AstraZeneca, Inc.

The regulation of drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters by cytokines has been extensively studied, in vitro and in clinic. Cytokine-mediated suppression of CYPs or drug transporters may increase or decrease the systemic clearance of drug substrates that are primarily cleared via these pathways; neutralization of cytokines by therapeutic proteins may thereby alter systemic exposures of such drug substrates. The FDA recommends evaluating such clinical drug interactions during clinical development and has provided labeling recommendations for therapeutic proteins. To determine the clinical relevance of these drug interactions to dose adjustments, trends in steady-state exposures (AUC_ss) of CYP-sensitive substrates co-administered with cytokine modulators as reported in the UW DIDB were extracted and examined for each of the CYPs. Co-administration of CYP3A (midazolam/simvastatin), CYP2C19 (omeprazole), or CYP1A2 (caffeine/tizanidine) substrates with anti-IL-6 and with anti-IL-23 therapeutics led to changes in systemic exposures of CYP substrates ranging from ~ -58% to ~35%; no significant trends were observed for CYP2D6 (dextromethorphan) and CYP2C9 (warfarin) substrates. Although none of these changes in systemic exposures have been reported as clinically meaningful, dose adjustment of midazolam for optimal sedation in acute care settings has been reported. Simulated concentration-time profiles of midazolam under conditions of elevated cytokine levels when co-administered with tocilizumab, suggest a ~6-7 fold increase in midazolam clearance suggesting potential implications of cytokine- CYP drug interactions on dose adjustments of sensitive CYP3A substrates in acute care settings. Additionally, this article also provides a brief overview of non-clinical and clinical assessments of cytokine-CYP drug interactions, in drug discovery and development. Significance Statement Significance statement: There has been significant progress in understanding cytokine-mediated drug interactions for CYP-sensitive substrates. This article provides an overview of the progress in this field, including a trend analysis of systemic exposures of CYP-sensitive substrates co-administered with anti-IL-x therapeutics. In addition, the review also provides a perspective of current methods used to assess these drug interactions during drug development, and a focus on individualized medicine, particularly in acute care settings.

Accurate measurement of non-specific binding of a drug candidate to human liver microsomes (HLM) can be critical for the accurate determination of key enzyme kinetic parameters such as Michaelis-Menton (K_m), reversible inhibition (K_i), or inactivation (K_I) constants. Several methods have been developed to determine non-specific binding of small molecules to HLM, such as rapid equilibrium dialysis (RED), ultrafiltration (UF), HLM bound to magnetizable beads (HLM-beads), ultracentrifugation (UC), the linear extrapolation stability assay (LESA), and the Transil™ system. Despite various differences in methodology between these methods, it is generally presumed that similar free fraction values (f_u,mic) should be generated. To evaluate this hypothesis, a test set of 9 compounds were selected, representing low (high f_u,mic value) and significant (low f_u,mic value) HLM binding, respectively, across HLM concentrations tested in this manuscript. The f_u,mic values were determined using a single compound concentration (1.0 µM) and three HLM concentrations (0.025, 0.50, and 1.0 mg/mL). When the HLM non-specific binding event is not extensive resulting in high f_u,mic values, all methods generated similar f_u,mic values. However, f_u,mic values varied markedly across assay formats when high binding to HLM occurred, where f_u,mic values differed by up to 33-fold depending on the method used. Potential causes for such discrepancies across the various methods employed, practical implications related to conduct the different assays, and implications to clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) predictions are discussed.

After single oral dosing of the glycine reuptake transporter (GlyT1) inhibitor, iclepertin (BI 425809), a single major circulating metabolite, M530a, was identified. However, upon multiple dosing, a second major metabolite, M232, was observed with exposure levels ~ twofold higher than M530a. Studies were conducted to characterize the metabolic pathways and enzymes responsible for formation of both major human metabolites.

In vitro studies were conducted with human and recombinant enzyme sources and enzyme-selective inhibitors. The production of iclepertin metabolites was monitored by LC-MS/MS.

Iclepertin undergoes rapid oxidation to a putative carbinolamide that spontaneously opens to an aldehyde, M528, which then undergoes reduction by carbonyl reductase to the primary alcohol, M530a. However, the carbinolamide can also undergo a much slower oxidation by CYP3A to form an unstable imide metabolite, M526, that is subsequently hydrolyzed by a plasma amidase to form M232. This difference in rate of metabolism of the carbinolamine explains why high levels of the M232 metabolite were not observed in vitro and in single dose studies in humans, but were observed in longer-term multiple dose studies.

The long half-life iclepertin metabolite M232 is formed from a common carbinolamine intermediate, that is also a precursor of M530a. However, the formation of M232 occurs much more slowly, likely contributing to its extensive exposure in vivo. These results highlight the need to employ adequate clinical study sampling periods and rigorous characterization of unexpected metabolites, especially when such metabolites are categorized as major, thus requiring safety assessment.