trial of Lesogaberan in Chronic cough patients with positive and negative symptom association probabilities - GARMIN-II: double-blind randomised controlled trial of lesogaberan in cough
Efficacy and Safety of Lesogaberan (AZD3355) in Chinese Patients With Reflux Symptoms Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy: a Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial
The Role of GABAB Receptor Mechanisms in Cough: Effect of Lesogaberan, Baclofen and Placebo on Experimentally Induced Cough Responses in Healthy Controls
100 项与 Lesogaberan 相关的临床结果
登录后查看更多信息
100 项与 Lesogaberan 相关的转化医学
登录后查看更多信息
100 项与 Lesogaberan 相关的专利（医药）
登录后查看更多信息
35
项与 Lesogaberan 相关的文献（医药）2023-08-01EClinicalMedicine
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy for refractory or unexplained chronic cough: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
Article
作者: Chen, Ruchong ; Morice, Alyn ; Wu, Tong ; Xie, Shuojia ; Tang, Kailun ; Lan, Xiaoqing ; Li, Shiyue ; Huang, Junfeng ; Song, Woo-Jung ; Xiang, Ziyuan ; Lin, Zikai ; Zheng, Ziwen
Background:
Refractory chronic cough (RCC) has a significant impact on patient's health-related quality of life and represents a challenge in clinical management. However, the optimal treatment for RCC remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate and compare the efficacy and safety of the current pharmacological therapeutic options for RCC.
Methods:
A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Ovid databases from January 1, 2008 to March 1, 2023. All randomised control trials (RCTs) reporting outcomes of efficacy or/and safety were included in the Bayesian network meta-analysis. Here, we compared the effects on Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and objective cough frequency of patients with RCC. Besides, we also compared the incidence of adverse events (AEs) for analysis of safety. PROSPERO registration: CRD42022345940.
Findings:
19 eligible RCTs included 3326 patients and 7 medication categories: P2X3 antagonist, GABA modulator, Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) modulator, NK-1 agonist, opioid analgesic, macrolide, and sodium cromoglicate. Compared with placebo, mean difference (MD) of LCQ and 24 h cough frequency for P2X3 antagonist relief were 1.637 (95% CI: 0.887-2.387) and -11.042 (P = 0.035). Compared with placebo, effect sizes (MD for LCQ and cough severity VAS) for GABA modulator were 1.347 (P = 0.003) and -7.843 (P = 0.003). In the network meta-analysis, gefapixant is the most effective treatment for patients with RCC (The Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking Curves (SUCRA) is 0.711 in LCQ, 0.983 in 24 h cough frequency, and 0.786 in cough severity VAS). Lesogaberan had better efficacy than placebo (SUCRA: 0.632 vs. 0.472) in 24 h cough frequency. Eliapixant and lesogaberan had better efficacy than placebo in cough severity VAS. However, TRP modulator had worse efficacy than placebo. In the meta-analysis of AEs, the present study found P2X3 antagonist had a significant correlation to AEs (RR: 1.129, 95% CI: 1.012-1.259), especially taste-related AEs (RR: 6.216, P < 0.05).
Interpretation:
In this network meta-analysis, P2X3 antagonist showing advantages in terms of efficacy is currently the most promising medication for treatment of RCC. GABA modulator also showed potential efficacy for RCC but with AEs of the central system. Nevertheless, the role of TRP modulator needed to be revisited. Further research is needed to determine the potential beneficiary population for optimizing the pharmacological management of chronic cough.
Funding:
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81870079), Guangdong Science and Technology Project (2021A050520012), Incubation Program of National Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (GMU2020-207).
2022-01-01ERJ open research
A double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial investigating the effects of lesogaberan on the objective cough frequency and capsaicin-evoked coughs in patients with refractory chronic cough
Article
作者: Smith, Jacky A ; Badri, Huda ; Escott, K Jane ; Wilkinson, Greame ; Whorwell, Peter ; Gibbard, Carmen ; Al-Sheklly, Bashar ; Holt, Alison ; Satia, Imran ; Treadway, Sam ; Dockry, Rachel J ; Canning, Brendan J ; McGuiness, Kevin ; Holt, Kimberley ; Lee, Augustine ; Denton, Dimitra ; Lee, Theresa ; Houghton, Lesley
Objective:
Baclofen is a centrally acting γ-aminobutyric acid type B (GABAB) receptor agonist which reduces gastro-oesophageal reflux and suppresses the cough reflex; however, central nervous system side-effects limit its use. Lesogaberan is a novel peripherally acting GABAB agonist, but its effects on refractory chronic cough are unknown.
Design:
We performed a single-centre, placebo-controlled, double-blind randomised crossover study in patients with chronic cough, refractory to the treatment of underlying conditions. Patients were randomised to treatment with lesogaberan 120 mg modified release twice daily or matched placebo for 2 weeks and then crossed over to the alternative therapy after a 2-week washout. The primary end-point was 24-h cough frequency measured with an acoustic monitoring system. In addition, cough responses to capsaicin were measured, and gastro-oesophageal reflux assessed by 24-h pH/impedance at screening.
Results:
22 patients were randomised to receive lesogaberan/placebo or placebo/lesogaberan (female (73%); mean±sd age 63.7±7.2 years; median (interquartile range) cough duration 10.5 (5.8–17.0) years; mean (95% CI) 45 (29–67) reflux events in 24 h; two patients had abnormal oesophageal acid exposure times). Although lesogaberan reduced cough counts by 26% over placebo, this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.12). However, lesogaberan did significantly improve cough responses to capsaicin (p=0.04) and the number of cough bouts (p=0.04) compared with placebo. Lesogaberan was well tolerated in this study.
Conclusions:
Lesogaberan improved cough hypersensitivity and the number of bouts of coughing, but not coughs per hour. This implies a possible role for peripheral GABAB receptors in refractory chronic cough.
2021-12-01Pulmonary pharmacology & therapeutics3区 · 医学
Effect of centrally and peripherally acting GABAB agonism on the healthy human cough reflex
3区 · 医学
Article
作者: Kimberley Holt ; Jane Escott ; Huda Badri ; Alison Holt ; Brendan J. Canning ; Jacky A. Smith ; Carmen LGibbard ; Imran Satia ; Dimitra Denton ; Rachel J. Dockry ; Greame Wilkinson
BACKGROUND:
Currently there are no effective licensed anti-tussive therapies. Understanding how the neuronal mechanisms mediating the cough reflex in animal models translate to humans is important for the development of effective therapies. Pre-clinical studies suggest that the activation of GABAB receptors in both the peripheral and central nervous systems inhibit cough.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the effect of central and peripherally acting GABAB agonists (lesogaberan and baclofen) on the cough reflex in healthy volunteers.
METHODS:
We performed a single center, double-blind, double-dummy, three-way crossover trial in healthy controls comparing single doses of lesogaberan (120 mg MR), with baclofen (40 mg) and placebos. Cough responses to inhaled capsaicin were assessed at screening and 2h post-dose on each study day. The primary endpoint was the maximum number of coughs evoked at any concentration of capsaicin (Emax) and the secondary endpoint was the concentration evoking 50% of the maximal response (ED50).
RESULTS:
Fifteen participants enrolled onto the study (median age 29 (IQR 25-44) years; 7 females, mean BMI 24.6(±3.0). Lesogaberan treatment produced a small, statistically significant increase in Emax compared with placebo [mean 13.4coughs (95%CI 10.1-17.9) vs. 11.8coughs (8.8-15.9), p = 0.04], but had no effect on ED50 [geometric mean 47.4 μM (95%CI 24.4-91.7) vs 37.6 μM (95%CI 19.2-73.5), p = 0.37]. In contrast, baclofen had no significant effect on Emax (11.1, 95%CI 8.1-15.4) (p = 0.23), but significantly increased ED50 compared with placebo (geometric mean 75.2 μM (95%CI 37.2-151.8), p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION:
This data suggests the anti-tussive actions of GABAB agonists, in healthy volunteers, occur in the central rather than the peripheral nervous system.
100 项与 Lesogaberan 相关的药物交易
登录后查看更多信息
外链
| KEGG | Wiki | ATC | Drug Bank |
|---|---|---|---|
| - | Lesogaberan | - |
研发状态
10 条进展最快的记录, 后查看更多信息
登录
| 适应症 | 最高研发状态 | 国家/地区 | 公司 | 日期 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 难治性慢性咳嗽 | 临床2期 | 英国 | 2015-04-16 | |
| 胃灼热 | 临床2期 | 美国 | 2009-10-01 | |
| 胃食管反流 | 临床2期 | 澳大利亚 | 2006-11-01 | |
| 胃食管反流 | 临床2期 | 比利时 | 2006-11-01 | |
| 胃食管反流 | 临床2期 | 法国 | 2006-11-01 | |
| 胃食管反流 | 临床2期 | 德国 | 2006-11-01 | |
| 胃食管反流 | 临床2期 | 匈牙利 | 2006-11-01 | |
| 胃食管反流 | 临床2期 | 荷兰 | 2006-11-01 | |
| 胃食管反流 | 临床2期 | 挪威 | 2006-11-01 | |
| 胃食管反流 | 临床2期 | 罗马尼亚 | 2006-11-01 |
登录后查看更多信息
临床结果
临床结果
适应症
分期
评价
查看全部结果
临床2期 | 661 | 構憲鹹淵繭醖廠糧積餘(壓艱遞獵醖壓顧鑰獵獵) = 願鹽衊窪鏇觸構範淵醖 壓遞鏇窪夢襯鹽築夢顧 (積廠鏇獵鬱觸齋糧鏇繭 ) | 不佳 | 2013-09-01 | |||
構憲鹹淵繭醖廠糧積餘(壓艱遞獵醖壓顧鑰獵獵) = 鏇簾願築夢窪簾鹽顧蓋 壓遞鏇窪夢襯鹽築夢顧 (積廠鏇獵鬱觸齋糧鏇繭 ) | |||||||
临床2期 | 478 | 淵製廠齋鏇構範窪鏇鏇(衊鏇糧齋鹽簾築醖鹹積) = 窪鑰蓋艱糧襯淵鹹鑰製 觸膚鹹選願憲獵壓窪選 (窪獵繭網襯網膚遞廠範, 齋餘艱廠鬱艱積淵顧蓋 ~ 餘製鹽網觸網窪繭鹽鹹) 更多 | - | 2011-06-20 | |||
Placebo+Gelusil® (Placebo) | 淵製廠齋鏇構範窪鏇鏇(衊鏇糧齋鹽簾築醖鹹積) = 膚製遞艱蓋艱襯夢膚網 觸膚鹹選願憲獵壓窪選 (窪獵繭網襯網膚遞廠範, 醖簾獵積簾鑰齋齋鑰淵 ~ 願願築選遞窪壓膚積鏇) 更多 | ||||||
临床2期 | 27 | (AZD3355 30 mg) | 鬱醖築餘獵廠構鹽鑰膚(壓蓋廠網鑰鬱膚鏇構餘) = 網醖願蓋選願齋糧鏇鬱 廠鹽醖夢網範願齋襯選 (繭觸膚鏇淵築鑰簾壓築, 鹹膚糧選鏇襯鬱壓網選 ~ 積窪齋襯襯鑰壓觸選願) 更多 | - | 2011-06-14 | ||
(AZD3355 90 mg) | 鬱醖築餘獵廠構鹽鑰膚(壓蓋廠網鑰鬱膚鏇構餘) = 顧鏇鏇構蓋選夢願夢網 廠鹽醖夢網範願齋襯選 (繭觸膚鏇淵築鑰簾壓築, 壓鑰糧願選選壓積淵簾 ~ 壓蓋蓋鹽憲鹽製顧廠鬱) 更多 | ||||||
临床2期 | 27 | (AZD3355) | 積網憲襯艱蓋遞繭選積(範鑰壓膚選夢繭遞夢構) = 觸襯繭襯壓網鏇繭餘簾 艱蓋衊鬱範憲獵遞窪鬱 (選簾夢鹹壓廠築窪蓋觸, 淵襯鬱艱構艱積齋蓋鏇 ~ 鬱鏇淵憲積廠獵願壓網) 更多 | - | 2011-06-10 | ||
placebo (Placebo) | 積網憲襯艱蓋遞繭選積(範鑰壓膚選夢繭遞夢構) = 範鬱鹹廠淵鏇顧製蓋築 艱蓋衊鬱範憲獵遞窪鬱 (選簾夢鹹壓廠築窪蓋觸, 製觸鏇鹽餘壓鬱蓋鏇願 ~ 餘鏇膚餘憲淵簾遞鏇願) 更多 | ||||||
临床2期 | 661 | Placebo | 憲築積獵壓顧鏇餘膚衊(製簾艱憲網觸壓構衊製) = 遞餘範鏇網憲壓醖衊憲 憲壓鬱鹽積膚繭願夢築 (範獵壓襯鏇遞襯鬱觸鏇, 鏇獵艱夢襯鹹選蓋蓋簾 ~ 鹽製選獵築築遞齋壓構) 更多 | - | 2011-04-25 |
登录后查看更多信息
转化医学
使用我们的转化医学数据加速您的研究。
登录
或
药物交易
使用我们的药物交易数据加速您的研究。
登录
或
核心专利
使用我们的核心专利数据促进您的研究。
登录
或
临床分析
紧跟全球注册中心的最新临床试验。
登录
或
批准
利用最新的监管批准信息加速您的研究。
登录
或
特殊审评
只需点击几下即可了解关键药物信息。
登录
或
来和芽仔聊天吧
立即开始免费试用!
智慧芽新药情报库是智慧芽专为生命科学人士构建的基于AI的创新药情报平台，助您全方位提升您的研发与决策效率。
立即开始数据试用!
智慧芽新药库数据也通过智慧芽数据服务平台，以API或者数据包形式对外开放，助您更加充分利用智慧芽新药情报信息。
生物序列数据库
生物药研发创新
免费使用
化学结构数据库
小分子化药研发创新
免费使用