Jeonbuk National University Hospital

Recently, the International Consensus Classification (ICC) and the 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification (WHO2022) introduced diagnostically similar yet distinct approaches, which has resulted in practical confusion. This review compares these classification systems for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), building up on the revised 4th edition of WHO (WHO2016). Both classifications retain recurrent genetic abnormalities as a primary consideration. However, they differ in terms of blast threshold. The ICC mandates a minimum of 10% blasts in the bone marrow or peripheral blood, whereas the WHO2022 does not specify a blast cut-off. AML with BCR::ABL1 requires > 20% blast count in both classifications. In WHO2022, AML with CEBPA mutation requires > 20% blasts. TP53 mutation, a new entity is exclusive to ICC, diagnosed with > 20% blasts and variant allele frequency > 10%. AML with myelodysplasia-related changes is defined by cytogenetic or gene mutation-based criteria, not morphological dysplasia. Eight genes were common to both groups: ASXL1, BCOR, EZH2, SF3B1, SRSF2, STAG2, U2AF1, and ZRSR2. An additional gene, RUNX1, was included in the ICC classification. AML cases defined by differentiation (WHO2022) and AML not otherwise specified (ICC) are categorized as lacking specific defining genetic abnormalities, WHO2022 labels this as a myeloid neoplasm post cytotoxic therapy (MN-pCT), described as an appendix after specific diagnosis. Similarly, in ICC, it can be described as “therapy-related”, without a separate AML category.

Resistant hypertension is a condition where blood pressure levels remain elevated above target despite changes in lifestyle and concurrent use of at least three antihypertensive agents, including a long-acting calcium channel blocker (CCB), a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system (ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker) and a diuretic. To be diagnosed as resistant hypertension, maintaining adherence to therapy is required along with confirmation of blood pressure levels above target by out-of-office blood pressure measurements and exclusion of secondary causes of hypertension. The key management points of this condition include lifestyle changes such as reduced sodium and alcohol intake, regular physical activity, weight loss and discontinuation of substances that can interfere with blood pressure control. It is also recommended that current treatment be rationalised, including single pill combination treatment where antihypertensive drugs should be provided at the maximum tolerated dose. It is further recommended that current drugs be replaced with a more appropriate and less difficult treatment regimen based on the patient’s age, ethnicity, comorbidities and risk of drug–drug interactions. The fourth line of treatment for patients with resistant hypertension should include mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as spironolactone, as demonstrated in the PATHWAY-2 trial and meta-analyses. Alternatives to spironolactone include amiloride, doxazosin, eplerenone, clonidine and beta-blockers, as well as any other antihypertensive drugs not already in use. New approaches under research are selective non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as finerenone, esaxerenone and ocedurenone, selective aldosterone synthase inhibitors such as baxdrostat, and dual endothelin antagonist aprocitentan.

Lipids are currently known to play an important role in bone metabolism.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) on osteoporotic fractures beyond its beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system.

This was a retrospective, observational study that used data from the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening cohort database.

This study included 318,237 participants who were 50 years or older and with HDL-C levels of 10 to 200 mg/dL.

Physiologic measure-Diagnosis of osteoporotic fracture during the follow-up period.

The study participants were categorized into four quartiles according to baseline HDL-C levels. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess osteoporotic fracture risk according to HDL-C levels.

After full adjustment and with the Q1 group as the reference group, estimates of hazard ratios (HRs; 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) for any osteoporotic fracture in men were 1.03 (0.94-1.12), 1.02 (0.93-1.11), and 1.07 (0.98-1.18) for the Q2, Q3, and Q4 groups, respectively. After classifying osteoporotic fractures according to the body location, the fully adjusted HRs for vertebral and hip fractures in the men's Q4 groups were 1.16 (1.02-1.31) and 0.74 (0.57-0.96), respectively. In women, fully adjusted HRs (95% CIs) of the female Q4 group for any osteoporotic, vertebral, and hip fractures were 1.03 (0.95-1.11), 0.96 (0.86-1.07), and 1.06 (0.80-1.41), respectively.

In this study, HDL-C levels were positively associated with vertebral fractures in both men and women but inversely related to hip fractures in men. Therefore, monitoring the lipid profiles of patients with osteoporosis may be beneficial for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures.