PPARγ x Lipid

Epidemiological studies suggest that consumption of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) derived from fish oil, mainly consisting of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), is associated with lower cardiovascular risk. However, interventional clinical trials aimed at reducing cardiovascular incidents by n-3 PUFAs supplementations have yielded inconsistent results. An intriguing fact is that only the outcome trials using EPA, but not those testing EPA/DHA mixed regimens, showed beneficial results. This discrepancy begs the question of whether EPA and DHA have differential effects and whether DHA blunts the cardiovascular benefits of EPA. However, no head-to-head clinical trial comparison of the biological effects of EPA and DHA in the hyperlipidemia patients has been reported. Hence, a well-designed, controlled, proof-of-concept clinical study testing EPA versus DHA in a relevant population is urgently required. In this study, the human subjects with atherogenic dyslipidemia will be randomized to dietary supplementation with four grams of either EPA or DHA n-3 PUFAs for eight weeks. At baseline and after the supplementation, various markers of thrombogenesis will be assessed, including biomarkers of the clotting cascade, thromboelastography, urinary thromboxane metabolites, whole blood aggregation, platelet aggregation, and flow cytometry analysis of platelets and platelet-leukocyte aggregates will also be performed.