Umbralisib Tosylate

Mantle cell lymphoma is a rare and aggressive type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma originating from B-cells in the "mantle zone" of the lymph nodes. The development of novel targeted therapies and immunotherapies, such as Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, is improving treatment outcomes and driving market growth for Mantle cell lymphoma. LAS VEGAS, Sept. 19, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- DelveInsight's ' Mantle Cell Lymphoma Pipeline Insight 2024 ' report provides comprehensive global coverage of pipeline mantle cell lymphoma therapies in various stages of clinical development, major pharmaceutical companies are working to advance the pipeline space and future growth potential of the mantle cell lymphoma pipeline domain. Key Takeaways from the Mantle Cell Lymphoma Pipeline Report DelveInsight's mantle cell lymphoma pipeline report depicts a robust space with 20+ active players working to develop 22+ pipeline therapies for mantle cell lymphoma treatment. Key mantle cell lymphoma companies such as AbbVie, Adicet Bio, InnoCare Pharma Inc., Guangzhou Lupeng Pharmaceutical Company LTD., BeiGene, Nurix, LegoChem Biosciences, Xynomic Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Incyte Corporation, TG Therapeutics, Janssen/Pharmacyclics, Eternity Bioscience, Traws Pharm, Advenchen Laboratories, and others are evaluating new mantle cell lymphoma drugs to improve the treatment landscape. Promising mantle cell lymphoma pipeline therapies such as Venetoclax, ADI-001, Orelabrutinib, LP-168, BGB-11417, NX 2127, LCB 71, NX 5948, Abexinostat, Pembrolizumab, Parsaclisib, Umbralisib, Ibrutinib, Edralbrutinib, Narazaciclib, Lucitanib, and others are under different phases of mantle cell lymphoma clinical trials. In May 2024, AstraZeneca had announced positive interim results from the Phase III ECHO clinical trial, which evaluated Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor Calquence (acalabrutinib) in combination with standard chemoimmunotherapy for treating mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In March 2024, BeiGene, Ltd. announced the presentation of emerging oncology pipeline data at the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Annual Meeting. Additional highlights include preclinical characterization data for an investigational BTK degrader, BGB-16673, currently in clinical development for B-cell malignancies, including mantle cell lymphoma In October 2023, Ascentage Pharma announced that it has entered into a clinical collaboration with AstraZeneca Investment. The two companies will jointly conduct a registrational Phase III study of the Bcl-2 inhibitor, APG-2575 (lisaftoclax), in combination with AstraZeneca's Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor, CALQUENCE® (acalabrutinib), in treatment-naive patients with first-line chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL). In January 2023, the FDA granted an orphan drug designation to LP-284, a novel small-molecule, next-generation acylfulvene, for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), a rare and aggressive form of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), according to an announcement from Lantern Pharma. Request a sample and discover the recent advances in mantle cell lymphoma treatment drugs @ Mantle Cell Lymphoma Pipeline Report The mantle cell lymphoma pipeline report provides detailed profiles of pipeline assets, a comparative analysis of clinical and non-clinical stage mantle cell lymphoma drugs, inactive and dormant assets, a comprehensive assessment of driving and restraining factors, and an assessment of opportunities and risks in the mantle cell lymphoma clinical trial landscape. Mantle Cell Lymphoma Overview Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) characterized by the (11,14) translocation, leading to overexpression of the cyclin D1 (CCND1) gene. Its various morphological variants can make diagnosis challenging, though some cases are straightforward. Many individuals with MCL are asymptomatic in the early stages, but may later seek medical attention due to persistent, typically painless swelling of lymph nodes, especially in the neck and throat region (e.g., Waldeyer's ring). MCL is marked by a reciprocal chromosomal translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32), which places the cyclin D1 gene next to the immunoglobulin heavy chain gene, causing continuous cyclin D1 expression. This overexpression contributes to tumor cell proliferation through cell cycle dysregulation, chromosomal instability, and epigenetic changes. Rarely, MCL cases without this translocation may involve CCND2 or CCND3 translocations. Hypothetical molecular subtypes, based on the cell of origin, correlate with clinical phenotypes: classical or aggressive MCL arises from naive B cells lacking or having limited iGVH mutations and expressing SOX11, a neural transcription factor inhibiting terminal B cell differentiation. The indolent variant originates from antigen-experienced B cells with IGVH somatic hypermutations, typically SOX11-negative and genetically stable. Diagnosis of MCL involves detailed patient history, thorough clinical evaluation, and specialized tests, including biopsy of an affected lymph node or bone marrow. These tests confirm the NHL type and subtype, assess disease extent, and determine appropriate treatments. Treatment for MCL is multifaceted and tailored to each patient, often including chemotherapy, immunotherapy drugs like rituximab, targeted therapies such as ibrutinib, and stem cell transplants, particularly for aggressive disease or younger patients. Radiation therapy may target specific lymphoma areas. Participation in clinical trials can offer new treatment options. Treatment plans are developed collaboratively by healthcare professionals and patients, considering disease stage, overall health, and personal preferences. Regular monitoring and follow-up care are essential to track treatment response and manage side effects effectively. Find out more about mantle cell lymphoma treatment drugs @ Drugs for Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treatment A snapshot of the Mantle Cell Lymphoma Pipeline Drugs mentioned in the report: Learn more about the emerging mantle cell lymphoma pipeline therapies @ Mantle Cell Lymphoma Clinical Trials Mantle Cell Lymphoma Therapeutics Assessment The mantle cell lymphoma pipeline report proffers an integral view of the mantle cell lymphoma emerging novel therapies segmented by stage, product type, molecule type, mechanism of action, and route of administration. Scope of the Mantle Cell Lymphoma Pipeline Report Coverage: Global Therapeutic Assessment By Product Type: Mono, Combination, Mono/Combination Therapeutic Assessment By Clinical Stages: Discovery, Pre-clinical, Phase I, Phase II, Phase III Therapeutics Assessment By Route of Administration: Oral, Parenteral, Intravenous, Subcutaneous, Topical Therapeutics Assessment By Molecule Type: Recombinant fusion proteins, Small molecule, Monoclonal antibody, Peptide, Polymer, Gene therapy Therapeutics Assessment By Mechanism of Action: Apoptosis stimulants, Proto-oncogene protein c-bcl-2 inhibitors, Proteasome inhibitors, Immunologic cytotoxicity, T lymphocyte replacements, Agammaglobulinemia tyrosine kinase inhibitors Key Mantle Cell Lymphoma Companies: AbbVie, Adicet Bio, InnoCare Pharma Inc., Guangzhou Lupeng Pharmaceutical Company LTD., BeiGene, Nurix, LegoChem Biosciences, Xynomic Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Incyte Corporation, TG Therapeutics, Janssen/Pharmacyclics, Eternity Bioscience, Traws Pharm, Advenchen Laboratories, and others Key Mantle Cell Lymphoma Pipeline Therapies: Venetoclax, ADI-001, Orelabrutinib, LP-168, BGB-11417, NX 2127, LCB 71, NX 5948, Abexinostat, Pembrolizumab, Parsaclisib, Umbralisib, Ibrutinib, Edralbrutinib, Narazaciclib, Lucitanib, and others Dive deep into rich insights for new drugs for mantle cell lymphoma treatment, visit @ Mantle Cell Lymphoma Drugs Table of Contents For further information on the mantle cell lymphoma pipeline therapeutics, reach out @ Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treatment Drugs Related Reports B-Cell Lymphoma Epidemiology B-Cell Lymphoma Epidemiology Forecast – 2032 report delivers an in-depth understanding of the disease, historical and forecasted epidemiology as well as the B-cell lymphoma epidemiology trends. B-Cell Lymphoma Market B-Cell Lymphoma Market Insights, Epidemiology, and Market Forecast – 2032 report deliver an in-depth understanding of the disease, historical and forecasted epidemiology, as well as the market trends, market drivers, market barriers, and key B-cell lymphoma companies, including Vincerx Pharma, Ubix Therapeutics, Biomea Fusion Inc, Shanghai Hengrui Pharmaceutical, BeiGene, Hanmi Pharmaceutical, among others. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Pipeline Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Pipeline Insight – 2024 report provides comprehensive insights about the pipeline landscape, pipeline drug profiles, including clinical and non-clinical stage products, and the key DLBCL companies, including Genmab, Roche, Acerta Pharma, Autolus, Xynomic Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, Celgene, AbbVie, Mabion, among others. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Market Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Market Insights, Epidemiology, and Market Forecast – 2034 report deliver an in-depth understanding of the disease, historical and forecasted epidemiology, as well as the market trends, market drivers, market barriers, and key B-cell lymphoma companies, including AbbVie, Genmab, Merck, Roche, Xencor and Janssen, Denovo Biopharma, Calithera Biosciences, IMV, Biogen, Autolus Therapeutics, Allogene Therapeutics, Novartis, Miltenyi Biomedicine, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, among others. About DelveInsight DelveInsight is a leading Business Consultant and Market Research firm focused exclusively on life sciences. It supports pharma companies by providing comprehensive end-to-end solutions to improve their performance. Get hassle-free access to all the healthcare and pharma market research reports through our subscription-based platform PharmDelve . Contact Us Shruti Thakur [email protected] +14699457679 Logo: SOURCE DelveInsight Business Research, LLP WANT YOUR COMPANY'S NEWS FEATURED ON PRNEWSWIRE.COM? 440k+ Newsrooms & Influencers 9k+ Digital Media Outlets 270k+ Journalists Opted In GET STARTED

In 2022, Gilead announced that it would voluntarily withdraw Zydelig from the U.S. market for two lymphoma treatments, a full six years after it suspended the trial due to patient deaths. A Gilead spokesperson clarified that the withdrawal was not due to safety concerns, but rather because of insurmountable obstacles to recruiting subjects for additional research trials required by the FDA. Nevertheless, Zydelig retains its eligibility for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and remains on the market for patients. Notably, the withdrawal of Zydelig coincides with the withdrawal of several other PI3K inhibitors used to treat follicular lymphoma: Secura Bio's duvelisib (trade name Copiktra) withdrawn in December 2021, TG's umbralisib (trade name Ukoniq) withdrawn in 2022 (here may be a clerical error, read "February" or adjusted to another month), Bayer's copanlisib (trade name Aliqopa) also withdrew from the market in November 2023. Together, these events outline an industry trend. A study published in JAMA Internal Medicine reveals an interesting data point: Before Gilead decided to withdraw some uses of Zydelig from the U.S. market, its global sales had reached a staggering $842 million. This reflects the wide application and high recognition of the drug in the market, although it ultimately failed to fully meet all expectations for various reasons. Interestingly, the pharmaceutical industry sometimes employs a series of ingenious strategies to speed up the process of bringing a product to market. Eli Lilly, for example, successfully used all four avenues of acceleration to bring oncology product Lartruvo to market in 2016. The key clinical data for the product is based only on the results of a trial involving 133 patients, and while the results showed a possible positive impact on survival outcomes for sarcoma, a cancer that affects muscles and other soft tissues, the specific effect on slowing cancer growth is unclear. However, just over two years later, a larger study revealed that Lartruvo had no significant impact on patient survival, and Eli Lilly had to withdraw it from the market. Despite this, Lartruvo still managed to achieve a whopping $500 million in sales during its short market life. Among the many drugs approved for accelerated marketing, oncology products have become the hardest hit by ineffective drugs. However, as the development of therapies continues to deepen and progress, new questions continue to emerge and are presented to the FDA. In particular, advanced therapies represented by cell and gene therapies, when they meet with the accelerated approval system, have brought unprecedented challenges to this "old revolution". Given the complexity of cell and gene therapies and the relative lack of understanding of their safety, once ineffective advanced therapies are released to the market, the consequences and impacts will be far beyond the scope of small molecule ineffective drugs. For example, the tragic death of a three-year-old boy in a clinical trial of Pfizer's fordadistrogene movaparvovec, a gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, highlights the shortcomings and limitations of researchers in predicting the potential for serious adverse events. As vectors of ssRNA (single stranded RNA), viruses (such as AAV) play a critical role in gene therapy, but can also cause a series of serious adverse events including cardiopulmonary failure, myocarditis, thrombotic microangiopathy, and acute liver failure. These potential risks have forced the FDA to be more cautious and rigorous in approving gene therapies. Speaking at the annual meeting of the American Society for Gene and Cell Therapy, CBER director Peter Marks said speeding up the withdrawal of approved gene therapies could be easier and faster than for small-molecule therapies. At the same time, he stressed that "accelerated approval of gene therapy is not a get-out-of-jail-free ticket." The FDA will not hesitate to withdraw accelerated approval of rare disease gene therapies if they fail subsequent confirmatory trials." Marks further points out that the "one-size-fits-all" nature of gene therapy makes confirmatory studies easier to follow and monitor patients over time. It also makes for greater clarity and clarity on the question of whether to withdraw gene therapy. In contrast, there may be more controversy and disagreement in the decision process of withdrawing cancer therapy. Marks, however, said the FDA would only withdraw gene therapy if it was clear that the patient benefit was likely to be "minimal" but the side effects were significant. He cited a case in which Bluebird Bio's sickle cell gene therapy Lyfgenia (lovotibeglogene autotemcel) caused patients to develop myelodysplastic syndrome and leukemia during treatment. The product was approved by the FDA in December 2023 with a boxed warning about hematologic malignancies. Marks said it is unclear whether these malignancies are related to the preconditioning regimen associated with Lyfgenia treatment, the underlying disease, or the gene therapy itself. In addition, the case of drug manufacturers refusing to voluntarily withdraw the market is not unique in the history of FDA accelerated approval. Everything from the withdrawal of Makena, a drug that reduced the risk of preterm birth, after 12 years on the market, to the legal battle between Pepaxto and the FDA highlights the complexity and seriousness of the issue. In the face of these challenges, FDA has to seek the support of legislation to strengthen its regulatory power and capability. Fortunately, the introduction of the FDORA (Comprehensive Food and Drug Reform Act) bill provides the FDA with greater flexibility and autonomy to act without public hearings.