Epcoritamab

Presentations and publications address novel therapeutics, molecular biology studies, and global trends for blood cancers and solid tumors HACKENSACK, N.J., May 29, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Investigators from Hackensack Meridian John Theurer Cancer Center (JTCC)—part of the National Cancer Institute-designated Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown University—and Hackensack University Medical Center are reporting research findings from 32 studies at the 2025 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting. The meeting is the premier event for cancer professionals and takes place in Chicago from May 30 to June 3. "The future of cancer treatment begins with the pioneering exploration being carried out today," notes Andre Goy, MD, chair, vice president, physician-in-chief of oncology, at Hackensack Meridian John Theurer Cancer Center. "We are fortunate to be in a time where many cancers will respond to standard treatments. But for those cancers that don't, it's critical that patients have access to a world-class research program that will yield innovative therapies. At John Theurer Cancer Center, our globally recognized investigators continue to drive the latest oncology advances in cellular therapy, immunotherapy and other areas, enabling improved outcomes for patients across the Hackensack Meridian Health network and beyond." Several studies address novel drug combinations for multiple myeloma, as well as racial disparities in treatment outcomes and the expression of key biomarkers. Investigators are also presenting data on emerging immunotherapies for leukemia and lymphoma, molecular markers predicting disease relapse, and innovative treatment regimens such as all-oral therapies for acute myeloid leukemia. Solid tumor studies focus on disparities in gastric cancer, machine learning applications for breast cancer metastasis, and promising antibody-drug conjugates for lung cancer. Investigations related to melanoma and skin cancer examine circulating tumor DNA as a marker for disease progression, comparative survival analyses based on biomarkers, and the identification of targetable mutations across different skin cancer types. These findings underscore the breadth of ongoing efforts at John Theurer Cancer Center—New Jersey's largest cancer center—to refine therapeutic strategies, enhance precision oncology, and improve patient outcomes. Multiple Myeloma Research Carfilzomib, iberdomide, and dexamethasone in patients with transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Updated results from phase 1/2 study Updated results from phase 2b study of selinexor in combination with carfilzomib, daratumumab, or pomalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma relapsing on current therapy Real-world outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma treated with T-cell engagers compared to those treated on clinical trials Impact of racial disparities on efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with relapsing/refractory multiple myeloma receiving T-cell engagers Heterogeneity in the expression of GPRC5D between patients with multiple myeloma Evaluation of immune checkpoint inhibitors and concurrent radiation therapy for the treatment of extramedullary multiple myeloma Global burden of multiple myeloma: Analysis from 1980 to 2021 Efficacy and safety of less frequent dosing with elranatamab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A US subgroup analysis from MagnetisMM-3 Leukemia and Lymphoma Peripheral blood cell-free DNA testing as a predictor for relapse post-allogeneic stem cell transplant for acute myeloid leukemia An all-oral regimen of decitabine-cedazuridine plus venetoclax in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy: Results from a phase 2 cohort of 101 pts Employing novel pan-cancer targets for immunotherapy in leukemias and solid tumors MRD negativity after end of induction in the phase 3 PhALLCON trial: A post hoc analysis Results from the completed dose-finding part of phase 2 study of the innate cell engager acimtamig (AFM13) in combination with AlloNK (AB-101) in relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (LuminICE-203) Novel analysis of 3-y results from the pivotal EPCORE NHL-1 study: Outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma and complete response at 2 years with epcoritamab monotherapy TITANium: An open-label, global multicenter phase 1/2 study of AZD5492, a first-in-class subcutaneous CD8-guided tri-specific T-cell engager, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell malignancies Solid Tumor Research Limited changes in the central nervous system immune microenvironment in patients with breast cancer metastasis and capturing these changes using machine learning Relationship between FOLR1 expression and pan-cancer subgroup of tumors with specific transcriptomic profile Disparities and trends in gastric cancer: Incidence, mortality, and stage-specific trends Prevalence of the HPV, EBV, and TTV viral RNA in the plasma of patients with solid and hematologic neoplasms and the detection of a specific immune signature Global trends in soft tissue and extraosseous sarcomas (1980–2021): Regional and economic disparities ZL-1310, a DLL3 antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer: Phase 1 trial update Ongoing phase 1/2 trial of the hematopoietic progenitor kinase 1 (HPK1) inhibitor NDI-101150 as monotherapy or in combination with pembrolizumab: Clinical safety and efficacy update in clear cell renal cell carcinoma Ipilimumab and nivolumab in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated on the phase 3 PDIGREE (Alliance A031704) trial: Results from Step 1 analysis Initial safety and efficacy results from a first-in-human, phase 1/2 study of SAR445877, an anti-PD-1/IL-15 fusion protein, for patients with advanced solid tumors An open-label, phase I trial of the SIRPα monoclonal antibody, BI 770371, alone and in combination with the PD-1 inhibitor ezabenlimab in patients with advanced solid tumors A phase 1 dose escalation and dose expansion study for LNCB74, a B7-H4 targeted antibody drug conjugate, as monotherapy in participants with advanced solid tumors A phase 1, open-label, multi-center study of the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of IPH4502 as a single agent in advanced solid tumors A phase 2 safety and efficacy study of PRT3789 in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors and a SMARCA4 mutation Phase 3, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of CAN-2409+prodrug in combination with standard of care external beam radiation (EBRT) for newly diagnosed localized prostate cancer Melanoma and Other Skin Cancers Comparison of ctDNA and hematologic ratios as markers of disease progression in early versus late-stage melanoma: A single-center retrospective study Survival analysis based on markers of progression in melanoma: A single-center comparison of survival in patients with high vs low biomarkers Targetable mutations in cutaneous skin cancers: A comparative study across melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma SOURCE Hackensack Meridian John Theurer Cancer Center WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM? 440k+ Newsrooms & Influencers 9k+ Digital Media Outlets 270k+ Journalists Opted In GET STARTED

iStock, Prostock-Studio R&D spending across the global pharmaceutical sector climbed 1.5% in 2024, according to unreleased data from Evaluate Pharma. Even with strong macro headwinds —inflation, rising costs, geopolitical tensions —the global pharmaceuticals industry continued to pump more money into R&D investments in 2024. That’s according to data from analyst firm Evaluate Pharma, which in an email gave BioSpace a sneak peek at their World Preview 2025 report, set to be published in June 2025. Pharma R&D spending in 2024 grew by 1.5%, a relatively modest jump by the industry’s own standards, considering that from 2022 to 2023, budgets soared 11.5%. Still, R&D spending last year was staggering: drugmakers the world over pumped nearly $288 billion into research and development. “R&D is central to refreshing product portfolios, which have a natural lifecycle owing to patents and exclusivity periods,” Daniel Chancellor, VP of thought leadership at Norstella, Evaluate’s parent company, told BioSpace . “Without reinvestment into R&D (or business development), revenues are increasingly at risk of competition and will inevitably decline.” This is why Evaluate estimates that the industry will continue to grow their R&D budgets through the end of the decade—which, as per its yet-to-be-released data, could reach just under $340 billion by 2030—even as the political and economic environment grows increasingly unwelcoming. “R&D spending will continue to grow, thankfully because industry revenue growth is robust,” Chancellor assured BioSpace . He qualified this assertion, however, by noting that Evaluate “expects R&D margins to decline” as companies continue to enact “cost containment measures” to surmount the increasing number of external challenges to their businesses. These challenges include tariffs, drug pricing and the cost of capital. In the context of these high-level barriers, Guglielmo Bruni Roccia, senior pharmaceutical industry analyst at BMI, a Fitch Solutions company, offered a more pessimistic view of R&D spending patterns in the coming years. President Donald Trump’s Most Favored Nation drug pricing policy , for example, “could result in compression of U.S. revenues, which would in turn reduce available R&D funding,” Roccia told BioSpace . “With constrained revenue streams, we expect pharmaceutical companies will likely prioritize R&D projects with greater certainty of profitability and where they have a greater competitive advantage,” he added. Still, there is reason to be optimistic. Experts who spoke with BioSpace pointed to the industry’s spending spree, particularly in manufacturing , as a promising signal. “Infrastructure investments enhance R&D capabilities, indicating a complementary rather than competitive relationship,” Roccia explained, noting that a manufacturing push “will support and potentially boost R&D activities rather than hinder them.” Norstella’s Chancellor agreed, adding that “these new facilities will rely on the success of R&D to produce the drugs of tomorrow, as well as meeting demand for current portfolios.” Dealmaking appears to be continuing at pace, as well. Despite an increasingly tricky political thicket , the first quarter witnessed a rush of M&A and licensing deals, with the industry earmarking some $40 billion for business development initiatives. This bodes well for the industry, since deals contributed heavily to the encouraging R&D trend in 2024. All top spenders in this list are anchored by a major contract at least hundreds of millions of dollars in value, bolstered by additional spending to beef up their pipelines. Below, BioSpace looks at the pharma industry’s most prolific investors in R&D and how they are using these budgets to advance their business. Merck Reigns Even After Scaling Back R&D Spend: $17.9 billion YoY Change: -41% In 2023, Merck went on an expensive deal-making spree. The pharma acquired immune specialist Prometheus Biosciences for $10.8 billion , licensed three of Daiichi Sankyo’s antibody-drug conjugates for $4 billion upfront and inked a potential $2.55 billion molecular glue deal with Proxygen, among other transactions. With a particularly bloated R&D purse in 2023, the 41% decrease in spending last year is more of a rightsizing of Merck’s budget than a steep scale-back. Indeed, the company still came out ahead of its Big Pharma peers with a hefty $17.94 billion investment, corresponding to 28% of its total revenue. “With the looming loss of exclusivity of Merck’s Keytruda, Merck has ramped up R&D efforts to address the nearly $30 billion revenue gap left by the drug,” Ophelia Chan, senior business fundamentals analyst at GlobalData, told BioSpace. “It’s worth keeping a close eye on [Merck’s] pipeline, which includes around 20 potential new blockbuster candidates that could collectively generate over $50 billion in the future,” Chan added. Among them is ifinatamab deruxtecan, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) that targets B7-H3, a transmembrane protein over expressed in various cancers. Merck is running the Phase III IDeate-Esophageal01 study to test the ADC in advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ifinatamab deruxtecan is also being proposed for heavily pretreated advanced small cell lung cancer, for which it is in late-stage development . Merck is also testing tulisokibart (MK-7240), which was picked up in the $10.8 billion acquisition of Prometheus Biosciences, in multiple inflammatory diseases . Phase II data, published in the New England Journal of Medicine in September 2024, showed that a higher percentage of ulcerative colitis patients treated with the anti-TL1A antibody achieved clinical remission versus placebo. Tulisokibart is in Phase III development for ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Merck CEO Robert Davis told investors in February that he expects blockbuster opportunities from the pharma’s ophthalmology business, which received a $1.3 billion boost last year with the May acquisition of the eye specialist EyeBio. The centerpiece of the acquisition is the trispecific antibody Restoret being assessed for diabetic macular edema (DME) and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD). In September 2024, Merck kicked off the Phase IIb/III trial for Restoret in DME. The study, dubbed BRUNELLO , is set to complete by the end of 2027. Johnson & Johnson Strong in Cancer and Immuno—but not Neuro R&D Spend: $17.2 billion YoY Change: 14.2% J&J started 2024 by renewing its focus on its three main priority therapeutic areas—“oncology, immunology and neuroscience,” CEO Joaquin Duato told investors during the pharma’s full-year 2023 earning call—and the pharma’s R&D spending last year largely reflected this. For instance, J&J paid $2 billion to acquire Ambrx in January 2024. The bet builds out the pharma’s portfolio of ADCs, which in recent years have become a major focus in cancer therapy. In addition, J&J last year made two hefty investments into its immuno business: the $850 million acquisition of Proteologix and its pipeline of anti-inflammatory dermatology assets, and a $1.25 billion payment to Numab Therapeutics for its bispecific antibody for atopic dermatitis. All told, J&J spent more than $17.2 billion on R&D last year, accounting for over 19% of its total revenue. This sum also covers its medtech investments. Even as these deals helped J&J populate its early- and mid-stage pipelines, the pharma last year likewise pushed its late-stage assets forward. In immuno, for instance, the company in August 2024 sought approval for its monoclonal antibody nipocalimab in myasthenia gravis, which was ultimately granted in April to be marketed as Imaavy. Notably, neuroscience was a weak point for J&J’s 2024 R&D agenda. In October 2024, the pharma pruned its early- and mid-stage neuro pipeline, leaving the investigational human orexin-2 receptor blocker seltorexant on the cutting room floor. J&J had been studying seltorexant for agitation and aggression in Alzheimer’s disease. The company also axed a Phase II ion channel blocker for bipolar depression and a Phase I Parkinson’s disease therapy. J&J seems set on changing that this year, however, starting 2025 strong with the massive $14.6 billion acquisition of Intra-Cellular Therapies. Roche’s Mixed Year for Cancer R&D Spend: CHF 13 billion ($15.8 billion) YoY Change: 1% During its full-year 2024 business report in February 2024, Roche leaders recognized that sales were stagnating, driven largely by tanking demand for its COVID-19 products and currency difficulties at the time. The company identified dealmaking as one of its care strategies to revitalize growth. Still, unlike Merck and J&J, which enacted substantial changes to their budgets, Roche’s R&D spending in 2024 remained largely flat year-on-year. The Swiss company poured just over CHF 13 billion ($15.8 billion) in its R&D and business development efforts last year, a slight 1% increase from 2023. 2024 also posed formidable challenges to Roche’s R&D efforts in cancer. In July 2024, for instance, the company’s anti-TIGIT antibody tiragolumab failed to significantly improve progression-free survival in the Phase II/III SKYSCRAPER-06 study in NSCLC, forcing Roche to discontinue that trial. A few months later, in November, tiragolumab again delivered disappointing NSCLC outcomes . Perhaps reflecting these difficulties in oncology development, Roche in April 2024 axed three early-stage cancer assets, including camonsertinib, which it was testing for solid tumors. In August, Roche closed down the cancer immunology unit of its subsidiary Genentech, with a spokesperson at the time pointing to “shifts in the science of immuno-oncology” as the reason for the shake-up. Despite some obstructions in oncology, Roche in 2024 saw notable progress in its obesity portfolio, anchored by the assets it obtained from its $2.7 billion acquisition of Carmot Therapeutics in December 2023. Last May, the pharma announced that Carmot’s CT-388, a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, could lower bodyweight by 18.8% versus placebo at 24 weeks. Roche followed this up with a July 2024 readout for another Carmot asset, the oral GLP-1 receptor agonist CT-996. Phase I data at the time showed that the pill can cut weight by 6.1% versus placebo after four weeks. Roche’s standout deal last year was the November 2024 acquisition of Poseida Therapeutics for $1 billion upfront. Roche and Poseida are long-time partners , and the acquisition strengthens their CAR T collaboration, targeting multiple myeloma and B cell lymphomas, among other blood cancers. With more than half of the year left to go, it remains unclear how Roche’s R&D budget will change in 2025—though it’s unlikely that the pharma will go on a big spending spree soon. During its full-year business report in February, CEO Thomas Schinecker said that Roche will remain “ disciplined ” with dealmaking this year, focusing only on assets that make strong financial sense for the company. AstraZeneca Upped Investment to Buff Pipeline R&D Spend: $13.6 billion YoY Change: 25% AstraZeneca opened 2024 with a commitment to “investing in new technologies and new products to shape the future of medicine,” CEO Pascal Soriot said in February 2024 during the pharma’s full-year 2023 earnings call. A month later, in March, AstraZeneca made good on this commitment by inking two high-ticket acquisitions to build out its late-stage pipeline. The first of these deals is with Amolyt Pharma, which the pharma acquired for $800 million upfront . A few days later, AstraZeneca dropped $2 billion to acquire Fusion Pharmaceuticals. From Amolyt, AstraZeneca received the hypoparathyroidism candidate eneboparatide, which recently aced a Phase III trial , along with other assets being developed for rare diseases. Meanwhile, Fusion gave AstraZeneca its radiopharma pipeline, anchored by FPI-2265, an actinium-225 radioconjugate therapy being proposed for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. AstraZeneca last year also poured money into the opposite end of its pipeline, expanding its early-stage portfolio with a $19 million deal with Nona Biosciences in May 2024 for several preclinical monoclonal antibodies for cancer. That same month, AstraZeneca started putting bets in the lucrative obesity arena by paying $80 million to support Versant Ventures startup SixPeaks, which will work on next-generation, muscle-preserving weight-loss drugs. One of AstraZeneca’s most closely watched assets is its Daiichi Sankyo-partnered antibody-drug conjugate Dato-DXd. Despite winning FDA approval earlier this year for breast cancer under the brand name Datroway, the molecule ran into a rough patch last year, failing two Phase III trials in September—one in breast cancer and another in non-small cell lung cancer . Elsewhere in AstraZeneca’s cancer pipeline, the AKT blocker Truqap in November 2024 delivered a late-stage victory , significantly improving radiographic progression-free survival in certain types of prostate cancer. In April, however, Truqap stumbled in a Phase III prostate cancer, pushing the pharma to axe the Phase III CAPItell-280 study. AstraZeneca appears to be sustaining the pace of its R&D spending into the new year. In March alone, for instance, the pharma put $1 billion on the line to acquire EsoBiotec and its cell therapy pipeline, and signed two agreements with South Korea’s Alteogen to collaborate on subcutaneous cancer therapies. All told, AstraZeneca’s payments to Alteogen could total $1.35 billion . AbbVie Makes Strong Neuro Push R&D Spend: $12.8 billion YoY Change: 60% Of all the companies on this list, AbbVie saw the biggest increase in its R&D spending, soaring 60% year-on-year to hit nearly $12.8 billion. Likely the biggest contributing factor is the pharma’s $8.7 billion acquisition of Cerevel Therapeutics in December 2023. The star of this buyout was the next-generation antipsychotic agent emraclidine, which ultimately failed a pair of Phase II trials, forcing investors to question AbbVie’s neuro strategy. The Cerevel acquisition wasn’t a complete wash for AbbVie, however. In September 2024, just a month after closing the transaction, the pharma notched a late-stage clinical win in Parkinson’s disease with tavapadon. Beyond Cerevel, AbbVie sustained its neuro push in 2024, linking up with Gilgamesh Pharmaceuticals in May 2024 for $65 million upfront and up to $1.95 billion in option and milestone fees. The partnership is focused on developing psychedelic therapies for psychiatric indications. Outside of neuro, AbbVie in 2024 leaned further into its main area of expertise—immunology —putting up $250 million to acquire Massachusetts biotech Celsius Therapeutics and its investigational antibody for inflammatory bowel diseases. Oncology also saw a lot of progress for AbbVie last year, including a slew of positive readouts in ovarian cancer, non-small cell lung cancer and other solid tumors at ESMO 2024. A few months later, in December, the pharma likewise released data supporting the use of its bispecific T cell–engaging antibody epcoritamab as a monotherapy or as part of a combination regimen in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Despite being among pharma’s top R&D spenders, AbbVie doesn’t seem to be resting on its laurels. Already, the company has made several deals this year that could top $1 billion. In January, AbbVie teamed up with Neomorph to develop molecular glue degraders, putting up to $1.64 billion on the line for this partnership.