A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Combination of Beleodaq-CHOP or Folotyn-COP to the CHOP Regimen Alone in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma

Part 1: This is a 5 Arm study primarily to determine the best dose out of the two dose levels of Belinostat and Pralatrexate combined with CHOP/COP in newly diagnosed PTCL patients based on Safety for part 2 study.
Part 2 (Efficacy and Safety): This is a 3 Arm study. Patients with previously untreated PTCL will be randomized 1:1:1 into 1 of 3 treatment groups: 2 experimental treatment groups (Bel-CHOP or Fol-COP) or 1 active comparator treatment group (CHOP). Patients will be treated for up to 6 cycles. The primary objective is to compare the Progression Free Survival of patients with newly diagnosed PTCL treated for up to 6 cycles with Beleodaq (belinostat) in combination with CHOP (Bel-CHOP) or Folotyn (pralatrexate injection) in combination with COP (Fol-COP) to CHOP alone.

开始日期2023-10-04

申办/合作机构

Acrotech Biopharma LLC初创企业

NCT05608343 / Completed临床3期

A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Vehicle-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Difamilast Ointment 1% in Children, Adolescents, and Adults With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

This is a Phase 3 Double Blind multi-center study conducted at 40 investigational sites in United States to assess the efficacy and safety of Difamilast Ointment 1% in subjects ≥2 years of age with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis.

开始日期2022-10-01

申办/合作机构

Acrotech Biopharma LLC初创企业

NCT05571943 / Completed临床3期

A Multicenter, Open-label Study to Assess the Long-term Safety of Difamilast Ointment 1% in the Treatment of Children, Adolescents and Adults With Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis

This is a Phase 3, open-label study to evaluate the long-term safety of difamilast ointment 1% in subjects ≥2 years of age with mild to moderate AD. The study will also evaluate the long-term efficacy of difamilast ointment 1%, including durability of response.

开始日期2022-09-15

申办/合作机构

Acrotech Biopharma LLC初创企业

100 项与 Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. 相关的临床结果

登录后查看更多信息

0 项与 Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. 相关的专利（医药）

登录后查看更多信息

项与 Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. 相关的文献（医药）

2018-07-01·AAPS PharmSciTech3区 · 医学

Effects of Formulation Variables on Lung Dosimetry of Albuterol Sulfate Suspension and Beclomethasone Dipropionate Solution Metered Dose Inhalers

3区 · 医学

Article

作者: Sheth, Poonam ; Conti, Denise S ; Price, Owen T ; Holt, Jay T ; Schroeter, Jeffry D ; Saluja, Bhawana ; Asgharian, Bahman ; Hickey, Anthony J

The performance of pressurized metered dose inhalers (MDIs) is affected by formulation and device variables that impact delivered dose, aerodynamic particle size distribution, and consequently lung deposition and therapeutic effect. Specific formulation variables of relevance to two commercially available products-Proventil® HFA [albuterol sulfate (AS) suspension] and Qvar® [beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) solution]-were evaluated to determine their influence on key performance attributes measured experimentally with in vitro cascade impaction studies. These commercial MDIs, utilized as model systems, provided mid-points for a design of experiments (DoE) plan to manufacture multiple suspension and solution MDI formulations. The experimental results were utilized as input variables in a computational dosimetry model to predict the effects of MDI formulation variables on lung deposition. For the BDP solution DoE MDIs, increased concentrations of surfactant oleic acid (0-2% w/w) increased lung deposition from 24 to 46%, whereas changes in concentration of the cosolvent ethanol (7-9% w/w) had no effect on lung deposition. For the AS suspension DoE MDIs, changes in oleic acid concentration (0.005-0.25% w/w) did not have significant effects on lung deposition, whereas lung deposition decreased from 48 to 26% as ethanol concentration increased from 2 to 20% w/w, and changes in micronized drug volumetric median particle size distribution (X₅₀, 1.4-2.5 μm) increased deposition in the tracheobronchial airways from 5 to 11%. A direct correlation was observed between fine particle fraction and predicted lung deposition. These results demonstrate the value of using dosimetry models to further explore relationships between performance variables and lung deposition.

2017-09-01·The AAPS Journal3区 · 医学

Influence of Formulation Factors on the Aerosol Performance of Suspension and Solution Metered Dose Inhalers: A Systematic Approach

3区 · 医学

Article

作者: Saluja, Bhawana ; Hickey, Anthony J ; Conti, Denise S ; Sheth, Poonam ; Holt, Jay T ; Sandell, Dennis

Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are complex drug-device combination products widely used to treat pulmonary disorders. The efficacy, driven by aerosol performance of the products, depends on a multitude of factors including, but not limited to, the physicochemical properties of drug and nature and amount of excipient(s). Under the quality by design (QbD) paradigm, systematic investigations are necessary to understand how changes in critical quality attributes (CQAs) of formulation, device, and manufacturing process influence key product performance parameters, such as delivered dose (DD) and fine particle dose (FPD). The purpose of this work is to provide a better understanding of the effects of different levels of excipients and drug particle size distribution on the aerosol performance of MDI products, while using two fundamentally different MDI products as relevant model systems, Proventil® HFA (albuterol sulfate suspension) and Qvar® (beclomethasone dipropionate solution). These MDI products, as model systems, provided mid-points around which a design of experiments (DOE), consisting of 22 suspension and 9 solution MDI formulations, were defined and manufactured. The DOE included formulations factors with varying ethanol (2 to 20% w/w and 7 to 9% w/w for the suspension and solution, respectively) and oleic acid concentrations (0.005 to 0.25% w/w and 0 to 2% w/w for the suspension and solution, respectively) and drug volumetric median particle size distribution (PSD D₅₀, 1.4 to 2.5 μm for the suspension). The MDI formulations were analyzed using compendial methods to elucidate the effect of these formulation variables (ethanol, oleic acid, and PSD D₅₀) on DD and FPD. The outcomes of this study allowed defining design spaces for the formulation factors, such that DD and FPD would remain within specific pre-defined requirements. The systematic approach utilized in this work can contribute as a QbD tool to evaluate the extent to which the formulation factors govern the aerosol performance of MDI drug products, helping to design MDI formulations with desired product performance parameters.

2016-03-01·Pharmaceutical Research3区 · 医学

In Vivo Toxicity and Immunological Characterization of Detoxified Recombinant Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A

3区 · 医学

Article

作者: Riding, Stephen ; Janardhanan, Pavithra ; Singh, Bal Ram ; Cai, Shuowei ; Patel, Kruti ; Ravichandran, Easwaran

PURPOSEA double-mutant E224A/E262A full-length botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) Type A with structural similarity to native BoNT/A but lacking the endopeptidase activity provides an ideal surrogate for testing pharmacokinetics and immunochemical characteristics of BoNT.METHODSWe determined lethality (LD50) of deactivated recombinant botulinum neurotoxin (drBoNT/A) to be 24.0 μg by intraperitoneal route (i.p). The polypeptide drBoNT/A labeled with near infra-red dye 800 (NIR 800) was used to examine its distribution to different organs using whole body imaging when administered to mice via intravenous (i.v) or i.p route. Also, drBoNT/A was used to evaluate its immunogenicity in Balb/C mice model.RESULTSdrBoNT/A was found to be highly immunogenic when tested under various in vivo conditions in Balb/C mice model. For the first time we have demonstrated that a full length 150 kDa drBoNT/A, by administering via inhalation route in mice model, has evoked both circulating immunoglobulin levels of IgG and secretory IgA at the mucosal surface. The immunoglobulin levels were sufficient enough to protect against the challenge dose of native BoNT toxin in mice model. Tissue distribution of drBoNT/A seems to be similar to that of native toxin.CONCLUSIONSBased on the characteristics described in this report this nontoxic holotoxin protein will assist us to explore the window of opportunity available for therapeutic treatment in case of unnatural poisoning, and also it can be an effective vaccine candidate.

项与 Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. 相关的新闻（医药）

2024-10-17

·GlobeNewswire-Health Care

Amicus Therapeutics Announces Settlement of Galafold® (migalastat) Patent Litigation with Teva

Company Grants Teva a License to Market Generic Galafold® Beginning in January 2037PRINCETON, N.J., Oct. 17, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Amicus Therapeutics (Nasdaq: FOLD) today announced that it has entered into a License Agreement (Agreement) with Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (collectively Teva). This Agreement resolves the patent litigation brought by Amicus in response to Teva’s Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) seeking approval to market a generic version of GALAFOLD® (migalastat) 123mg capsules prior to expiration of the applicable patents. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Amicus will grant Teva a license to market its generic version of GALAFOLD® in the United States beginning on January 30, 2037, if approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and unless certain limited circumstances customarily included in these types of agreements occur. In accordance with the Agreement, the parties will terminate all ongoing Hatch-Waxman litigation between Amicus and Teva regarding GALAFOLD® patents pending in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware. The litigation will continue against Aurobindo1 as the remaining active party and the litigation stay remains in place for Lupin2. As required by law, the companies will submit the confidential license agreement to the U.S. Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice for review. About Amicus Therapeutics Amicus Therapeutics (Nasdaq: FOLD) is a global, patient-dedicated biotechnology company focused on discovering, developing and delivering novel high-quality medicines for people living with rare diseases. With extraordinary patient focus, Amicus Therapeutics is committed to advancing and expanding a pipeline of cutting-edge, first- or best-in-class medicines for rare diseases. For more information please visit the company’s website at www.amicusrx.com, and follow on X and LinkedIn. Forward Looking StatementThis press release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including but not limited to, statements concerning: the terms of the settlement agreement with Teva, expectations regarding the impact of the settlement agreement and submission of the settlement agreement for review to the United States Federal Trade Commission and the United States Department of Justice. The company cautions that forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain. Although the company believes that such statements are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of its knowledge of its business and operations, the forward-looking statements are neither promises nor guarantees and they are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk. Actual performance and results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements due to various risks and uncertainties, including the unfavorable outcome of other litigation, including so-called "Paragraph IV" litigation and other patent litigation, related to GALAFOLD, which may lead to competition from generic drug manufacturers; the outcome of any review of the settlement agreement by the United States Federal Trade Commission and United States Department of Justice; the U.S. FDA may approve Teva's ANDA significantly in advance of the entry date; and those risks and uncertainties described under the heading "Risk Factors" in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, and on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2024. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. All forward-looking statements are qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement, and we undertake no obligation to revise or update this news release to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof. CONTACT: Investors:Amicus TherapeuticsAndrew FaughnanVice President, Investor Relationsafaughnan@amicusrx.com (609) 662-3809 Media:Amicus TherapeuticsDiana MooreHead of Global Corporate Affairs and Communicationsdmoore@amicusrx.com (609) 662-5079 FOLD–G 1 Aurobindo Pharma LTD and Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.2 Lupin LTD and Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

引进/卖出专利侵权

2024-06-19

·Firstwordpharma

Dizal's JAK1 drug gets China nod for peripheral T-cell lymphoma

Chinese regulators have approved Dizal's JAK1 inhibitor golidocitinib for adult patients with relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL).The decision makes it "the world's first JAK1-only inhibitor" for PTCL patients, noted CEO Xiaolin Zhang, as well as the second approved drug from Dizal after the AstraZeneca spinout's lung cancer treatment sunvozertinib was waved through in China last year.While a few drugs have been granted conditional regulatory approvals in the relapsed or refractory PTCL setting, Dizal noted that their single-agent activities have been "modest," with objective response rates (ORRs) below 30%.During an advisory panel meeting last November, the FDA raised questions about accelerated approvals for Acrotech Biopharma's folate analogue inhibitor Folotyn (pralatrexate) and HDAC inhibitor Beleodaq (belinostat) in relapsed/refractory PTCL after both their confirmatory trials experienced major delays.However, Dizal says its drug has demonstrated "superior and durable" clinical benefits in the pivotal JACKPOT8B study, compared with these existing treatment options. Data from the trial presented last year showed an ORR of 44.3% with golidocitinib, including a 23.9% complete response rate.Median duration of response was 20.7 months and 53.8% of patients were still responding. Moreover, tumour responses were observed across various PTCL subtypes. Results of the JACKPOT8 trial have been published in Annals of Oncology and The Lancet Oncology."With > 200 to 400-fold selectivity over other JAK family members and ideal pharmacokinetic properties, golidocitinib exerts potent antitumour efficacy with a favourable safety profile," the company said.

上市批准加速审批临床结果

2024-04-05

·BiG生物创新社

核药接住了泼天的富贵：过去5年的交易、投资、市场格局

作者｜文心第二代放射性药物在肿瘤学领域的商业成功重新点燃了人们对这种治疗模式的兴趣，引起该领域公司的交易激增，风险融资增加。鉴于这一新兴的行业兴趣，Brianne Sullivan等人在Nature发文“The radiopharmaceutical renaissance: radiating hope in cancer therapy”。据此，本文评估了过去5年放射性药物领域的交易和投资格局，涵盖了治疗、诊断和诊断加治疗药物。 01 一代核药历经曲折，二代核药终获成功！系统放射性药物作为癌症的治疗方法首次应用于20世纪40年代，当时医生使用放射性碘治疗甲状腺癌症。鉴于早期放射治疗缺乏效力，以及由于缺乏特异性而产生的副作用，后来的药物经过发展，由科学家通过将放射性同位素与靶向部分（如肿瘤特异性小分子、肽或抗体）连接起来，开发出了更安全、更有效的药物。商业上可用的抗体放射治疗药物的出现始于本世纪初，2002年和2003年分别批准了Zevalin（ibritumomab tiuxetan；现在由Acrotech Biopharma销售）和Bexxar（tositumomab and iodine-131 [I-131] tositumomab；由葛兰素史克公司开发）用于治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤。尽管疗效显著，医生热情高涨，但几个关键挑战——包括生产和处理所需的专用设施、设备和专业知识——限制了它们的商业成功。Zevalin和Bexxar在上市后的十多年里销量一直很低，导致Zevalin的所有权多次变更，Bexxar被从市场上撤下。而第二代放射性药物Xofigo（radium-223 [Ra-223] dichloride；拜耳，2013年批准）、Luthathera（lutetium-177 [Lu-177] dotatate；Advanced Accelerator Applications，2018年批准）和Pluvicto（lutetium-177 [Lu-177] vipivotide tetraxetan；诺华，2022年批准）已在商业上取得成功。XofigoXofigo是唯一批准的α粒子靶向疗法，该药是一款可发射α粒子的放射活性治疗药物。来自关键III期ALSYMPCA研究的数据证实：在治疗伴症状性骨转移且无已知内脏转移的转移性去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者时，与安慰剂相比，Xofigo可提供三重获益：显著延长生存期、推迟首次症状性骨骼事件（SSE）的发生时间、改善生活质量。此外，Xofigo还具有良好的安全性。LuthatheraLuthathera是一种放射性配体疗法，该药物去年9月25日III期NETTER-2试验达到了主要终点。与单独使用大剂量长效奥曲肽相比，Lutathera联合长效奥曲肽一线治疗新诊断为体泌素受体阳性、2级和3级晚期胃肠胰神经内分泌肿瘤（GEP-NET）患者的无进展生存期（PFS）实现明显改善。PluvictoPluvicto被批准用于治疗转移性去势耐受性前列腺癌症，它已经步入了成为重磅药物的行列，据诺华公司报告，2023年，pluvicto销售额9.8亿美元，同比增长高达261%。与现有的治疗相比，疗效的提高，包括放射肿瘤学家在内的肿瘤学实践的发展，以及稳定性和安全性提高的放射性同位素的使用，都为该领域注入了活力。 02 “诊疗一体化”是核药发展的大趋势此外，放射性药物的使用范围逐渐从治疗领域扩展到诊断领域。含有放射性成分的诊断剂在特定器官、组织或细胞中积聚，能够检测异常或功能变化，长期以来一直用于评估肿瘤、神经系统疾病、炎症性疾病和感染。最近，诊断治疗放射性药物的开发得到了大力推动，这种药物结合了诊断和治疗特性，支持“发现即治疗”的方法。诊断成分用于可视化和评估疾病或病症，然后使用相同或互补的放射性药物用于治疗目的。以个性化方式将诊断和治疗相结合的能力，为改善患者预后、优化治疗策略和推进精准医学方法带来了巨大的希望。 03 过去5年，核药共交易86笔在过去5年里，放射性药物领域共进行了86笔战略交易，其中大多数是合作/共同开发（n=26）和基于授权（n=26）的协议。2018年至2021年，交易格局相对稳定。然而，在2022年，交易数量比2021年增加了近两倍（分别为n=25和n=9；图1a）。值得注意的是，在临床前阶段（n=20）达成的交易数量最多，主要是由具有现有核医学能力和专业知识的公司（如Fusion Pharmaceuticals和Novartis）推动的，这些公司寻求扩大其放射性药物管线。许多交易也发生在2期临床阶段（n=18）；主要涉及基于授权和收购的诊断放射性药物交易（图1a）。图注：2018-2023年放射性药物领域生物制药公司的交易分布。a，每年按阶段划分的交易数量。该领域的活跃整合者包括大型全球生物制药公司（如诺华和拜耳）和专门的核医学公司（如Fusion Pharmaceuticals和Curium Pharma），交易活动涉及诊断、治疗和治疗加治疗药物。诊断放射性药物在该领域的交易总数中占据相当大的比例（约41%），其次是诊断治疗药物（约32%）和治疗药物（约27%；图1b）。肿瘤学在诊断治疗药物交易领域占据主导地位（分别占交易的93%和100%）；诊断领域的大部分交易在神经学领域（54%），其次是肿瘤学（31%）。图注：2018-2023年放射性药物领域生物制药公司的交易分布。b，每种形式的按适应症划分的交易数量。数据来源：Cortellis。*截至2023年10月3日。在分析期间，有17笔交易在宣布时披露了财务条款（约20%）。在所有开发阶段和模式中，商业交易的平均潜在总价值为8.34亿美元（前期2.84亿美元，里程碑5.5亿美元）（图2a）。与诊断资产的平均总交易价值（3900万美元；n=4）相比，诊断治疗（n=4）和治疗（n=9）资产的潜在交易价值分别高达7.29亿美元和10.26亿美元。诊断治疗资产的平均前期交易价值是治疗资产的2倍，这可能是由于前者的临床和监管风险较低。图注：2018-2023年放射性药物领域生物制药公司的交易价值。a按方式分类的交易价值。在考虑资产到期时的交易价值时，随着技术在临床阶段的进展，临床阶段资产的价值不断增加，尽管与早期临床资产相比，发现阶段交易的总交易价值更高（图2b）。在发现阶段达成的交易中，大部分（97%）的价值在于里程碑付款，反映了这些基于合作的交易在放射性药物疗法的发现、开发和商业化方面的高风险、高回报性质。图注：2018-2023年放射性药物领域生物制药公司的交易价值。b，按阶段分类的交易价值。数据来源：Cortellis。*截至2023年10月3日。商业阶段的交易主要是并购——收购近期获得美国食品和药物管理局（FDA）批准的公司。值得注意的是，诺华公司在2018年支付了39亿美元的预付款，收购了Advanced Accelerator Applications公司，紧随其后的是FDA批准该公司的神经内分泌肿瘤（NET）诊断产品Netspot（镓[ga-68] dotatate试剂盒），几乎与FDA批准诺华的治疗性产品Lutathera的时间相吻合。 04 核药公司融资数量稳步增加，集中于肿瘤领域自2018年以来，放射性药物领域发生的融资数量（n=54）一直在稳步增加，主要集中在癌症适应症（n=45；图3）。最活跃的融资集中在诊断加治疗（50%），其次是治疗（34%）和诊断（16%），大多数融资发生在早期，分别为A系列（56%）和B系列（32%）。随着兴趣和临床开发的不断提高，融资水平也在不断提高；2023年前三季度，九次融资的平均融资额为5100万美元，约为2018年全年四次融资2600万美元的2倍（图3）。图注：2018-2023年放射性药物领域源自私募融资的风险投资。*融资从A轮到D轮。数据来源：Pitchbook。*截至2023年10月3日。 05 上市公司交易收购热情不减虽然围绕放射性药物的热情导致了交易的增加，但从2023年初开始在美国主要交易所（纽约证券交易所或纳斯达克）上市的五家放射性药物公司（Fusion Pharmaceuticals、Lantheus Medical Imaging、POINT Biopharma、Perspective Therapeutics和Actinium Pharmaceuticals）的表现喜忧参半。从年初到2023年10月3日，他们的表现从POINT Biopharma股价上涨71%到Actinium Pharmaceuticals股价下跌43%不等。五家公司中，位于中位数的公司Perspective Therapeutics的股价上涨了11%，远高于纳斯达克生物技术指数的增长幅度，该指数在同一时期内下跌了7%。公共放射性药物公司平均表现积极的一个可能原因是私人市场模式带来的兴奋情绪蔓延到了公共市场。支持这一理论的是RayzeBio的首次公开募股（IPO），RayzeBio是一家放射性药物治疗公司，拥有一项主要资产，即用于治疗胃肠胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的临床3期开发阶段的锕-225（Ac-225）dotatate。该公司在2023年9月15日在纳斯达克上市时筹集了3.58亿美元，上市后估值接近10亿美元。这是迄今为止年度第二大生物技术IPO，仅次于Acelyrin募集的5.4亿美元，是2023年医疗保健IPO平均规模的约2.9倍。2023年12月26日，RayzeBio与百时美施贵宝签署了最终合并协议，以41亿美元的价格被收购。RayzeBio股价当时溢价134%。一天后，礼来公司宣布以14亿美元的价格收购POINT Biopharma，该价格比POINT Biopharma在2023年10月3日宣布收购前一天的收盘价溢价87%。大型制药公司愿意为放射性制药公司支付高额溢价，进一步表明了该领域日益增长的兴趣。写在最后随着大量投资涌入早期放射性药物公司，作者预计随着这些新技术的成熟，制药公司将继续进行授权和并购活动。此外，随着对个性化医疗的日益重视，诊断加治疗的模式可能会继续受到人们的青睐；实际上，在上文的分析中，治疗诊断在考虑的模式中获得了最大的前期价值。放射性药物在肿瘤学以外的领域的使用可能会吸引更多的公司和风险投资商。由于放射性药物在可视化大脑和其他中央神经系统部分方面的独特能力，神经学在诊断交易中处于领先地位。总体而言，随着交易的继续进行，放射性药物领域充满了期待和期望。参考资料：The radiopharmaceutical renaissance: radiating hope in cancer therapy共建Biomedical创新生态圈！如何加入BiG会员？

放射疗法临床3期

100 项与 Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. 相关的药物交易

登录后查看更多信息

100 项与 Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. 相关的转化医学

登录后查看更多信息

组织架构

使用我们的机构树数据加速您的研究。

或

查看完整样例数据

管线布局

2024年11月05日管线快照

管线布局中药物为当前组织机构及其子机构作为药物机构进行统计，早期临床1期并入临床1期，临床1/2期并入临床2期，临床2/3期并入临床3期

临床前

申请上市

批准上市

其他

登录后查看更多信息

当前项目

药物(靶点)	适应症	全球最高研发状态

盐酸美法仑 ( DNA )	多发性骨髓瘤更多	批准上市
左亚叶酸	骨肉瘤更多	批准上市
氨苯蝶啶氢氯噻嗪 ( NCC x SCNA )	水肿更多	批准上市
贝林司他 ( HDACs )	外周T细胞淋巴瘤更多	批准上市
普拉曲沙 ( DHFR )	外周T细胞淋巴瘤更多	批准上市