Adenoviral brachyury vaccine(Etubics Corp.)

Vaccination is the most effective measure to prevent influenza. However, due to the existence of antigen drift and/or antigen shift of influenza virus, the vaccine strains often do not match the epidemic strains, so that the protection provided by influenza vaccine is still limited. With the rapid development of new vaccine technology, a kind of influenza vaccine with extensive protection or universal has attracted great attention. It can effectively induce humoral and cellular immunity against the conserved epitopes of influenza virus, provide good protection against various types/subtypes of influenza virus, and has a rapid production platform, which is the ideal goal for the development of a new generation of universal influenza vaccine. This article reviews the latest research progress of influenza universal vaccine.

Concurrent ETBX-011, ETBX-051, and ETBX-061 can be safely administered to patients with advanced cancer. All patients developed CD4+ and/or CD8+ T-cell responses after vaccination to at least one tumor-associated antigen (TAA) encoded by the vaccine; 5/6 patients (83%) developed MUC1-specific T cells, 4/6 (67%) developed CEA-specific T cells, and 3/6 (50%) developed brachyury-specific T cells. The presence of adenovirus 5-neutralizing antibodies did not prevent the generation of TAA-specific T cells.

A novel adenovirus-based vaccine targeting three human tumor-associated antigens—CEA, MUC1, and brachyury—has demonstrated antitumor cytolytic T-cell responses in preclinical animal models of cancer.

This open-label, phase I trial evaluated concurrent administration of three therapeutic vaccines (ETBX-011 = CEA, ETBX-061 = MUC1 and ETBX-051 = brachyury). All three vaccines used the same modified adenovirus 5 (Ad5) vector backbone and were administered at a single dose level (DL) of 5 × 1011 viral particles (VP) per vector. The vaccine regimen consisting of all three vaccines was given every 3 weeks for three doses then every 8 weeks for up to 1 year. Clinical and immune responses were evaluated.

Ten patients enrolled on trial (DL1 = 6 with 4 in the DL1 expansion cohort). All treatment-related adverse events were temporary, self-limiting, grade 1/2 and included injection site reactions and flu-like symptoms. Antigen-specific T cells to MUC1, CEA, and/or brachyury were generated in all patients. There was no evidence of antigenic competition. The administration of the vaccine regimen produced stable disease as the best clinical response.

Concurrent ETBX-011, ETBX-051, and ETBX-061 can be safely administered to patients with advanced cancer. Further studies of the vaccine regimen in combination with other agents, including immune checkpoint blockade, are planned.