更新于：2024-05-01
Intellectual Disability
智力障碍
更新于：2024-05-01
基本信息
别名 DEFICIENCY MENTAL、Deficiencies, Mental、Deficiency mental + [69] |
简介 Subnormal intellectual functioning which originates during the developmental period. This has multiple potential etiologies, including genetic defects and perinatal insults. Intelligence quotient (IQ) scores are commonly used to determine whether an individual has an intellectual disability. IQ scores between 70 and 79 are in the borderline range. Scores below 67 are in the disabled range. (from Joynt, Clinical Neurology, 1992, Ch55, p28) |
关联
靶点 |
作用机制 |
在研机构 |
原研机构 |
在研适应症 |
非在研适应症 |
最高研发阶段 |
首次获批国家/地区 |
首次获批日期 |
靶点 |
作用机制 |
在研机构 |
原研机构 |
在研适应症 |
非在研适应症 |
最高研发阶段 |
首次获批国家/地区 |
首次获批日期 |
靶点 |
作用机制 |
在研机构 |
原研机构 |
在研适应症 |
非在研适应症 |
最高研发阶段 |
首次获批国家/地区 |
首次获批日期 |
Enhancing Alcohol Treatment Engagement in ALD Patients
The Impact of Weight Loss on Alzheimer's Disease Risk in Adults With Down Syndrome
Use of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) in the Treatment of Repetitive Behaviors (RB) and Self-Injurious Behaviors (SIB) in Cornelia de Lange Syndrome: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study
100 项与 智力障碍 相关的临床结果
登录后查看更多信息
100 项与 智力障碍 相关的转化医学
登录后查看更多信息
登录后查看更多信息
2024-12-01The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians
Epidural ropivacaine versus bupivacaine for cesarean sections: a system review and meta-analysis.
Review
作者: Tao Kang ; Jiwei Tao ; Xuetao Wang ; Yu Liu ; Dan Jin
INTRODUCTION:
It is still no consensus on the use of ropivacaine or bupivacaine in epidural anesthesia for cesarean section (CS), because their anesthetic potency and relative complications remains controversial. This system review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective CSs and investigate relative complications for parturients and neonates.
METHODS:
We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Science-Direct, and Google Scholar to June 30, 2023 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which compared epidural ropivacaine with bupivacaine for elective CSs. The success rate of epidural anesthesia (EA) was primary outcome. The secondary outcomes included onset times of sensory block, maternal side effects, neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical artery pH.
RESULTS:
We analyzed 8 RCTs with 532 parturients. 0.75% ropivacaine is associated with a shorter onset time of sensory block than 0.5% bupivacaine (SMD = -0.43, 95% CI: -0.70 to -0.17; p = .001). 0.5% ropivacaine resulted in a reduced nausea than 0.5% bupivacaine (RR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28 to 0.83; p = .008). In addition, there were no significant difference between ropivacaine and bupivacaine groups in terms of success rate of epidural anesthesia, maternal side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, shivering), and neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical artery pH.
CONCLUSIONS:
The findings suggest that there were no significant difference between epidural ropivacaine and bupivacaine for elective CSs in terms of the success rate (85.9% vs. 83.5), maternal side effects (hypotension, bradycardia, shivering), and neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical artery pH. But compared with 0.5% bupivacaine, epidural 0.75% ropivacaine was mildly effective for reducing onset time of sensory block and 0.5% ropivacaine reduced the incidence of maternal nausea.
2024-12-01The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians
Pregnancy complications and loss: an observational survey comparing anesthesiologists and obstetrician-gynecologists.
Article
作者: Natalie R Barnett ; Renuka M George ; Katherine H Hatter ; Norah R Janosy ; Samantha J Vizzini ; Shubhangi Singh ; Rebecca E Lee ; Bethany J Wolf ; Camila Cabrera ; Amy L Duhachek-Stapelman ; Daniel Katz
OBJECTIVE:
While there is increasing information regarding the occupational risks to pregnant physicians, there is inconsistent and limited subspecialty data. Physicians may be at increased risk for pregnancy complications due to occupational exposure, long work hours, nightshifts, and physical/mental demands. Additionally, little is known regarding the education physicians receive pertaining to pregnancy risks respective to their specialties as well as departmental/institutional support for pregnancy loss or complication. Therefore, a survey was developed and distributed across multiple academic sites to ascertain if there is an inherent occupation-associated risk of pregnancy complication(s) and/or pregnancy loss for anesthesiologists (ANES) when compared to obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYN).
METHODS:
A specialty-specific survey was distributed electronically to attending ANES and OB/GYN, via departmental listservs at six participating academic medical centers. Responses were collected from March to October 2022 and included demographic information, practice characteristics, education about pregnancy risks and details of pregnancy complications and loss. The primary comparison between specialty groups was the occurrence of at least one pregnancy complication and/or loss. Logistic regression was used to evaluate specialty outcome associations. Additionally, complication rates and types between specialties were compared using univariate and multivariable models.
RESULTS:
The survey was distributed to 556 anesthesiology and 662 obstetrics-gynecology faculty members with 224 ANES and 168 OB/GYN respondents, yielding an overall 32.2% response rate. Of the survey respondents, 103 ANES and 116 OB/GYN reported at least one pregnancy. Demographics were similar between the two cohorts. ANES had higher gravidity and parity relative to OB/GYN and tended to be earlier in their career at first pregnancy (p = .008, <.001, and .043, respectively). The rate of any pregnancy complication, including loss, was similar between specialties (65.1% (67/103) vs. 65.5% (76/116), p = .942). Of the respondents reporting at least one pregnancy, 56.7% of ANES and 53.9% of OB/GYN experienced a complication while at work. Obstetrician-gynecologists had higher use of reproductive assistance (28% (47/116) vs. 11% (20/103), p < .001). There were no notable differences between cohorts for complications, prematurity, and neonatal intensive care admission. Forty-one percent (161/392) of total respondents recalled learning about occupational risks to pregnancy, and ANES were more likely than OB/GYN to have recalled learning about these risks (121/224 (54%) and 40/168 (23.8%), respectively, p < .001).
CONCLUSIONS:
ANES and OB/GYN had similar risks for pregnancy complications and loss. Anesthesiologists were more likely to recall receiving education regarding occupational risk to pregnancy, though fewer than half of all survey respondents recalled learning about these risks. Our survey results are similar to the previously identified higher rate of pregnancy complications and loss in female physicians while uncovering areas of potential knowledge gaps for which institutions and practices could strive to improve upon. More research is needed to examine the relationship between occupation and pregnancy risk pertaining to female physicians with the goal being to identify modifiable risk factors.
2024-12-01International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being
The experiences of family members of persons with intellectual disabilities who used residential care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article
作者: Montserrat Puig Llobet ; Montserrat Roca Roger ; Teresa Nicolàs Silva ; Gemma Pérez Gimenez ; Zaida Agüera ; Maria-Teresa Lluch Canut ; Juan Francisco Roldan Merino ; Carmen Moreno Arroyo ; Marta Prats Arimon ; Maria Aurelia Sánchez Ortega ; Xavier Domènech Mascaró ; Miguel Angel Hidalgo Blanco ; Antonio Moreno Poyato
BACKGROUND:
The global COVID-19 pandemic has shown the vulnerability of some population groups, including persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD).
AIM:
The present paper will provide more clarity and understanding of the experiences of family members of persons with IDD housed in residential facilities in Catalonia within the period of maximum restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS AND PROCEDURES:
Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interpretive phenomenological qualitative approach. Study participants consisted of 14 relatives of IDD individuals who were institutionalized in residence facilities or homes. The guiding questions emerged from group discussions with relatives of those with IDD who did not participate in the subsequent interviews. Drawing from this group, the factors that were identified to have had the greatest impact on their lives were later used to guide the interviews. Data collection was carried out in face-to-face individual interviews that were recorded together with the observations of two researchers between February and October 2022.
RESULTS:
Our analysis identified 4 main themes that developed into additional factors: the decision to stay at home or in the residence, fear, illness, and protocol. Individuals with IDD lost their daily routines, suffered from social isolation, and did not understand the situation.
CONCLUSION:
The results of this study allow for a better understanding of the experiences of families of persons with IDD in residential centres during the lockdown by identifying their needs and how to better support them in the future.
OUTCOMES AND RESULTS:
Knowledge and understanding of these events should allow for better management of similar situations in the future.
分析
对领域进行一次全面的分析。
登录
或
立即开始免费试用!
智慧芽新药情报库是智慧芽专为生命科学人士构建的基于AI的创新药情报平台，助您全方位提升您的研发与决策效率。
立即开始数据试用!
智慧芽新药库数据也通过智慧芽数据服务平台，以API或者数据包形式对外开放，助您更加充分利用智慧芽新药情报信息。
生物序列数据库
生物药研发创新
免费使用
化学结构数据库
小分子化药研发创新
免费使用