AbstractBackground:Botulinum toxin injections are widely sought after in the field of medical aesthetics, offering consumers a variety of brand choices. Two commonly available botulinum toxin products, onabotulinumtoxinA and neubotulinumtoxinA, are featured in numerous clinics, leading many to question whether there are discernible differences in results, given their varying price ranges.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of neubotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of forehead horizontal lines.MethodsA 12‐week prospective, single‐centre, interventional split‐face study was conducted, including 30 subjects. These enrolled subjects received a single treatment session, with neubotulinumtoxinA applied to the left side of the forehead and onabotulinumtoxinA to the right side. A superficial injection was performed in all individuals, where the product was injected subdermally in the frontalis muscle. Evaluation was conducted at baseline, 7 days, 14, days and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after treatment, both when the eyebrows were at maximum lift and in a resting position. Treatment efficacy was assessed by two physicians and self‐assessed by the patients, using the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Classification system. Adverse events were documented to evaluate safety.ResultsThe study found no statistically significant difference in the efficacy of neubotulinum and onabotulinum for treating forehead wrinkles, as indicated by p‐values above 0.05 for both static and dynamic conditions. No safety and adverse events were observed in both formulations.ConclusionThis study has demonstrated that neither formulation is inferior to each other in the treatment of forehead horizontal lines.