Phytonadione

This review aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of apixaban vs. vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients on dialysis.

All types of studies published on PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science up to 10 September 2023 and comparing outcomes of apixaban vs. VKA in dialysis patients were eligible.

Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and six retrospective studies were included. Apixaban treatment was associated with significantly lower risk of major bleeding (RR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.48, 0.77; I² = 50%) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.98, I² = 9%) compared to VKA. Meta-analysis also showed that the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.85, I² = 16%) and intracranial bleeding (RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.84, I² = 0%) was significantly reduced with apixaban. Meta-analysis showed no difference in the risk of ischemic stroke (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.06, 2.69, I² = 0%), mortality (RR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.74, 2.16, I² = 94%) and recurrent venous thromboembolism (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87, 1.21, I² = 0%) between the two groups. Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed no difference in bleeding outcomes.

Low-quality evidence from a mix of RCTs and retrospective studies shows that apixaban may have better safety and equivalent efficacy as compared to VKA in dialysis patients. Apixaban treatment correlated with significantly reduced risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in observational studies but not in RCTs. The predominance of retrospective data warrants caution in the interpretation of results.

Calciphylaxis (CP) is a serious, potentially life-threatening disease that presents with medial calcification of small-sized vessels and painful ischemic ulcerations. Although calciphylaxis is frequently seen in patients with end-stage kidney disease on dialysis (calcific uremic arteriolopathy, CUA), there are reported cases of nonuremic calciphylaxis (NUC), which often remain undiagnosed. We conducted a retrospective chart review at our dermatological hospital and evaluated data concerning the epidemiology, comorbidities, medication, laboratory abnormalities, and therapeutic approaches of 60 patients diagnosed with calciphylaxis between 01/2012 and 12/2022. We identified 21 patients diagnosed with NUC and 39 with kidney disease. The predilection sites of skin lesions were the lower legs in 88% (n = 53), followed by the thigh and gluteal regions in 7% (n = 4). Significant differences were identified in comorbidities, such as atrial fibrillation (p < 0.001) and hyperparathyroidism (p < 0.01) accounting for CUA patients. Medication with vitamin K antagonists (p < 0.001), phosphate binders (p < 0.001), and loop diuretics (p < 0.01) was found to be associated with the onset of calciphylaxis. Hyperphosphatemia (p < 0.001), increased parathyroid hormone (p < 0.01) and triglyceride levels (p < 0.01), hypoalbuminemia (p < 0.01) and decreased hemoglobin values (p < 0.001) in the CUA cohort were significantly different from those in the NUC group. All patients with CUA received systemic medication. In contrast, only 38% (n = 8) of patients with NUC received systemic treatment. Striking discrepancies in the treatment of both cohorts were detected. In particular, NUC remains a disease pattern that is still poorly understood and differs from CUA in several important parameters.